the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improving wheat phenology and yield forecasting with a deep learning-enhanced WOFOST model under extreme weather conditions
Abstract. Extreme weather events pose significant challenges to crop production, making their assessment essential for developing effective climate adaptation strategies. Process-based crop models are valuable for evaluating climate change impacts on crop yields but often struggle to simulate the effects of extreme weather accurately. To fill this knowledge gap, this study introduces WOFOST-EW model, an enhanced version of the World Food Studies Simulation Model (WOFOST), which integrates extreme weather indices and deep learning algorithm to improve simulations of winter wheat growth under extreme conditions. We validate WOFOST-EW using phenological, yield, and extreme weather data from agricultural meteorological stations in the North China Plain. The results show that WOFOST-EW improves simulation accuracy, with heading and maturity dates predicted more accurately by 10.64 % and 12.86 %, respectively. The R² value for yield simulations increases from 0.67 to 0.76. Validation during extreme weather years (2008 and 2018) further highlights the model's improved performance, with the R² increasing from 0.69 to 0.79 in 2008 and from 0.61 to 0.80 in 2018, respectively. WOFOST-EW effectively captures the impacts of extreme weather, offering a reliable tool for agricultural planning and climate adaptation. As extreme weather events become increasingly frequent, WOFOST-EW can assist decision-makers in more accurately evaluating crop yields, providing technical support for agricultural systems in the context of global climate change.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(4319 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1174 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 29 May 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4010', Theodoros Mavrommatis, 09 Apr 2025
reply
This is a significant contribution. Among others issues (noted on the attached manuscript that should be taken care of) a major one is related to the selection of the "extreme" years chosen in this study.
Regards,
Theodoros Mavromatis
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4010', Theodoros Mavrommatis, 09 Apr 2025
reply
This is a significant contribution. Among others issues (noted on the attached manuscript that should be taken care of) a major one is related to the selection of the "extreme" years chosen in this study.
Regards,
Theodoros Mavromatis
Data sets
Meteorological data United States National Centers for Environmental Information https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/metadata/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/gov.noaa.ncdc:C00516/html
Soil data ISRIC world soil information https://doi.org/10.17027/isric-wdcsoils.20230327
Model code and software
WOFOST model Allard De Wit et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14785412
SCE-UA algorithm Tobias Houska https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7683999
LSTM model François Chollet et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14785196
WOFOST-EW model Jinhui Zheng https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14859629
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
185 | 95 | 7 | 287 | 17 | 8 | 8 |
- HTML: 185
- PDF: 95
- XML: 7
- Total: 287
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1