the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement Report: Unraveling PM10 Sources and Oxidative Potential Across Chinese Regions: Insights Analysis Based on CNN-LSTM and Receptor Model
Abstract. The oxidative potential (OP) of particulate matter is a key driver of PM10-induced adverse health effects, triggering oxidative stress and inflammatory responses that increase respiratory and cardiovascular disease risks. To evaluate PM10 and its OP characteristics across China, samples were collected from twelve representative monitoring stations from June 2022 to May 2023. A deep learning model combining Convolutional Neural Networks and Long Short-Term Memory networks (CNN-LSTM) was employed to reconstruct anomalous PM10 data, achieving R2 values of 0.967 and 0.884 for training and test sets, respectively. Significant spatial variations in PM10 were observed, with highest concentrations in the northwestern regions (Xi'an: 98.20 ± 52.92 μg·m-3, Dunhuang: 90.36 ± 54.72 μg·m-3), the lowest in the northeast (Longfengshan: 40.04 ± 24.04 μg·m-3, Dalian: 40.35 ± 15.66 μg·m-3), and elevated levels in suburban areas (average: 85.43 ± 46.69 μg·m-3). Urban sites showed the highest OP values, with significantly higher PM10 concentrations in northern regions compared to southern ones (p<0.05). Most sites exhibited peak PM10 and OP levels in winter and lowest in summer. Source apportionment using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) revealed dust (13.2–27.4 %), biomass burning (9.5–39.3 %), traffic (16.6–21.4 %), and agricultural activities (13–22 %) as main contributors to PM10. PMF analysis identified traffic as the primary OP contributor (24–48 %) across sites, with regional variations in biomass burning (57 % in Nanning), agricultural activities (37 % in Zhengzhou), and dust (22–23 % in Gucheng and Longfengshan). These findings highlight the need to control traffic emissions and other major sources to reduce OP and protect public health.
- Preprint
(1759 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(129 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 Jul 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-626', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Jun 2025
reply
This manuscript applies CNN-LSTM to replace outliers in PM10 mass concentrations from 12 monitoring sites in China, evaluates spatiotemporal patterns of PM10 mass and OP, and performs source apportionment for four of the sites. It provides a valuable dataset that covers urban, suburban, rural and remote sites. The topic is relevant to ACP, however, several methodological and interpretational issues currently limit the manuscript’s robustness and impact. Substantial revision is required before the manuscript can be considered for publication in ACP.
Firstly, although the title and Methods emphasize the CNN-LSTM model, it is used solely for outlier replacement. The manuscript does not yet demonstrate what additional insights the deep learning approach offers beyond conventional gap-filling techniques such as linear regression or random forest. The authors are encouraged to supply a comparison table that shows the CNN-LSTM’s performance relative to other simpler methods. It might also be helpful to conduct an independent cross-validation, for example, leave-one-site-out to confirm that the network reproduces physically meaningful variability rather than site-specific bias.
Regarding the source apportionment, PMF analysis is only conducted for four of the twelve sites. The manuscript should explain the basis for this selection. Authors should also include more comprehensive error estimation for the PMF analysis. Authors should expand the diagnostics in Table S3 to report whether > 80% of factor elements are mapped in BS runs, and summarize BS-DISP error estimates.
Furthermore, the discussion on OP lacks depth. OPv reflects a combination of PM mass concentration and particle intrinsic toxicity. The current discussion on OP focuses almost exclusively on emissions. Authors are encouraged to discuss how emission sources influence OPv differently from their share of PM10 mass. For example, integrating Fig. 11 and Fig. 12 will help to reveal the intrinsic toxicity associated with different emission sources.
Specific comments:
#33, “due to its small particle size”, this statement does not seem valid for PM10.
#62, photochemical aging can either decrease or increase OP, for example, this paper reports a decrease after O3 aging: Ma, S., Cheng, D., Tang, Y., Fan, Y., Li, Q., He, C., Zhao, Z. and Xu, T., 2025. Investigation of oxidative potential of fresh and O3-aging PM2. 5 from various emission sources across urban and rural regions. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 151, pp.608-615.
#67-69, this statement is inaccurate. Furthermore, CNN-LSTM is used solely for dealing with missing data, and thus referring to traditional source attribution methods in this context is misleading.
#190-191, the criterion for flagging outliers appears arbitrary. The summed species exceeding the measured PM10 mass does not necessarily indicate outliers considering measurement uncertainties.
#331, which six monitoring stations are being referred to?
#353-355, any reference that supports the temperature-dependent partitioning of ammonium sulfate?
#365-366, the high OPv in Gucheng is related to its high PM10 mass concentration.
3.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2 source appointment should be source apportionment.
#471, Liu et al. 2023 is cited in the text but missing from the reference list.
Figure 10, The agricultural activities factor shows very different OC/EC loadings at ZZ vs. GC. Please provide supporting literature or discuss why the profiles are different.
#510-512, please clarify what pathways.
#526-529, these statements are inconsistent with the results in Fig. 12. In GC, the contribution of coal combustion to OPv ranks second among the four sites, and the secondary aerosols contribution at GC is smaller than LFS. Please re-examine the conclusions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-626-RC1
Data sets
Measurement report: Unraveling PM10 Sources and Oxidative Potential Across Chinese Regions Insights Analysis Based on CNN-LSTM and Receptor Model Qinghe Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15420768
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
160 | 36 | 9 | 205 | 12 | 8 | 9 |
- HTML: 160
- PDF: 36
- XML: 9
- Total: 205
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1