Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2209
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2209
19 Jul 2024
 | 19 Jul 2024

An evaluation of multi-fidelity methods for quantifying uncertainty in projections of ice-sheet mass-change

John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price

Abstract. This study investigated the computational benefits of using multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification (MFUQ) algorithms to quantify uncertainty in the mass change of Humboldt Glacier, Greenland, between 2007 and 2100 using a single climate change scenario. The goal of this study was to determine whether MFUQ can use multiple models of varying cost and accuracy to reduce the computational cost of estimating the mean and variance of the projected mass change of an ice sheet. The problem size and complexity were chosen to be representative of future continental scale studies while still facilitating a computationally feasible investigation of MFUQ methods. When quantifying uncertainty introduced by a high-dimensional parameterization of basal friction field, MFUQ was able to reduce the mean-squared error in the estimates of the statistics by well over an order of magnitude when compared to a single fidelity approach that only used the highest fidelity model. This significant reduction in computational cost was achieved despite the low-fidelity models used being incapable of capturing the local features of the ice flow fields predicted by the high-fidelity model. The MFUQ algorithms were able to effectively leverage the high correlation between each model's prediction of mass change, which all responded similarly to perturbations in the model inputs. Consequently, our results suggest that MFUQ could be highly useful for reducing the cost of computing continental scale probabilistic projections of sea-level rise due to ice-sheet mass change.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

03 Apr 2025
An evaluation of multi-fidelity methods for quantifying uncertainty in projections of ice-sheet mass change
John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 513–544, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025, 2025
Short summary
John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (12 Nov 2024) by Francisco de Melo Viríssimo
AR by John D. Jakeman on behalf of the Authors (12 Nov 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Nov 2024) by Francisco de Melo Viríssimo
RR by Vincent Verjans (20 Nov 2024)
RR by Douglas Brinkerhoff (28 Nov 2024)
RR by Dan Goldberg (13 Dec 2024)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (13 Dec 2024) by Francisco de Melo Viríssimo
AR by John D. Jakeman on behalf of the Authors (19 Dec 2024)  Author's response   Manuscript 
EF by Daria Karpachova (15 Jan 2025)  Author's tracked changes 
ED: Publish as is (15 Jan 2025) by Francisco de Melo Viríssimo
AR by John D. Jakeman on behalf of the Authors (16 Jan 2025)  Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by John D. Jakeman on behalf of the Authors (11 Mar 2025)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (14 Mar 2025) by Francisco de Melo Viríssimo

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

03 Apr 2025
An evaluation of multi-fidelity methods for quantifying uncertainty in projections of ice-sheet mass change
John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 513–544, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-513-2025, 2025
Short summary
John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price

Interactive computing environment

PyApprox John Jakeman https://github.com/sandialabs/pyapprox/

John D. Jakeman, Mauro Perego, D. Thomas Seidl, Tucker A. Hartland, Trevor R. Hillebrand, Matthew J. Hoffman, and Stephen F. Price

Viewed

Total article views: 761 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
473 169 119 761 27 28
  • HTML: 473
  • PDF: 169
  • XML: 119
  • Total: 761
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 768 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 768 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Apr 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
This study investigated the computational benefits of using multiple models of varying cost and accuracy to quantify uncertainty in the mass change of Humboldt Glacier, Greenland, between 2007 and 2100 using a single climate change scenario. Despite some models being incapable of capturing the local features of the ice flow fields, using multiple models reduced the error in the estimated statistics by over an order of magnitude when compared to an approach that only used a single accurate model.
Share