Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-267
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-267
06 Mar 2023
 | 06 Mar 2023

Dynamic savanna burning emission factors based on satellite data using a machine learning approach

Roland Vernooij, Tom Eames, Jeremy Russel-Smith, Cameron Yates, Robin Beatty, Jay Evans, Andrew Edwards, Natasha Ribeiro, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Marcos Giongo, Marco Borges, Máximo Menezes, Carol Barradas, Dave van Wees, and Guido van der Werf

Abstract. Landscape fires, predominantly in the frequently burning global savannas, are a substantial source of greenhouse gases and aerosols. The impact of these fires on atmospheric composition is partially determined by the chemical breakup of the elements in the fuel into individual emitted chemical species, which is described by emission factors (EFs). These EFs are known to be dependent on, amongst others, the type of fuel consumed, the moisture content of that fuel and the meteorological conditions during the fire, indicating that savanna EFs are temporally and spatially dynamic. Global emission inventories, however, rely on static biome-averaged EFs which makes them ill-suited for the estimation of regional biomass burning (BB) emissions and for capturing the effects of shifts in fire regimes. In this study we explore the main drivers of EF-variability within the savanna biome and assess which geospatial proxies can be used to estimate dynamic EFs for global models. We collected over 4500 EF bag measurements of CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O using an unmanned aerial system (UAS), and measured fuel parameters and fire severity proxies during 129 individual fires. The measurements cover a variety of savanna ecosystems under different seasonal conditions, sampled over the course of six fire seasons between 2017 and 2022. We complemented our own data with EFs from 85 fires with known locations and dates listed in the literature. Based on the locations, dates and time of the fires we retrieved a variety of fuel-, weather- and fire severity proxies (i.e. possible predictors) using globally available satellite and reanalysis data. We then trained random forest (RF) regressors to estimate dynamic EFs for CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O and calculated the spatiotemporal impact on BB emissions over the 2002–2016 period using the Global Fire Emissions Database version 4 with small fires (GFED4s). We found that the most important field indicators for the EFs of CO2, CO and CH4 were tree cover density, fuel moisture content and the grass to litter ratio. The grass to litter ratio and the nitrogen to carbon ratio were important indicators for N2O EFs. RF models using satellite observations performed well for the prediction of EF variability in the measured fires with out-of-sample correlation coefficients between 0.80 and 0.99, reducing the error in EF estimates by 60–85 % compared to static biome averages. Using dynamic EFs, global savanna emission estimates for 2002–2016 were 1.8 % higher for CO while CH4 and N2O emissions were respectively 5 % and 18 % lower compared to GFED4s. On a regional scale we found a spatial redistribution compared to GFED4s with higher CO, CH4 and N2O EFs in mesic regions and lower ones in xeric regions. Seasonal drying resulted in a decrease of the EFs of these species with the fire season progressing, with a stronger trend in open savannas than woodlands. Contrary to the minor impact on annual savanna average emissions, the model predicts localized reductions in EFs of CO, CH4 and N2O exceeding 60 % under seasonal conditions.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

10 Oct 2023
Dynamic savanna burning emission factors based on satellite data using a machine learning approach
Roland Vernooij, Tom Eames, Jeremy Russell-Smith, Cameron Yates, Robin Beatty, Jay Evans, Andrew Edwards, Natasha Ribeiro, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Marcos Vinicius Giongo, Marco Assis Borges, Máximo Menezes Costa, Ana Carolina Sena Barradas, Dave van Wees, and Guido R. Van der Werf
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1039–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023, 2023
Short summary

Roland Vernooij et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-267', Paul Laris, 19 Apr 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023
  • RC1: 'Referee report on egusphere-2023-267', Robert Yokelson, 20 Apr 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-267', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Apr 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-267', Paul Laris, 19 Apr 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023
  • RC1: 'Referee report on egusphere-2023-267', Robert Yokelson, 20 Apr 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-267', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Apr 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Roland Vernooij, 20 Jun 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (03 Jul 2023) by Anping Chen
AR by Roland Vernooij on behalf of the Authors (08 Jul 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Jul 2023) by Anping Chen
RR by Robert Yokelson (26 Jul 2023)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (02 Aug 2023) by Anping Chen
AR by Roland Vernooij on behalf of the Authors (16 Aug 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Aug 2023) by Anping Chen
AR by Roland Vernooij on behalf of the Authors (22 Aug 2023)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

10 Oct 2023
Dynamic savanna burning emission factors based on satellite data using a machine learning approach
Roland Vernooij, Tom Eames, Jeremy Russell-Smith, Cameron Yates, Robin Beatty, Jay Evans, Andrew Edwards, Natasha Ribeiro, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Marcos Vinicius Giongo, Marco Assis Borges, Máximo Menezes Costa, Ana Carolina Sena Barradas, Dave van Wees, and Guido R. Van der Werf
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1039–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023, 2023
Short summary

Roland Vernooij et al.

Data sets

Measurements of savanna landscap fire emission factors for CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O using a UAV-based sampling methodology Roland Vernooij https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7689032

Roland Vernooij et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 546 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
365 154 27 546 11 10
  • HTML: 365
  • PDF: 154
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 546
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 552 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 552 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Jan 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Savannas account for over half of the global landscape fire emissions. Although environmental and fuel conditions affect the ratio of species the fire emits, these dynamics have not been implemented in global models. We measured CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O emission factors (EFs), fuel parameters and fire severity proxies during 129 individual fires. We identified EF patterns, and trained models to estimate EFs of these species based on satellite observations, reducing the estimation error by 60–85 %.