the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Surface snow bromide and nitrate at Eureka, Canada in early spring and implications for polar boundary layer chemistry
Kimberly Strong
Alison Criscitiello
Marta Santos-Garcia
Kristof Bognar
Xiaoyi Zhao
Pierre Fogal
Kaley Walker
Sara Morris
Peter Effertz
Abstract. This study explores the role of snowpack in polar boundary layer chemistry, especially as a direct source of reactive bromine (BrOX=BrO+Br) and nitrogen (NOX=NO+NO2) in the Arctic springtime. Surface snow samples were collected daily from a Canadian high Arctic location at Eureka, Nunavut (80° N, 86° W) from the end of February to the end of March in 2018 and 2019. The snow was sampled at several sites representing distinct environments: sea ice, inland close to sea level, and a hilltop ~600 m above sea level (asl). At the inland sites, surface snow salinity has a double-peak distribution with the first and lowest peak at 0.001–0.002 practical salinity unit (psu), which corresponds to the precipitation effect, and the second peak at 0.01–0.04 psu, which is likely related to the salt accumulation effect (due to loss of water vapour by sublimation). Snow salinity on sea ice has a triple-peak distribution; its first and second peaks overlap with the inland peaks, and the third peak at 0.2–0.4 psu is likely due to the sea water effect (due to upward migration of brine on sea ice). At all sites, snow sodium and chloride concentrations increase by almost 10-fold from the top 0.2 cm to ~1.5 cm in depth. Surface snow bromide at sea level is significantly enriched, indicating a net sink of atmospheric bromine. Moreover, surface snow bromide at sea level has an increasing trend over the measurement time period, with mean slopes of 0.024 in the 0–0.2 cm layer and 0.016 μM d-1 in the 0.2–0.5 cm layer. Surface snow nitrate at sea level also shows a significant increasing trend, with mean slopes of 0.27, 0.20, and 0.07 μM d-1 in the top 0.2 cm, 0.2–0.5 cm, and 0.5–1.5 cm layers, respectively. Using these trends, an integrated net deposition flux of bromide of 1.01×107 molecules cm-2 s-1 and an integrated net deposition flux of nitrate of 2.6×108 molecules cm-2 s-1 were derived. In addition, nitrate and bromide in the morning samples are significantly higher than the afternoon samples, indicating a strong photochemistry effect. However, the mean bromide loss rate (0.027–0.040 μM) is smaller than the nitrate loss rate (0.23–0.362 μM) by an order of magnitude, implying the reactive bromine emission flux from snowpack is significantly smaller than the reactive nitrogen emission flux, which is consistent with the large difference between their derived net deposition fluxes. After considering the photochemical loss effect, the corrected bromide deposition flux at sea level is 2.73×107 molecules cm-2 s-1; for nitrate, the corrected deposition flux is 5.98×108 molecules cm-2 s-1. In addition, the surface snow nitrate and bromide at inland sites were found to be significantly correlated (R=0.48–0.76), and the [NO3-]/[Br-] ratio of 4–7 indicates a possible acceleration effect of reactive bromine in atmospheric NOX-to-nitrate conversion. This is the first time such an effect has been seen in snow chemistry data obtained with a sampling frequency as short as one day.
- Preprint
(11753 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1159 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Xin Yang et al.
Status: open (until 12 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1446', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Sep 2023
reply
Yang et al report observations of snow concentrations of ions along with surface atmosphere ozone and BrO concentrations at an Arctic location in the early spring of 2018 and 2019. To my knowledge, these are the first depth-dependent observations of snow bromide, which may be useful for understanding processes determining reactive bromine emissions from snow. They use time and depth-dependent measurements of bromide and nitrate to calculate the net deposition flux during the observational time period. They find that nitrate and bromide in snow are correlated and suggest that they are linked to one another through the formation and hydrolysis of bromine nitrate. They also find that deposition is confined to the surface skin layer.
This paper is very difficult to read, especially the long results section. There are a lot of details and numbers and it is presented in a way that makes it very difficult to discern the big picture. It reads like a first draft. The paragraph starting on line 424 is a particularly good example of this. There are more numbers than words in this paragraph and it is not readable. In general, the paper needs some reorganization and needs to be presented in a more succinct and readable manner. It often reads as a list of disconnected observations.
A large portion of the results section focuses on salinity, but in the end, it is not clear what they learned from it as the results section is difficult to read and there is no follow-up on the salinity observations in the discussion or conclusions section. It is also unclear how an iceberg will impact snow salinity on sea ice and land.
Abstract line 26: missing a unit after 0.024.
Methods: State the eluants used for the IC measurements.
Line 342: I think you mean to say that the “concentrations” are larger, not the “profiles”.
Line 419: What is a near zero increasing trend? Does this mean that the increasing trend is not statistically different from zero?
Section 3.5: I think these calculations represent a net deposition flux (deposition minus emissions) and this should be explicitly stated.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1446-RC1
Xin Yang et al.
Xin Yang et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
175 | 47 | 9 | 231 | 16 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 175
- PDF: 47
- XML: 9
- Total: 231
- Supplement: 16
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1