Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-44
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-44
23 Jan 2026
 | 23 Jan 2026

Towards Constraining the Drivers of Variability and Trends in Subantarctic Productivity

Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie

Abstract. The subantarctic Southern Ocean is a climatically important region, where primary production largely drives the seasonal uptake of atmospheric CO2, contributing to the sequestration of anthropogenic carbon emissions. Seasonal iron and light limitation control annual net primary production (NPP) in this region, but the explicit mechanisms that drive interannual variability in NPP remain elusive due to sparse observations. This uncertainty is reflected in inconsistent interannual variability and trend estimates of remotely-sensed NPP algorithms. Without clear mechanistic underpinning, confidence in remotely-sensed NPP trends remains low and hinders predictive capability. To overcome observational limitations and better understand the drivers of interannual NPP variability, we analyse the explicit bottom-up and top-down controls of depth integrated NPP in a biogeochemical ocean model historical run (1958–2022) from the Indian sector of the subantarctic zone. The highest NPP years were primarily driven by increased relief of iron limitation, with iron supplied from both deeper mixing in winter/spring and enhanced remineralisation in summer. In spring, higher phytoplankton growth rates were decoupled from surface biomass, such that years with higher NPP were due to faster growth in the mixed layer. Faster growth rates emerged following deeper winter mixed layers, driving phytoplankton distributions deeper in winter and reducing mixed layer grazing loss rates in spring. This generated a predator-prey dynamic favouring surface biomass accumulation moving into summer. Thus, inconsistent remote-sensing NPP estimates may derive from how algorithms link biomass (rather than growth rates) to NPP. We applied our analysis to CMIP6 models, and while all historical simulations converged with respect to positive trends in NPP, bias from sea surface temperature trends influenced the mechanisms driving interannual NPP variability. These findings show that interacting top-down and bottom-up processes can decouple changes in NPP with respect to phytoplankton biomass, which has important implications for remote sensing NPP estimates based on biomass. Therefore, the need for cautionary approaches to NPP trend interpretation is highlighted, and that further observational data are needed to ground truth mechanistic understanding of NPP drivers.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Oct 2026
Towards constraining the drivers of variability and trends in subantarctic productivity
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie
Biogeosciences, 23, 6947–6977, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-6947-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-6947-2026, 2026
Short summary
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-44', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Feb 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply to RC1', Christopher Traill, 18 Jul 2026
  • RC2: 'Review of 'Towards Constraining the Drivers of Variability and Trends in Subantarctic Productivity'', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Jun 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply to RC2', Christopher Traill, 18 Jul 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (01 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
AR by Christopher Traill on behalf of the Authors (10 Aug 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (18 Aug 2026)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (29 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
AR by Christopher Traill on behalf of the Authors (01 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-44', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Feb 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply to RC1', Christopher Traill, 18 Jul 2026
  • RC2: 'Review of 'Towards Constraining the Drivers of Variability and Trends in Subantarctic Productivity'', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Jun 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply to RC2', Christopher Traill, 18 Jul 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (01 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
AR by Christopher Traill on behalf of the Authors (10 Aug 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (18 Aug 2026)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (29 Aug 2026) by Andrew Thurber
AR by Christopher Traill on behalf of the Authors (01 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Oct 2026
Towards constraining the drivers of variability and trends in subantarctic productivity
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie
Biogeosciences, 23, 6947–6977, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-6947-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-6947-2026, 2026
Short summary
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie

Viewed

Total article views: 2,016 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,092 771 153 2,016 136 142
  • HTML: 1,092
  • PDF: 771
  • XML: 153
  • Total: 2,016
  • BibTeX: 136
  • EndNote: 142
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,009 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,009 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Oct 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Southern Ocean phytoplankton are a key part of the carbon cycle, yet year-to-year changes in ocean productivity are poorly understood. Using model simulations, this study shows how deeper mixing in the most productive years increases nutrient supply & changes the predator-prey relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton. This helps explain why satellite productivity estimates disagree, and the reasons for why climate projections might be getting inaccurate estimates of future production.
Share