the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Duration of vegetation green-up response to snowmelt on the Tibetan Plateau
Abstract. The Tibetan Plateau (TP) is characterized by abundant snow and heightened sensitivity to climate change. Although the impact of snowmelt on vegetation green-up is well recognized, the duration of the vegetation response to snowmelt on the TP remains unclear. This study calculates the time differences between the green-up date and the start of snowmelt from 2001 to 2018 on the TP, denoted as ∆T. Exploratory spatial data analysis and Mann Kendall test were then applied to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution feature of ∆T. Subsequently, heatmaps, box plots, partial correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to examine the impact of spring mean temperature, spring total rainfall, and daily snowmelt on ∆T. The results reveal that the mean ∆T across the TP was 36.7 days, with a spatially clustered distribution: low-low clusters in the Hengduan Mountains and high-high clusters in the Bayankara and Himalayas Mountains. Additionally, ∆T shortened with increasing spring mean temperature, spring total rainfall, and daily snowmelt, which can explain 15.7 %, 16.1 %, and 25.8 % of ∆T variation, respectively. In arid areas and regions with low vegetation, daily snowmelt was the dominant factor of ∆T for 74 % and 66 % of the regions, respectively. Conversely, spring mean temperature was the predominant factor for 65 % and 59 % of humid areas and regions with high vegetation. Our findings enhance the understanding of vegetation responses to snowmelt and provide a scientific basis for further research on the stability of alpine ecosystems and the impacts of climate change on the TP.
- Preprint
(1892 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(568 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2885', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Nov 2024
reply
The manuscript titled "Duration of vegetation green-up response to snowmelt on the Tibetan Plateau" by Ni and colleagues investigates the complex interactions between spring phenology and snowmelt dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau (TP), a region noted for its ecological sensitivity to climate change. The authors employ satellite-derived phenological data along with various statistical analyses to explore the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of the time difference between snowmelt and vegetation green-up. This work offers valuable insights into TP ecosystem dynamics, aligning with the research interests of EGUsphere readers. However, there are several issues that could affect the robustness of the conclusions. The following major suggestions aim to enhance the paper’s scientific impact and clarity.
Major concerns
- The first concern pertains to the snow coverage. While the TP experiences frequent snowfall, snow cover duration can be brief due to sublimation and wind dispersal. It is essential to verify that the study areas experience sustained snow cover throughout winter, not just isolated pixels as depicted in Figure 2. Additionally, consider streamlining the main text by moving certain figures (e.g., Figures 1 and 2) to the supplementary materials.
- The second concern is about the statistical analysis. Firstly, the variables—spring mean temperature, total spring rainfall, and daily snowmelt—are likely to exhibit multicollinearity, given the interdependence of temperature/rainfall and snowmelt. A multicollinearity check is recommended to identify and potentially exclude highly correlated variables. Employing a structural equation model could provide a more nuanced understanding of these interdependencies. Secondly, the chosen significance level (p < 0.1) was too large. Despite this, a substantial number of pixels on the TP show non-significant trends, suggesting an absence of robust relationships between green-up and snowmelt. To address this, consider categorizing pixels by significance, explaining the underlying causes for these patterns in each category.
- The third concern is about the structure of results. The results section currently includes an extensive number of figures, which may hinder clarity. Consider reorganizing this section, for example, separating spatial and temporal characteristics into distinct parts and using concise figures. This restructuring could improve readability and emphasize key findings more effectively.
Minor concerns
- L15: Clarify whether you mean the "duration or date" of vegetation green-up.
- L18-19: It is unnecessary to listing all methods here.
- L50-55: too many abbreviations make this paper hard to follow
- L118: Provide more details for this treatment. For instance, if merging 10 pixels with various plant functional types (PFTs), specify which PFT the combined pixel represents. Confirm if all PFTs were included, and consider excluding bare and arable land, which lack seasonal dynamics relevant to this analysis.
- Figure 3: please make sure two figures have matched pixels and adjust the colorbar in 3b for better visibility.
- Figure 4: With 18 subplots, distinguishing annual differences is challenging. Move this figure to supplementary materials and replace it with a simplified version, such as a comparison between two periods (e.g., 2001-2009 vs. 2010-2018).
- Figure 5: Similar suggestion as Figure 4—consider a more concise format.
- The direct relationship between temperature/precipitation and green-up may be more pronounced than that of snowmelt. If so, this would suggest a lesser role for snowmelt, especially given the year-round snowfall on the Tibetan Plateau.
- Figure 7: Why the figure 7b use a different pattern unlike 7a? it is much better to testing Tspring and Sstog, and Pspring and Sstog effects on deltaT effect on ∆T separately for clarity.
- Conclusion: Condense to focus on primary findings for a stronger impact.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2885-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | 18 | 9 | 127 | 41 | 3 | 5 |
- HTML: 100
- PDF: 18
- XML: 9
- Total: 127
- Supplement: 41
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1