the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assimilation of Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system–Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0)
Abstract. Modeling and predicting changes in the function and structure of the terrestrial biosphere and its feedbacks to climate change strongly depends on our ability to accurately represent interactions of the carbon and water cycles, and energy exchange. However, carbon fluxes, hydrological status and energy exchange simulated by process-based terrestrial ecosystem models are subject to significant uncertainties, largely due to the poorly calibrated parameters related to various processes. In this work, an adjoint-based data assimilation system (Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System, NUCAS) was developed, which is capable of assimilating multiple observations to optimize process parameters of a satellite data driven ecosystem model–BEPS (Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator). Data assimilation experiments were conducted to demonstrate the robustness and to investigate the feasibility and applicability of NUCAS on seven sites by assimilating the carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes, which were tightly related to the stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Results showed that NUCAS is able to achieve a consistent fit to COS observations across various ecosystems. Comparing prior simulations with validation datasets, we found that the assimilation of COS can significantly improve the model performance in gross primary productivity, sensible heat, latent heat and even soil moisture. We also showed that the NUCAS is capable of constraining parameters from multiple sites simultaneously and achieving a good consistency to the single-site assimilation. Our results demonstrate that COS can provide strong constraints on parameters relevant to water, energy and carbon processes with the data assimilation system, and open new perspectives for better understanding of the ecosystem carbon, water and energy exchanges.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(3973 KB)
-
Supplement
(1677 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3973 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1677 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
I am commenting on your manuscript regarding the "Code Availability" section. Right now, in the section to make available your code, you mention a GitHub repository. GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing. However, in the information submitted with your manuscript, you have included a Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/record/8288751) for the same code that you linked from GitHub. This is exactly the information that should be in the "Code Availability" section, instead of the link to GitHub.
Therefore, I leave here this comment, with the link to the Zenodo repository, so that it is available to all the community for any potential review or comment on your manuscript. And please, in any potentially reviewed or accepted version of your manuscript, remove the link to GitHub and instead include the link and DOi for the Zenodo repository.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CEC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Mousong Wu, 12 Oct 2023
Thanks for pointing out this. We will only show the Zendo link in the further update of the mansucript and remove the Github link as suggested.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
Dear Juan Antonio Añel,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Â We have proceeded with including only the Zendo link in the latest version of the manuscript and have removed the GitHub link as suggested.Â
In the future, we will use the Zenodo (a repository suitable for long-term archival and publishing) link for any upcoming versions of the manuscript, instead of the GitHub link.If you have any further recommendations or requirements, please don't hesitate to let us know.Â
Best regards,
Huajie Zhu
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-AC3
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Mousong Wu, 12 Oct 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Dec 2023
Please find my detailed comments in the attached pdf file.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
I am commenting on your manuscript regarding the "Code Availability" section. Right now, in the section to make available your code, you mention a GitHub repository. GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing. However, in the information submitted with your manuscript, you have included a Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/record/8288751) for the same code that you linked from GitHub. This is exactly the information that should be in the "Code Availability" section, instead of the link to GitHub.
Therefore, I leave here this comment, with the link to the Zenodo repository, so that it is available to all the community for any potential review or comment on your manuscript. And please, in any potentially reviewed or accepted version of your manuscript, remove the link to GitHub and instead include the link and DOi for the Zenodo repository.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CEC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Mousong Wu, 12 Oct 2023
Thanks for pointing out this. We will only show the Zendo link in the further update of the mansucript and remove the Github link as suggested.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
Dear Juan Antonio Añel,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Â We have proceeded with including only the Zendo link in the latest version of the manuscript and have removed the GitHub link as suggested.Â
In the future, we will use the Zenodo (a repository suitable for long-term archival and publishing) link for any upcoming versions of the manuscript, instead of the GitHub link.If you have any further recommendations or requirements, please don't hesitate to let us know.Â
Best regards,
Huajie Zhu
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-AC3
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Mousong Wu, 12 Oct 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Dec 2023
Please find my detailed comments in the attached pdf file.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
Peer review completion
Post-review adjustments
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Model code and software
Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) Mousong Wu https://zenodo.org/record/8288751
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
589 | 152 | 49 | 790 | 64 | 33 | 28 |
- HTML: 589
- PDF: 152
- XML: 49
- Total: 790
- Supplement: 64
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 28
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Huajie Zhu
Mousong Wu
Fei Jiang
Michael Vossbeck
Thomas Kaminski
Xiuli Xing
Weimin Ju
Jing M. Chen
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3973 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1677 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper