the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mineral Dust and Pedogenesis in the Alpine Critical Zone
Abigail A. Santis
Elsa J. Soderstrom
Michael J. Tappa
Ann M. Bauer
Abstract. The influence of mineral dust deposition on soil formation in the mountain critical zone was evaluated at six sites in southwestern North America. Passive samplers collected dust for two years, and representative soil and rock were gathered in the vicinity of each dust sampler. All materials (dust, soil, and rock) were analysed to determine their mineralogy (with x-ray diffraction), geochemistry (with ICP-MS), and radiogenic isotope fingerprint (87Sr/86Sr and εNd). In addition, the grain size distribution of dust and soil samples was determined with laser scattering, and standard soil fertility analysis was conducted on the soil samples. Results reveal that minerals present in the dust, but absent in the local bedrock, are detectable in the soil. Similarly, the geochemistry and isotopic fingerprint of soil samples are more similar to dust than to local bedrock. End-member mixing models evaluating soil as a mixture of dust and rock suggest that the fine fractions of the sampled soils are dominated by dust deposition, with dust contents approaching 100 %. Dust content is somewhat higher in soils over bedrock types more resistant to weathering. These results emphasize the dominant control that mineral dust deposition can exert on pedogenesis on the mountain critical zone.
- Preprint
(4634 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(53 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Jeffrey S. Munroe et al.
Status: open (until 25 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1840', Patrice de Caritat, 04 Oct 2023
reply
This is a very well designed and described study of the composition of alpine soils in the SW USA. The focus of the study is on whether weathering local bedrock or imported eolian dust is the principal contributor to soil formation here. The study makes a convincing case for the dominant (but not exclusive) role of eolian dust. Although not a new concept, the originality of this work lies in the multitude of sites considered, the relatively large geographic area covered, and the range of lithological substrates represented.
I have marked many (mostly minor) comments in the edited PDF, which should make the paper clearer to the reader.
The three most substantive points I'd like to stress here are as follows.
1. I would like to see a more detailed description of the meteorological conditions of the area, particularly where it comes to wind and aridity parameters (dominant wind directions, strengths, seasonality; precipitation and humidity values, seasonality?).
2. This should logically extend to what is known of the geochemistry and mineralogy of the most obvious source areas for eolian dust likely to be transported over, and deposited on, the mountain region considered. Here I would like the authors for instance make use of the USGS soil geochemical landscape survey dataset (https://mrdata.usgs.gov/ds-801/; https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141082; https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2022-031).
3. The paper is quite long and much detail could be placed in the supplement. For instance the Methods could almost entirely be moved there, with minimal loss of readability.
Other than that, this is a very good contribution to understanding soil formation and putting implications into perspective. I commend the authors on an interesting and well-constructed manuscript
Jeffrey S. Munroe et al.
Jeffrey S. Munroe et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
115 | 33 | 4 | 152 | 10 | 2 | 3 |
- HTML: 115
- PDF: 33
- XML: 4
- Total: 152
- Supplement: 10
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1