the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Gravity Inversion Method to Produce Compact and Sharp Images Using L0-norm Constraint with Auto-adaptive Regularization and Combined Stopping Criteria
Abstract. We present a gravity inversion method that can produce compact and sharp images, to assist the modeling of non-smooth geologic features. The proposed iterative inversion approach makes use of L0-norm stabilizing functional, hard, and physical parameter inequality constraints, and depth weighting function. The method incorporates an auto-adaptive regularization technique, which automatically determines a suitable regularization parameter and error weighting function that helps to improve both the stability and convergence of the method. The auto-adaptive regularization and error weighting matrix are not dependent on the known noise level. Because of that, the method yields reasonable results even the noise level of the data is not known properly. The utilization of an effectively combined stopping rule to terminate the inversion process is another improvement that is introduced in this work. The capacity and the efficiency of the new inversion method were tested by inverting randomly chosen synthetic and measured data. The synthetic test models consist of multiple causative blocky bodies, with different geometries and density distributions that are vertically and horizontally distributed adjacent to each other. Inversion results of the synthetic data show that the developed method can recover models that adequately match the real geometry, location, and densities of the synthetic causative bodies. Furthermore, the testing of the improved approach using published real gravity data confirmed the potential, and practicality of the method in producing compact and sharp inverse images of the subsurface.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1282 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1282 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1202', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Dec 2022
The authors present a sparsity constrained inversion method. The technical content of the paper is good and have both synthetic and field data illustrations. However, the paper has several typo and grammatical errors. The following are my comments to the paper.
- I suggest the title be shortened to “Gravity Inversion Method Using L0-norm Constraint with Auto-adaptive Regularization and Combined Stopping Criteria”
- Could you discuss the possibility of extending the method to 3D?
- For the field data examples, can you show the conventional least square inversion results like the one shown in Fig. 7a.
- For the synthetic data examples, is the noise added in the gravity data or the model density? The description in the paper is not clear about this point.
- The noise added in the synthetic data is small. Can you show the robustness of the method by adding significant of noise in the data?
- What happens when the causative body is big in size but has a sharp boundary?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1202-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mesay Geletu Gebre, 05 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1202', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Dec 2022
Dear Editor and Authors, please see attached file.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mesay Geletu Gebre, 05 Jan 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1202', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Dec 2022
The authors present a sparsity constrained inversion method. The technical content of the paper is good and have both synthetic and field data illustrations. However, the paper has several typo and grammatical errors. The following are my comments to the paper.
- I suggest the title be shortened to “Gravity Inversion Method Using L0-norm Constraint with Auto-adaptive Regularization and Combined Stopping Criteria”
- Could you discuss the possibility of extending the method to 3D?
- For the field data examples, can you show the conventional least square inversion results like the one shown in Fig. 7a.
- For the synthetic data examples, is the noise added in the gravity data or the model density? The description in the paper is not clear about this point.
- The noise added in the synthetic data is small. Can you show the robustness of the method by adding significant of noise in the data?
- What happens when the causative body is big in size but has a sharp boundary?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1202-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mesay Geletu Gebre, 05 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1202', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Dec 2022
Dear Editor and Authors, please see attached file.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mesay Geletu Gebre, 05 Jan 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
179 | 63 | 14 | 256 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 179
- PDF: 63
- XML: 14
- Total: 256
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Mesay Geletu Gebre
Elias Lewi
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1282 KB) - Metadata XML