Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2257
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2257
23 Apr 2026
 | 23 Apr 2026

Quantitative Evaluation of Mesoscale Eddies in the North Atlantic Using Satellite Altimetry and Ocean Reanalyses

Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang

Abstract. Ocean mesoscale eddies (10–250 km) play a key role in transporting heat, momentum, and nutrients. Accurately evaluating their representation in ocean reanalysis becomes important given that ocean reanalysis is widely used in ocean and climate research due to their temporal and spatial consistent coverage. This study aims to assess two global ocean reanalysis products—GLORYS12V1 (1/12° resolution) and GLORYS2V4 (1/4° resolution) available from the Copernicus Marine Service—against satellite altimetry observations. We have used both AVISO SSALTO/DUACS (1/4°) and the higher-resolution AVISO SWOT MIOST Science product (1/8°), as reference datasets that allow us to understand better the advantage of high-resolution altimetry data and have a fair evaluation for eddy-resolving ocean reanalysis (1/12°). The evaluation approach is based on a feature-based eddy-verification method to compare eddy properties for example amplitude, radius, centroid, shape using a cost-function metric, Probability of Detection (POD) and False Alarm Ratio (FAR) are then used to quantify the reanalysis skill. GLORYS12V1 demonstrates better agreement with observations than GLORYS2V4, especially for eddies with amplitudes >10 cm. For both DUACS and SWOT MIOST Science, the POD increases by more than 30 % when moving from GLORYS2V4 to GLORYS12V1, while the FAR also rises by about 20 %, mainly due to the detection of more small and weak eddies. The hit-cost metrics also improve with SWOT, the total hit cost decreases by more than 9 %, and the amplitude error is reduced by about 6 %. Small increases in radius and distance between centroids are still observed, but these are smaller in the SWOT comparison, showing better compatibility with the high-resolution reanalysis. Overall, POD values remain above 50 % and reach around 60 % with SWOT, while FAR stays below 30 %. These results underline the added value of high model resolution for the representation mesoscale eddies in ocean reanalyses and highlight the value of wide-swath altimetry for model verification.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a guest member of the editorial board of Ocean Science for the special issue "Evaluation of ocean reanalyses to meet users' needs". The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Sep 2026
Quantitative evaluation of mesoscale eddies in the North Atlantic using satellite altimetry and ocean reanalyses
Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang
Ocean Sci., 22, 2863–2902, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2863-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2863-2026, 2026
Short summary
Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2257', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 May 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Paolo Mauriello, 17 Jul 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2257', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Jun 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Paolo Mauriello, 17 Jul 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Paolo Mauriello on behalf of the Authors (17 Jul 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Jul 2026) by Denise Fernandez
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (31 Jul 2026)
ED: Publish as is (06 Aug 2026) by Denise Fernandez
AR by Paolo Mauriello on behalf of the Authors (19 Aug 2026)  Author's response 

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2257', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 May 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Paolo Mauriello, 17 Jul 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2257', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Jun 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Paolo Mauriello, 17 Jul 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Paolo Mauriello on behalf of the Authors (17 Jul 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Jul 2026) by Denise Fernandez
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (31 Jul 2026)
ED: Publish as is (06 Aug 2026) by Denise Fernandez
AR by Paolo Mauriello on behalf of the Authors (19 Aug 2026)  Author's response 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Sep 2026
Quantitative evaluation of mesoscale eddies in the North Atlantic using satellite altimetry and ocean reanalyses
Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang
Ocean Sci., 22, 2863–2902, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2863-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2863-2026, 2026
Short summary
Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang
Paolo Mauriello, Gregory C. Smith, Andrea Storto, and Chunxue Yang

Viewed

Total article views: 614 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
354 212 48 614 34 31
  • HTML: 354
  • PDF: 212
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 614
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 589 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 589 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Oct 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
We studied how well ocean models represent ocean features by comparing them with satellite data. The high resolution model GLORYS12V1 matches observations better than GLORYS2V4, especially for strong features, but it also detects more weak ones, increasing false detections. Satellite data from DUACS and SWOT MIOST Science improve the evaluation and help compare models and observations. These results show that higher detail is important to better understand ocean dynamics.
Share