the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global patterns and drivers of climate-driven fires in a warming world
Abstract. Wildfires increasingly threaten human lives, ecosystems, and climate, yet a comprehensive understanding of the factors driving their future dynamics and emissions remains elusive, hampering mitigation efforts. In this study, we assessed how future climate change would influence global burned area (BA) and carbon emissions between 2015 to 2100. Using the Community Land Model (version 5) with active biogeochemistry and fire, we simulated the effects of climate drivers such as temperature, precipitation, and CO2 levels under two future pathways (low warming, SSP1-2.6, and high warming, SSP3-7.0). Our model reproduces historical BA magnitude and spatial distribution, projecting a global BA increase of +6400 km2 yr–1 under SSP1-2.6 and +7500 km2 yr–1 under SSP3-7.0. While tropical regions remain nearly stable, boreal regions experience the most significant rise, with BA increasing by +5200 km2 yr-1 in SSP1-2.6 and +8500 km2 yr-1 in SSP3-7.0, an overall increase of 200 %. This rise is accompanied by increased carbon emissions of +4 Tg yr-1 and +7 Tg yr-1 under SSP1-2.6 and SSP3-7.0, respectively. The main drivers of these changes are reduced soil moisture and increased fuel supply (i.e., vegetation carbon) under a warming climate, with CO2 fertilization enhancing biomass growth and further contributing to higher fire risks. These findings underscore the need for integrating climate-driven wildfire dynamics into global management and policy frameworks to mitigate future fire-related threats.
- Preprint
(6783 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(7482 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-804', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Mar 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hemraj Bhattarai, 17 Jun 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-804/egusphere-2025-804-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hemraj Bhattarai, 17 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-804', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Apr 2025
This is a very well-written and clear article. The conclusions are of scientific interest, however, before publication further validation of the temporal trends under current conditions as well as the impact of holding socio-economic variables constant is needed.
Major comments
The authors have chosen to hold socio-economic activity constant in this paper, to isolate out the climate and vegetation effects of climate change on burnt area. Whilst this is a defendable and useful counter-factual set up, more discussion is needed as to the effect of this choice on the results. More specifically:
- The authors state that the model can reproduce current patterns in burnt area, but this validation appears to be only spatial. However, a validation of the temporal trends and the model’s ability to reproduce current trends is needed given that this study performs a transient temporal analysis.
- Furthermore, given the fact that the current declining global trend in burnt area has been attributed to changes in human activity, and that this study holds human activity constant, a quantification is needed to assess the impact this choice will have on trends.
- It would be nice to see the temporal trend of simulated BA between 2015 and 2024 with a) the socio-economic variables varying, b) the socio-economic variables held constant.
- The impact of human activity in each region could then be quantified by taking the difference in these two simulations. This would allow a discussion of regions in which we expect that the results shown here (climate effect only) to be the driving trend and regions in which, given that human activity is a significant driver, the results presented here should be taken with more caution.
Given that the largest increases of burnt area and emissions are in the northern latitudes, regions in which we expect human activity to have very little impact, this exercise would strengthen your conclusions. Furthermore, another interesting result is the fact that this analysis shows decreases in many regions, including the tropics, despite holding human activity constant.
Minor comments
Line 258 “In any case, tropical fires dominate the global landscape for both BA and carbon emissions, compared to boreal fires.” – this sentence is quite unclear, could you please rephrase.
Line 342 “In contrast, tropical regions show a decrease in BA as increased precipitation dampens fire activity.” – could this not lead to increases in fuel loading, as it does in the northern high latitudes? More detailed discussion as to why decreases are shown in these regions are needed. Furthermore, what causes the large decrease in extra-tropical regions (e.g. eastern United States, United Kingdom and northern Europe, regions of Russia?). More detailed discussion of what is driving decreases in burnt area globally is needed here.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-804-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Hemraj Bhattarai, 17 Jun 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-804/egusphere-2025-804-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-804', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 May 2025
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Hemraj Bhattarai, 17 Jun 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-804/egusphere-2025-804-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Hemraj Bhattarai, 17 Jun 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
544 | 106 | 18 | 668 | 23 | 13 | 15 |
- HTML: 544
- PDF: 106
- XML: 18
- Total: 668
- Supplement: 23
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1