Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Longitudinal Wave Power as a Proxy for Coastal Change Detection
Marta Aragón,Óscar Ferreira,Alejandro López-Ruiz,and Miguel Ortega-Sánchez
Abstract. Coastal areas are subject to atmospheric, fluvial and marine hazards that can cause relevant morphological changes. Wave height (Hs) is the most commonly used climate variable to define morphological changes in coastal engineering studies. However, this approach fails to capture directional effects, which are essential for predicting and managing shoreline erosion and associated risks. This work introduces a methodology that identifies relevant morphological changes (morphological events) by using the longitudinal wave power (LWP), after defining an optimized Peak Over Threshold (POT) value. The morphological evolution of an idealized river mouth was simulated using the Delft3D numerical model and six different wave climate conditions along with tidal and river flow conditions. The optimized LWP approach performed better than Hs in identifying morphological changes, providing a better agreement between climatological and morphological events. By considering both erosional and accretional processes, this LWP-based methodology offers coastal managers a robust, physics-based tool for predicting morphological responses to wave conditions, supporting the development of early warning systems on inlet-adjacent shorelines.
Received: 20 Nov 2025 – Discussion started: 22 Dec 2025
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
This study defines optimized Peak Over Threshold (POT) parameters and utilizing Longitudinal Wave Power (LWP) to identify significant morphological changes. The authors employed the Delft3D numerical model to simulate the morphological evolution of an idealized river mouth. This is an interesting work. However, there are some concerns regarding the absence of field validation, the significant simplification of model assumptions, and a potential over-reliance on specific parameters. Therefore, I recommend a Major Revision. Potentially useful suggestions are listed below:
While the authors have cited extensive literature on storm erosion, there appears to be limited discussion on existing studies that also utilize Wave Power or Energy Flux for prediction purposes. Expanding this section would strengthen the context.
It is recommended that the authors also highlight the deficiencies of existing statistical methods, rather than solely focusing on the neglect of physical processes.
Lines 119-120; Table 1: Table 1 shows that the mean significant wave height (Hs) for six selected years is very similar (1.00m - 1.11m). Does this limit the testing of the method under extremely variable climates?
Lines 135-136; Line 576: A constant river discharge of 10 m3/s is used in the model setup. However, in reality, storm events causing significant wave height changes often coincide with heavy rainfall and high river discharge. Neglecting the surge in discharge during storms might lead to a misinterpretation of the storm events and their driving mechanisms.
Lines 210-213; Lines 588-590: This study is entirely based on an idealized numerical model. Although the authors acknowledge the lack of field data comparison in Section 5.3, without empirical data validation, the so-called "optimal POT parameter combination" (95th percentile, 4-day independence, etc.) might merely be an artifact of the specific model settings. It is suggested that the authors at least discuss the robustness of these optimal parameters if model settings (such as friction coefficients or diffusion coefficients) were to change.
Table 2; Lines 253-255: The independence criterion in Table 2 tests intervals of 2, 3, and 4 days. However, for certain storm clusters, the interval might be less than 2 days. Why were shorter intervals (e.g., 24 or 36 hours) not tested?
Lines 320-324: The method defines a "match" if the wave height is observed within 24 hours after a climatic event. This 24-hour time lag seems to lack a strong physical or statistical basis. The authors should provide a sensitivity analysis or cite relevant literature to support this specific timeframe.
Lines 420-425: The results show that in some cases, LWP misses certain events. In the Discussion section, it would be more balanced to point out that LWP serves as a complementary proxy to Hs for capturing directional events, rather than implying it can completely replace Hs. The current phrasing occasionally appears too dismissive of Hs.
Coastal erosion is a global concern. Traditional approaches ignore the directional force of waves. The new approach here presented uses Longitudinal Wave Power (LWP) to better link wave conditions to coastal changes. Through numerical simulations and extreme analysis, LWP was concluded to be a superior variable for assessing coastal natural hazards, achieving 86 % prediction accuracy. This tool provides planners with a more reliable way to forecast shifting shorelines and manage coastal zones.
Coastal erosion is a global concern. Traditional approaches ignore the directional force of...
This study defines optimized Peak Over Threshold (POT) parameters and utilizing Longitudinal Wave Power (LWP) to identify significant morphological changes. The authors employed the Delft3D numerical model to simulate the morphological evolution of an idealized river mouth. This is an interesting work. However, there are some concerns regarding the absence of field validation, the significant simplification of model assumptions, and a potential over-reliance on specific parameters. Therefore, I recommend a Major Revision. Potentially useful suggestions are listed below: