Preprints
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5351628
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5351628
06 Nov 2025
 | 06 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

PV power modelling using solar radiation from ground-based measurements and CAMS: Assessing the diffuse component related uncertainties leveraging the Global Solar Energy Estimator (GSEE)

Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Antonis Gkikas, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Andreas Kazantzidis, Stelios Kazadzis, Stefan Pfenninger, John Kapsomenakis, Kostas Eleftheratos, Athanassios A. Argiriou, Lionel Doppler, and Christos S. Zerefos

Abstract. Accurate PV power production modelling requires precise knowledge of the distribution of solar irradiance among its direct and diffuse components. Since this information is rarely available, this requirement can be addressed through the use of diffuse fraction models. In this study, we try to quantify the errors in PV modelling when measurements of the diffuse solar irradiance are not available. For this purpose, we use total and diffuse solar irradiance data obtained from ground-based measurements of BSRN to simulate the PV electric output using GSEE. We have chosen five sites in Europe and North Africa, with different prevailing conditions, where BSRN measurements are available. GSEE incorporates an implementation of the BRL diffuse fraction model, along with a Climate Data Interface that enables simulations across different time scales. We evaluate the capability of BRL in providing accurate estimations of the diffuse fraction under diverse atmospheric conditions, with particular attention on the presence of clouds and aerosols and assess the extent to which its associated errors propagate to energy production modelling. Furthermore, we compare GSEE outputs when using CAMS radiation time-series as input instead of ground-based measurements, to quantify the impact of the CAMS radiation product uncertainties in PV modelling.

Share
Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Antonis Gkikas, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Andreas Kazantzidis, Stelios Kazadzis, Stefan Pfenninger, John Kapsomenakis, Kostas Eleftheratos, Athanassios A. Argiriou, Lionel Doppler, and Christos S. Zerefos

Status: open (until 12 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Antonis Gkikas, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Andreas Kazantzidis, Stelios Kazadzis, Stefan Pfenninger, John Kapsomenakis, Kostas Eleftheratos, Athanassios A. Argiriou, Lionel Doppler, and Christos S. Zerefos
Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Antonis Gkikas, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Andreas Kazantzidis, Stelios Kazadzis, Stefan Pfenninger, John Kapsomenakis, Kostas Eleftheratos, Athanassios A. Argiriou, Lionel Doppler, and Christos S. Zerefos
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We assess PV power modelling uncertainty linked to the use of the BRL diffuse fraction model. We perform simulations with GSEE, which includes the BRL model, with input from BSRN and CAMS. The simulations are validated under diverse conditions, with aerosol defined using AERONET. Results show that the BRL is reliable under most conditions but can lead to overestimations of PV output during dust events. CAMS-based simulations closely match ground measurements, confirming the robustness of GSEE.
Share