the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Sea Ice Albedo Bounded Data Assimilation and Its Impact on Modeling: A Regional Approach
Abstract. We conducted a perfect model experiment using Icepack, a one-dimensional single-column sea ice model, to assess the potential of data assimilation (DA) to improve predictions of the mean sea ice state through the incorporation of sea ice albedo (SIAL) observations. One ensemble member is designated as the TRUTH, and synthetic observations drawn from it are assimilated into the remaining ensemble members. DA is carried out using the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART) with a bounded Quantile Conserving Ensemble Filtering Framework (QCEFF), which accounts for the bounded nature of sea ice variables. Icepack ensembles were spun-up for four Arctic locations based on small perturbations to atmospheric forcing. Results show that assimilating SIAL yields comparable or superior performance to more commonly assimilated observables such as sea ice concentration (SIC) and thickness (SIT) in three-quarters of the Arctic regions studied, and across all regions when observational uncertainty in SIAL is reduced below estimates from the current literature. These findings underscore the value of leveraging existing SIAL observations and expanding their temporal and spatial coverage in the Arctic. Furthermore, the study highlights the critical need to better constrain the observational uncertainty of SIAL. Enhanced observational networks would provide the necessary validation data, enabling more accurate uncertainty characterization and improved sea ice forecasts in a rapidly evolving polar climate.
- Preprint
(14615 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(968 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Sep 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2540', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Sep 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2540', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Sep 2025
reply
This study investigates the impact of assimilating sea ice albedo (SIAL) on Arctic sea ice prediction using a series of perfect model experiments. The work is well-structured and addresses a relevant topic in data assimilation using the Quantile Conserving Ensemble Filtering Framework (QCEFF). The objective to evaluate the impact of SIAL assimilation on sea ice forecasts is clearly stated. The authors selected four diverse Arctic regions and use Icepack model for the assimilation with spin-up period (2000-2010) and experimental timeframe (2011-2015). The manuscript presents interesting results, particularly regarding the complementary benefits of multi-parameter assimilation. Several aspects of the experimental design and presentation could be clarified to strengthen the manuscript.
Â
Specific comments
- Ensemble generation
The authors mentioned how to construct the ensemble but only in the abstract and L74 without details. It would be valuable to know the details on the ensemble generation, and elaborate in the Method section.
- Observation uncertainty
The assumptions for observation uncertainty are highly consequential for the DA results (Line ~170). The chosen setup—a parabolic distribution for SIC, 10% for SIT, and zero uncertainty at the bounds (0% and 100% SIC, 0m SIT)—is a common simplification but has significant implications. Setting uncertainty to zero forces the model to exactly match the observation at these bounds. This can lead to overconfidence and an artificial reduction in ensemble spread, potentially skewing the results. The authors could clarify this choice in the Methods or Discussion section.  A strong recommendation for future work would be to adopt a more realistic uncertainty that avoids zero uncertainty, for instance, by specifying a minimum uncertainty floor (e.g., 1-2%) for SIC at 0% and 100%.
- Interpretation of SIAL vs. SIC assimilation results
The central conclusion that SIAL assimilation outperforms SIC assimilation under low uncertainty is compelling. However, this advantage may be partially confounded by the differential uncertainty settings applied to each variable. SIAL's assigned uncertainty is likely low (though not explicitly stated in the provided text), while SIC's uncertainty is structurally defined by a parabola, which is higher everywhere except the bounds. A fairer comparison would require testing SIC assimilation under similarly low uncertainty assumptions. The authors may state this potential confounding factor in the discussion (e.g., around Line 306).
- Multi-parameter assimilation
The finding that the simultaneous assimilation of SIC, SIT, and SIAL yields the best performance is a key result. The complementarity between these variables, as likely illustrated in Figure 4, is a highly valuable insight. This multi-parameter complementarity deserves to be highlighted and discussed in greater depth as a major takeaway of the study, perhaps exploring the physical reasons behind why the constraints provided by these variables are non-redundant.
- Region-specific behavior of albedo (Section 4.3)
The identified unique albedo evolution for category `n=1` ice in the Chukchi Sea is interesting. Is there any reason for that? the formation of melt ponds? why is it pronounced in this region and not others.
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2540-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,144 | 20 | 4 | 1,168 | 15 | 36 | 41 |
- HTML: 1,144
- PDF: 20
- XML: 4
- Total: 1,168
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 36
- EndNote: 41
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please see the attached file.