Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1863
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1863
19 May 2025
 | 19 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Can we reliably estimate precipitation with high resolution during disastrously large floods?

Jan Szturc, Anna Jurczyk, Katarzyna Ośródka, Agnieszka Kurcz, Magdalena Szaton, Mariusz Figurski, and Robert Pyrc

Abstract. A huge and dangerous flood occurred in September 2024 in the upper and middle Odra river basin, including mountainous areas in south-western Poland. The widespread precipitation lasted about four days, reaching more than 200 mm daily. In order to verify the possibilities of precise estimation of the precipitation field, different measurement techniques were analysed: rain gauge data, weather radar-based, satellite-based, non-conventional (CML-based) and multi-source estimates. Apart from real-time and near real-time data, later available reanalyses based on satellite information (IMERG, PDIR-Now) and numerical mesoscale model simulations (ERA5, WRF) were also examined. Manual rain gauge data for daily accumulations and multi-source RainGRS estimates for hourly accumulations were used as references to evaluate the reliability of the various techniques for measurements and estimation of precipitation accumulations. Statistical analyses and visual comparisons were carried out. Among the data available in real time the best results were found for rain gauge measurements, radar data adjusted to rain gauges, and RainGRS estimates. Fairly good reliability was achieved by non-conventional CML-based measurements. In terms of offline reanalyses, mesoscale model simulations also demonstrated reasonably good agreement with reference precipitation, while poorer results were obtained by all satellite-based estimates except the IMERG.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Jan Szturc, Anna Jurczyk, Katarzyna Ośródka, Agnieszka Kurcz, Magdalena Szaton, Mariusz Figurski, and Robert Pyrc

Status: open (until 11 Jul 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jan Szturc, Anna Jurczyk, Katarzyna Ośródka, Agnieszka Kurcz, Magdalena Szaton, Mariusz Figurski, and Robert Pyrc
Jan Szturc, Anna Jurczyk, Katarzyna Ośródka, Agnieszka Kurcz, Magdalena Szaton, Mariusz Figurski, and Robert Pyrc

Viewed

Total article views: 124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
97 23 4 124 6 5
  • HTML: 97
  • PDF: 23
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 124
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 122 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 122 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
During the flooding of the Oder River in Sep 2024, daily rainfall exceeded 200 mm. The reliability of high-resolution rainfall estimates available in real time was assessed: from rain gauges, radars, satellites, unconventional & multi-source, also reanalyses. Rain gauges, adjusted radar & multi-source estimates showed the highest accuracy, unconventional methods slightly lower. Numerical weather prediction models still offered reasonable reliability, but satellite estimates were less effective.
Share