the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Vegetation and climate changes at the Early-Late Pliocene Transition around the Mediterranean basin: A case from the Burdur Basin in Southwestern Anatolia
Abstract. The Pliocene (5.33–2.58 Ma), particularly the Early-Late Pliocene transition (~3.6 Ma), is a key period for understanding future climate change linked to increases in greenhouse gases. Around the Western Mediterranean basin, the Early-Late Pliocene transition was marked by the establishment of a Mediterranean climate with summer droughts, cool/wet winters and latitudinal gradients. However, environmental changes in the eastern part of the Mediterranean area during the Early-Late Pliocene transition have rarely been documented. Here, we propose to reconstruct the environmental and climate changes during the Early-Late Pliocene transition from the Lake Burdur sequence, located in Southwestern Türkiye. The aim of this study is to characterize the vegetation, lake dynamics, and water level changes based on pollen and Non-Pollen Palynomorph (NPP) proxies, to quantitatively reconstruct climate changes using a multimethod approach (Modern Analogue Technique, Weighted Averaging Partial Least Squares regression, Random Forest, and Boosted Regression Trees and Climatic Amplitude Method) and morphologically characterize the large pollen grains of Poaceae (Cerealia-type).
The results indicate that, during the Early-Late Pliocene transition at Burdur, the vegetation was dominated by steppes with Poaceae, Artemisia, and Amaranthaceae. Subsequently, arboreal taxa decreased and a alternation between steppe grasslands with deciduous Quercus and steppes dominated by Amaranthaceae became evident. Large Poaceae pollen grains (Cerealia-type) are recorded in the Burdur sequence, but their percentages are lower than those at Acıgöl, a nearby record dated to the Pleistocene. The morphological characteristics of these large Poaceae pollen grains from Burdur are similar to those of domesticated cereals from recent periods, preventing a clear distinction between wild and domesticated Poaceae pollen. The lacustrine ecosystem was characterized by semi-aquatic vegetation and freshwater algae, exhibiting alternating oligotrophic and eutrophic conditions. Climate reconstructions of Burdur show similar trends across different methods, with reconstructed values during the Early-Late transition being close to present-day values. Following a climatic optimum in precipitation and temperature, climate reconstructions indicate an alternation between cool, wet conditions and warmer, drier conditions during the Late Pliocene in Southwestern Anatolia. Around the Mediterranean Basin, climate reconstructions during the Early Pliocene show warmer conditions compared to modern values and a north-south gradient in terms of precipitation, with wetter conditions in the north in comparison to the south. The Late Pliocene is characterized by colder conditions, and more humid conditions in the Western Mediterranean, while Türkyie and Central Asia experienced more arid conditions.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Climate of the Past.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(2172 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(156 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-174', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Mar 2025
reply
Dear Authors,
Presenting palynological data from the Burdur region and revealing climate and vegetation findings specific to this area in your study is highly valuable. Such studies make significant contributions to understanding regional paleoenvironmental changes. However, there are some shortcomings and areas that need improvement in your study. Addressing the points mentioned below will make your work more comprehensive and robust.
Your study presents a variety of analyses and methods, which is commendable. However, these methods do not appear to be well connected in the discussion section. Each method provides an independent evaluation, but a cohesive overall conclusion has not been clearly established. Strengthening the connections between the different analyses would enhance the clarity and impact of your findings.
Additionally, the palynological data from the Burdur area alone can not fully represent the broader Eastern Mediterranean. This statement appears in multiple parts of your manuscript and could benefit from some revision.
In your study, you mention that Pliocene palynological studies in Anatolia are limited to the Ericek area. However, a more detailed literature review may reveal additional studies. To support this, I have included a few references that may be useful.
After reviewing your manuscript, I would also recommend reconsidering the title. Your study focuses on the palynological, palaeoclimatic, and palaeovegetational data from a borehole in Burdur, with comparisons to European vegetation. Adjusting the title to better reflect this scope could improve clarity for readers.
Moreover, while various methods were applied, they are not clearly interconnected in the discussion section. For example, the relationship of the PCA analysis to the overall study could be more explicitly addressed.
Finally, the manuscript currently lacks geological and sedimentological information regarding the drilling log. Clarifying where the samples were taken along the log and providing additional geological context would greatly strengthen the study.
In essence, this proposed publication is a detailed palynoflora description of the Burdur region, which is the only area belonging to GB Anatolia, comparison of these data with the published Western Mediterranean basins, comparison with the study only in the Ericek area although there are other Pliocene-aged floras from Anatolia, and comparison of the pollen records of the Black Sea in the study within the scope of the Mediterranean Basin. Although it contains important data for the Burdur area, I respectfully inform you that I cannot accept it because the study requires restructuring, adding sections (e.g. geology section), editing, adding a discussion section (by making a more detailed literature review) and editing the figures.
Regards
Reviewer
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-174', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Mar 2025
reply
I read with great interest the article " Vegetation and climate changes at the Early-Late Pliocene Transition around the Mediterranean Basin: A case from the Burdur Basin in Southwestern Anatolia" submitted by Robles and co-authors for publication in Climate of the Past. This is a key article for understanding the response of vegetation and climate in the Mediterranean in a climate system in equilibrium with CO2 levels similar to those of today. This topic is therefore of crucial importance, especially since regional climate divisions must be documented everywhere to understand their interactions.
I appreciate the effort put into carrying out the difficult palynological analyses of ancient sediments, as well as the data processing (PCA) and model-data comparison. The presentation of the results is very careful, whether in diagrams, summary tables, and their legends. The content of the article is generally clear, although it can still be improved thanks to the suggestions I offer below. The climate reconstructions are carried out seriously. The English seems rigorous to me, and the text is pleasant to read.
In my main comments, I recommend the following.
• The topic of protocereals seems well introduced to me, it is also well documented, and, in my opinion, it should be moved everywhere at the end of the sections on vegetation, whether in the objectives listed in the introduction or in the discussion, which is already the case in the sections on methods and results. It is more natural.
• I agree with the authors on the application of climate reconstruction methods in the conditions in which they are carried out here, i.e. without relict taxa and after the comparison showing that the west-east gradient is also marked for the study period. It is quite surprising how close the reconstructed values, regardless of the method used, are to current values, but it ultimately makes sense in view of the reconstructed pollen assemblages, or even the previous conclusions of the work carried out by Suc. I would have liked a comparison with external data in a graphical form. This is discussed in the section "Climate changes around the Mediterranean basin" but would in my opinion deserve a figure. For example, SST, isotopes on foraminifera in the eastern Mediterranean. This seems possible since the authors are confident in the ages assigned to the sequence studied.
• I find that the model-data comparison section is under-exploited and could be further emphasized to justify the ambition displayed by the title and the targeted journal. This comparison must be present in the abstract, listed in the objectives of the introduction, its methodology rigorously explained and a separate section (therefore with a title) devoted to it in the discussion.Given the added value of this study, I strongly recommend its publication, with the few modifications mentioned above.
Here are a few minor remarks:
• Part 5.2 Wetland dynamic
How does the dynamic observed from pollen and NPP adjust with sediment and the presence of shells stated in Figure 2? I would like a few lines explaining it.
• Part 5.3
I suggest to retitle this part “Vegetation change and plant diversity around the Mediterranean Basin” and add a table S4 with the list of all taxa determined in your study in order to understand how this site compare with others and the discussion and table S3.Below I detail the minor changes:
Line 67-69 : It is not stated why relevant for your study. Do they characterized the Pliocene Transition? : “ Moreover, two major cooling events characterized the Early-Late Pliocene transition, the MIS MG12 at ~3.58 Ma and the MIS M2 at ~3.3 Ma (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005; De Schepper et al., 2014).”
Line 75: …region is poorly documented.
Line 91: Despite the fragmentary character of the information available, it seems that, prior to …
Line 138: there and below, can you please better explain when talking about modern lake Burdur or paleolake Burdur in Burdur Basin.
Figure 1: add a scale.
Line 177: in part 2.1, it is said sediment is “alluvialfan, fluvial and lacustrine deposits” which slightly different here. Can you please homogenise here or in part 2.1 and elsexhere (part 3.1 for example…)?
Line 212: were the measurements done on all Poaceae grains or in all samples where there is Poaceae grains?
Line 245 or 251: Check and correct reference(s) from Dugerdil.
Figure 2: A log presenting the sediment itself is needed here or in figure 3.
Line 351 Change Türkiye
Line 360: Precise in the caption that AP is here an average for the PAZ
Line 488: A large grain diameter is not necessarily associated with a large annulus or a large
pore. Replace by “The size of grain diameter is not correlated with annulus and pore sizes” and add correlation values to assert this information.
Figure 6: grey dashed lines (PAZ) are not easy to see, reinforce their color.
Line 535: Our pollen sampling?
Line 536: I don’t understand this sentence stating that cyclicities and magnetic. Rephrase it.
Line 546 and 566: salinity is usually expressed in ‰.
Line 613: rephrase this “steppe vegetation is dominated by Poaceae, Amaranthaceae, Artemisia, is recorded”
Line 702: Cupressaceae? Do you mean Taxodiaceae? Cf Table S3
Line 854 supress )
Line 855 There is an error here because Fig 5 or S2 are not presenting correlation values. But it is a good idea to actually give the correlation values.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-174-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
107 | 21 | 5 | 133 | 17 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 107
- PDF: 21
- XML: 5
- Total: 133
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 38 | 25 |
France | 2 | 24 | 16 |
Turkey | 3 | 20 | 13 |
China | 4 | 18 | 12 |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 38