Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1623
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1623
26 Jun 2025
 | 26 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Decoupling Urban and Non-Urban Landslides for Susceptibility Mapping in Transitional Landscapes

Zakaria Matougui, Yacine Mohamed Daksi, Mehdi Dib, and Chaouki Benabbas

Abstract. This study develops a framework for decoupling and investigating urban and non-urban landslide mechanisms, focusing on Constantine, Algeria, a city with complex topography and high landslide susceptibility. The region presents a heterogeneous landscape, where dense urban zones coexist with bare rural areas, influencing slope stability differently. A landslide inventory of 184 events was compiled and classified into urban and non-urban categories. Using geospatial data (topography, hydrology, landcover, lithology) and machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Logistic Regression), landslide susceptibility maps were generated for three datasets: urban, non-urban, and mixed. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation and evaluation metrics (ROC-AUC, F1-score, precision, recall), while SHAP analysis provided insights into factor importance. The results reveal distinct landslide drivers across environments. In urban areas, landslides are primarily influenced by aspect, slope, and proximity to streams, while distance to roads plays a lesser role, likely due to engineered slopes and drainage infrastructure. In non-urban areas, distance to roads is the most critical factor, highlighting the destabilising effects of road cuts in rural landscapes. Slope and proximity to streams remain key determinants, with lithology playing a more significant role in naturally driven failures. This study underscores the importance of context-specific landslide modelling and the potential biases of using mixed urban and non-urban inventories. The findings provide actionable insights for targeted mitigation, land-use planning, and infrastructure design. By distinguishing between urban and non-urban landslides, this research bridges critical gaps in understanding landslide dynamics across diverse landscapes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Zakaria Matougui, Yacine Mohamed Daksi, Mehdi Dib, and Chaouki Benabbas

Status: open (until 09 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Zakaria Matougui, Yacine Mohamed Daksi, Mehdi Dib, and Chaouki Benabbas
Zakaria Matougui, Yacine Mohamed Daksi, Mehdi Dib, and Chaouki Benabbas

Viewed

Total article views: 101 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
87 9 5 101 7 5 6
  • HTML: 87
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 101
  • Supplement: 7
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 100 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 100 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
In a context of urban expansion and a reduction in the available land for construction, preventive studies against landslides are required. Using field surveys, remote sensing and context-specific models, we studied the risk of landslides in an example of a transitional region. Our models reveal the likelihood of slope failure under varying natural and human pressures, guiding better land management to promote sustainable growth. These insights support safer development in fragile landscapes.
Share