Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1201
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1201
19 May 2025
 | 19 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Evaluating mass flow meter measurements from chambers for greenhouse gas emission from orphan wells and other point sources

Karl B. Haase and Nicholas J. Gianoutsos

Abstract. This study evaluates the performance of a rigid gas flux chamber equipped with a mass flow meter (MFM) for measuring gas emissions from leaking orphan wells and similar pressure-driven gas point sources. We conducted a series of laboratory and field experiments to evaluate the sensitivity, stability, and dynamic range of an MFM chamber system and found an optimal method for sealing the chamber to the ground to isolate the emission source. From these results, we estimate the effects of different soil gas permeabilities on measurements and identify the uncertainty of environmental processes that can impact measurements. Simulations of an MFM chamber are compared to those of a dynamic flux chamber to contrast the data derived with both methodologies and illustrate the potential for measuring high variability leaks with the MFM chamber. Using a low flow resistance MFM and a chamber well-sealed to the ground, it is possible to measure leaks down to 1.08 ×10-3 cubic meters per hour (m3/h) (0 °C/1 atm; STP), corresponding to 0.77 grams per hour (g/h) methane or 2.11 g/h carbon dioxide, with a mean uncertainty of 0.89 % relative standard deviation. Environmental processes such as heated gas inside the chamber from solar gain, wind blowing across the chamber vent, and changing humidity in the chamber, can cause variation in MFM measurements. Over 11 days of continuous monitoring under varying weather conditions, the standard deviation of the environmentally sourced signals was found to be 7.40 10-3 m3/h (equivalent to or 5.27 g/h methane or 14.45 g/h carbon dioxide). Strategies to obtain the highest quality data from MFM chambers include burying the edges of the chamber below the surface sufficiently deep to seal the chamber edges against gas flow and soaking the dirt with water to lower the chances of escaping gases, while monitoring the gas flow and adjusting the chamber seal to achieve a maximum flow rate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Karl B. Haase and Nicholas J. Gianoutsos

Status: open (until 24 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Karl B. Haase and Nicholas J. Gianoutsos
Karl B. Haase and Nicholas J. Gianoutsos

Viewed

Total article views: 187 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
139 44 4 187 12 4 7
  • HTML: 139
  • PDF: 44
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 187
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 171 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 171 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
This work demonstrates a simple approach for using mass flow meters connected to rigid chambers for measuring gas emissions rates in situations the meter cannot be attached directly, such as orphan oil and gas wells. This paper shows the results of performance testing, demonstrates common sources of uncertainty, and provides suggestions for how to use the approach to generate the best quality data. The findings can be used by researchers, the petroleum industry, regulators, and carbon markets.
Share