the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bias Correcting Regional Scale Earth Systems Model Projections: Novel Approach using Empirical Mode Decomposition
Abstract. Bias correction is a crucial step in using Earth systems model outputs for assessments, as it adjusts systematic errors by comparing the model to observations. However, standard methods – ranging from mean-based linear scaling to distribution-based quantile mapping typically treat bias correction as a single-scale process, overlooking the fact that biases can manifest differently across daily, seasonal, and annual timescales. In this study, we propose a novel, timescale-aware bias-correction approach built on Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD). By decomposing the meteorological signal into multiple oscillatory components and aggregating them to represent distinct timescales, we apply targeted corrections to each component, thereby preserving both short- and long-term structure in the data. Experimental validations demonstrate that this finer-grained method substantially improves upon existing bias-correction techniques such as quantile mapping. As a result, the proposed approach offers a more robust path to accurate and reliable Earth systems projections, strengthening their utility for resilience and adaptation planning.
- Preprint
(20368 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 May 2025)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1112 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 08 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlYou have archived your code on a Git site in a server hosted by the Argonne National Laboratory. However, it is not a suitable repository for scientific publication and as a result your manuscript does not comply with the policy of our journal. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy.
We ask you to publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories listed in our policy and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible.
Something similar applies to the data. You have not published the necessary specific data to replicate the work presented in your manuscript, but simply point out to a data portal hosted by the ANL. We can not accept it, first, because again it is not a suitable repository for scientific publication; Secondly, because it does not identify clearly the exact data that you have used, making hard to get access to it for readers. Therefore, you must deposit the necessary input and output data from your work in one of the suitable repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (again, link and permanent identifier).
Also, you must include a modified 'Code and Data Availability' section in a potentially reviewed manuscript, containing the information for the new repositories. Also, I have to note that the Git site for the Python scripts does not have a license listed. If you do not include a license the code remains your property, and nobody can use it. Therefore, when uploading your code to the repository, please, choose a free software/open-source (FLOSS) license. For example, if you use the GPLv3 you simply need to include the file 'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt' as LICENSE.txt with your code. Also, you can choose other options such as: GPLv2, Apache License, MIT License, etc.
Finally, I have to note that if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 19 Apr 2025
reply
Thank you for highlighting the gaps in our code and data availability section. We recognize the importance of full compliance with GMD’s Code and Data Policy. We are currently preparing a public GitHub repository (under an open‑source license) for EMDBC, as well as a Zenodo archive for all input and output data supporting our manuscript. We expect both to be finalized by early next week and will post the DOI links here as soon as they are available.
In the meantime, could you please advise us on the procedure for updating the existing preprint on the GMD server with the revised Code and Data Availability section once our repositories are live? Should we send the updated manuscript directly to the GMD editorial office via email, or is there a different mechanism to replace the preprint?
Thank you for your assistance. We look forward to bringing our submission into full compliance.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 19 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Given your reply, I have to insist that Git repositories are not suitable for scientific publication. In your reply you say that you are preparing a new GitHub repository, and this is not going to solve the pending issues with your manuscript. It is necessary that all the code is hosted in a long term repository suitable for scientific publication, such as the Zenodo one that you mention you will use for the data.
At this stage you do not need to update your manuscript, but reply to this comment with the information for the repositories (link and permanent identifiers (e.g.DOI)) where you have deposited both code and data, and a tentative new text for the "Code and Data Availability" section. In this way the information will be public and available to anyone. If your manuscript undergoes additional peer-review, and the Topical Editor ask you for a reviewed version of it, or accepts it for publication, you will have the opportunity to modify the manuscript in such stage.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 24 Apr 2025
reply
Dear Mr. Añel,
Thank you for your clarification. We agree that the GitHub repository alone does not meet GMD’s Code and Data Policy requirements. In response to your comment, we have created a Zenodo repository that includes a frozen version of our codebase and the full dataset used in the manuscript. Accordingly, we have updated the “Code and Data Availability” section, which now reads:
'''
All Python scripts for the Empirical Mode Decomposition-based Bias Correction, the full-domain WRF-CCSM dataset used in this manuscript, and the validation areas mapping WRF-CCSM indices to 25×25 case study regions are available in a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15244202 (Ganguli et al., 2025). Livneh daily CONUS observational data (Livneh et al., 2013), provided by NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (NOAA-PSL) in Boulder, Colorado, USA, are available at https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.livneh.html (NOAA-PSL, 2013). For Livneh, daily mean temperatures are computed as the average of the daily minimum and maximum values. Finally, the Empirical Mode Decomposition-based Bias Correction code is also available in the EMDBC GitHub repository at https://github.com/jeremyfifty9/emdbc (Ganguli and Feinstein, 2025).
'''As Zenodo requires a formal publication step to finalize the repository, we have generated a shareable draft link for editors, reviewers, and the public to preview. Should the manuscript be accepted, we will formally publish the Zenodo archive to finalize the citation. In the meantime, the draft version can be accessed at the following link:https://zenodo.org/records/15244202?preview=1&token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpZCI6IjA2NDAxYmEyLTIzYzYtNGVjYy04YmU2LWQ4YmVmMzM0OGUzNCIsImRhdGEiOnt9LCJyYW5kb20iOiIwMTJlYTcwY2Q1NDU5ZDhkM2Y5YjU0MjBlY2RmMDNmNSJ9.-J8j9pZ1K4Zm7Y1KoUBVMFmp6QsbE6k9s0Gffv_eSmLwrM2MvuPW9xbJL_d9mSd3zYM6ni13wAAPMQ3VXkCNFQ.
Thank you for your assistance. We believe this revision strengthens the manuscript by ensuring long-term accessibility of our materials.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-AC2 -
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking the links and DOIs that you provide for your repository, I have seen that the intended repository is not formally published. The full link that you provide (the three lines one) works, but points to a Zenodo site which does not even contain a version, as it is listed as unpublished. Therefore, you must solve this issue, and make the repository public before we can consider the issues I pointed out before solved.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-CEC3 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 25 Apr 2025
reply
Thank you for your patience and for checking our repository links. We have now formally published the Zenodo archive and confirm that it is live with a proper version and DOI. The updated repository details are:
- Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15244201
- Link to the Zenodo page: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15244202
The updated “Code and Data Availability” section in my previous comment reflects this DOI. Please let us know if there is anything further needed from us.
Thank you again for your guidance.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1112-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 25 Apr 2025
reply
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Apr 2025
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 24 Apr 2025
reply
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 19 Apr 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Arkaprabha Ganguli, 19 Apr 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
149 | 35 | 7 | 191 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 149
- PDF: 35
- XML: 7
- Total: 191
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1