Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-87
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-87
08 Feb 2024
 | 08 Feb 2024

Enabling In-Situ Magnetic Interference Mitigation Algorithm Validation via a Laboratory-Generated Dataset

Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles

Abstract. Magnetometer measurements are one of the critical components necessary to improve our understanding of the intricate physical processes coupling mass, momentum, and energy within near-Earth space and throughout our solar system. However, these measurements are often contaminated by stray magnetic fields from the spacecraft hosting the magnetic field sensors, and the data often requires the application of interference mitigation algorithms prior to scientific use. Rigorous numerical validation of these techniques can be challenging when they are applied to in-situ spaceflight data, as a ground truth for the local magnetic field is often unavailable. This manuscript introduces and details the generation of an open-source dataset designed to facilitate the assessment of interference mitigation techniques for magnetic field data collected during spaceflight missions. The dataset contains over 100 hours of magnetic field data comprising mixtures of near-DC trends, physically-synthesized interference, and pseudo-geophysical phenomena. These constituent source signals have been independently captured by four synchronized magnetometers sampling at high cadence and combined into 30-minute intervals of data representative of events and interference seen in historic missions. The physical location of the four magnetometers relative to the interference sources enables researchers to test their interference mitigation algorithms with various magnetometer suite configurations, and the dataset also provides a ground truth for the underlying interference signals, enabling rigorous quantification of the results of past, present, and future interference mitigation efforts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Aug 2024
Enabling in situ validation of mitigation algorithms for magnetic interference via a laboratory-generated dataset
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Mark Moldwin, 08 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Anonymous Referee #3, 04 Apr 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Matthew Finley, 01 May 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Mark Moldwin, 08 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Anonymous Referee #3, 04 Apr 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-87', Matthew Finley, 01 May 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Matthew Finley on behalf of the Authors (01 May 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (02 May 2024) by Lev Eppelbaum
AR by Matthew Finley on behalf of the Authors (16 May 2024)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Matthew Finley on behalf of the Authors (31 Jul 2024)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (15 Aug 2024) by Lev Eppelbaum

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Aug 2024
Enabling in situ validation of mitigation algorithms for magnetic interference via a laboratory-generated dataset
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles

Viewed

Total article views: 338 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
210 102 26 338 12 12
  • HTML: 210
  • PDF: 102
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 338
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 348 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 348 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 03 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Spaceflight magnetic field measurements are often contaminated by interference from the host spacecraft. We present a new dataset to enable development and testing of interference mitigation schemes for spaceflight magnetic fields data. Over 100 hours of data, including laboratory-generated proxies for magnetic interference and geophysical signals, has been produced. A ground truth for the underlying interference is also provided, enabling rigorous quantification of data cleaning techniques.