Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2555
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2555
18 Sep 2024
 | 18 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Field heterogeneity of soil texture controls leaf water potential spatial distribution in non-irrigated vineyards

Louis Delval, Jordan Bates, François Jonard, and Mathieu Javaux

Abstract. Grapevine water status exhibits substantial variability even within a single vineyard. Understanding how edaphic, topographic and climatic conditions impact grapevine water status heterogeneity at the field scale, in non-irrigated vineyards, is essential for winemakers as it significantly influences wine quality. This study aimed to quantify the spatial distribution of grapevine leaf water potential (Ψleaf) within vineyards and to assess the influence of soil properties heterogeneity, topography and weather on this intra-field variability, in two non-irrigated vineyards during two viticultural seasons. By combining multilinearly vegetation indices from very-high spatial resolution multispectral, thermal and LiDAR imageries collected with unmanned aerial systems, we efficiently and robustly captured the spatial distribution of Ψleaf across both vineyards, at different dates. Our results demonstrated that in non-irrigated vineyards, the spatial distribution of Ψleaf was mainly governed by the within-vineyard soil hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity (R² up to 0.81), and was particularly marked when the evaporative demand and the soil water deficit increased, since the range of Ψleaf was greater, up to 0.73 MPa, in these conditions. However, topographic attributes (elevation and slope) were less related to grapevine Ψleaf variability. These findings show that soil properties within-field spatial distribution and weather conditions are the primary factors governing Ψleaf heterogeneity observed in non-irrigated vineyards, and their effects are concomitants.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Louis Delval, Jordan Bates, François Jonard, and Mathieu Javaux

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Louis Delval, Jordan Bates, François Jonard, and Mathieu Javaux
Louis Delval, Jordan Bates, François Jonard, and Mathieu Javaux

Viewed

Total article views: 73 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
56 13 4 73 4 1 0
  • HTML: 56
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 73
  • Supplement: 4
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 66 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 66 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
The accurate quantification of grapevine water status is crucial for winemakers as it significantly impacts wine quality. It is acknowledged that within a single vineyard, the variability of grapevine water status can be significant. Within-field spatial distribution of soil hydraulic conductance and weather conditions are the primary factors governing the leaf water potential spatial heterogeneity and extent observed in non-irrigated vineyards, and their effects are concomitants.