the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An improved global pressure and ZWD model with optimized vertical correction considering the spatial-temporal variability of multiple height scale factors
Abstract. Atmospheric pressure and Zenith wet delay (ZWD) are essential for GNSS tropospheric correction and precipitable water vapor (PWV) retrieval. As the development progresses of real-time GNSS kinematic technology, moving platforms such as airborne and shipborne require high-quality tropospheric delay information to pre-correct errors. Most existing tropospheric models are only applicable to the Earth surface, while exhibiting poor accuracies in high-altitude areas due to simple vertical fitting functions and limited temporal resolution of the underlying parameters. Hence, an improved global empirical pressure and ZWD model is developed using 5-years ERA5 hourly reanalysis data, called IGPZWD, which takes seasonal and intraday variations into consideration. The vertical accuracy and applicability of IGPZWD model are further optimized by introducing the annual and semi-annual harmonics for pressure and ZWD height scale factors of exponential function with three orders. Taking the ERA5 and radiosonde profiles data in 2020 as reference, the pressure and ZWD of IGPZWD model show superior performance than those of three state-of-the-art models, i.e., GPT3, IGPT and GTrop. Furthermore, IGPZWD-predicted ZTD yields improvements of up to 65.7 %, 2.4 % and 7.8 % over that of GPT3, RGPT3 and GTrop models on a global scale respectively. The proposed vertical correction algorithm effectively weakens the impact of accumulation error caused by excessive height difference, achieving optimal accuracy and feasibility in the high-altitude area. The IGPZWD model can be extensively applied in GNSS kinematic precision positioning as well as atmospheric water vapor sounding.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(8133 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(8133 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jan 2024
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as it should be available before the Discussions stage. Also, please, include the relevant primary input/output data.In this way, if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. I should note that, actually, your manuscript should not have been accepted in Discussions, given this lack of compliance with our policy. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.
Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section, the DOI of the code (and another DOI for the dataset if necessary).
Additionally, the GitHub site for your code does not include a license. If you do not include a license, the code continues to be your property, and nobody can run or use it. Therefore, when uploading the model's code to the new repository, you could want to choose a free software/open-source (FLOSS) license. We recommend the GPLv3. You only need to include the file 'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt' as LICENSE.txt with your code. Also, you can choose other options that Zenodo provides: GPLv2, Apache License, MIT License, etc.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 27 Jan 2024
Thank you for your suggestion. We have uploaded the code for this article to Zenodo. The open-source codes and coefficient matrix files of the IGPZWD model are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10574193. If there are any errors, please notify us and we will make immediate modifications.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 02 Apr 2024
Dear EditorThank you very much for your gradual processing of our manuscript, and we also appreciate the comments from the referees. Both referees have made a decision on majorrepairs. To comprehensively improve the content and quality of this paper, we will conduct a large number of experiments and verifications. Due to the fact that we established a global model, and the workload and computation ofmodifications are enormous. Hence, we request an extra 20 days for modification, and we would like to extend the deadline to the 30 Apr 2024. If possible, we would be very grateful. We're looking forward to hearing from you.Gao XiangCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC2 -
AC5: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 18 May 2024
Dear editor, the reviewers have not uploaded their review comments. Could you provide a website or file for expert comments so that we can modify and improve the content of our paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC5
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 27 Jan 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2024
Review comments to the paper ”An improved global pressure and ZWD model with optimized vertical correction considering the spatial-temporal variability of multiple height scale factors”, manuscript ID egusphere-2023-2861.
General comments:
In the paper the authors describe a global data base of pressure and zenith wet delay (ZWD) to be used as a priori information in new estimates of ZWD. The authors show that the performance is better than the current existing models which means that this is an important and interesting contribution to the field. The paper however, is hard to read and figures are hard to follow. Major improvements are needed before the paper can be published.
First two minor comments:
1. In the introduction, please give some examples of applications of the this new model. It says that it can improve the positioning precision and enhance convergence speed, but of what and how much? Please mention some potential users of this model.
2. In several places acronyms appear without being defined. Please look through the manuscripts and change this.
Then to the main problems with this paper, which are the figures and the presentation of the results. The panels are too small and provide too much information for the reader to digest. There is no need to display five almost completely blue panels like in figure 4. Another example is that in figure 9 it is not possible to locate Greenland, Andes mountains or the Tibet Plateau which the authors refer to in the text. There are also both maps and bar charts in some of the figures where the bar charts are not explained. It would be beneficial to split these in to separate figures.
My advice is to describe the over all (global) picture in the text and then show figures with some examples where there are big differences or interesting results. For example in figures 8 an 9, it would be more interesting to see full profiles of selected locations than 4 levels globally. This means a complete make over of sections 3 and 4.
No specific or technical comments will be given here since the paper needs such substantial work. This can be given at later stages of the review process.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-RC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2861/egusphere-2023-2861-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2024
The authors describe a new model of pressure and zenith wet delay (ZWD) estimations focused on high-altitude areas. This work can be an interesting contribution to the field but the results are not properly represented and the validation is poorly explained. Please consider the following improvements:
* Many acronyms are not defined
* Introduction should include studies about ZTD and its derivates. There are good examples in South America and Europe.
* Figures do not represent the results. If the paper is focused on high-altitude zones, I recommend showing these areas in more detail.
* There are no descriptions of the data sets used for validation beyond their names.
* Considering radiosonde data: Have you removed outliers? Did you apply a filter to exclude sites with a low amount of registers?
* Furthermore, radiosondes in South America are few in comparison with North America and Europe, and many of them are located in low-altitude areas. Which criteria are used to describe the good fit of the model there?If this paper wants to focus on height altitude sites, I recommend to analyze these areas separately.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-RC2 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2861/egusphere-2023-2861-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jan 2024
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as it should be available before the Discussions stage. Also, please, include the relevant primary input/output data.In this way, if you do not fix this problem, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal. I should note that, actually, your manuscript should not have been accepted in Discussions, given this lack of compliance with our policy. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.
Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section, the DOI of the code (and another DOI for the dataset if necessary).
Additionally, the GitHub site for your code does not include a license. If you do not include a license, the code continues to be your property, and nobody can run or use it. Therefore, when uploading the model's code to the new repository, you could want to choose a free software/open-source (FLOSS) license. We recommend the GPLv3. You only need to include the file 'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt' as LICENSE.txt with your code. Also, you can choose other options that Zenodo provides: GPLv2, Apache License, MIT License, etc.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 27 Jan 2024
Thank you for your suggestion. We have uploaded the code for this article to Zenodo. The open-source codes and coefficient matrix files of the IGPZWD model are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10574193. If there are any errors, please notify us and we will make immediate modifications.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 02 Apr 2024
Dear EditorThank you very much for your gradual processing of our manuscript, and we also appreciate the comments from the referees. Both referees have made a decision on majorrepairs. To comprehensively improve the content and quality of this paper, we will conduct a large number of experiments and verifications. Due to the fact that we established a global model, and the workload and computation ofmodifications are enormous. Hence, we request an extra 20 days for modification, and we would like to extend the deadline to the 30 Apr 2024. If possible, we would be very grateful. We're looking forward to hearing from you.Gao XiangCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC2 -
AC5: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 18 May 2024
Dear editor, the reviewers have not uploaded their review comments. Could you provide a website or file for expert comments so that we can modify and improve the content of our paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-AC5
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Gao Xiang, 27 Jan 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2024
Review comments to the paper ”An improved global pressure and ZWD model with optimized vertical correction considering the spatial-temporal variability of multiple height scale factors”, manuscript ID egusphere-2023-2861.
General comments:
In the paper the authors describe a global data base of pressure and zenith wet delay (ZWD) to be used as a priori information in new estimates of ZWD. The authors show that the performance is better than the current existing models which means that this is an important and interesting contribution to the field. The paper however, is hard to read and figures are hard to follow. Major improvements are needed before the paper can be published.
First two minor comments:
1. In the introduction, please give some examples of applications of the this new model. It says that it can improve the positioning precision and enhance convergence speed, but of what and how much? Please mention some potential users of this model.
2. In several places acronyms appear without being defined. Please look through the manuscripts and change this.
Then to the main problems with this paper, which are the figures and the presentation of the results. The panels are too small and provide too much information for the reader to digest. There is no need to display five almost completely blue panels like in figure 4. Another example is that in figure 9 it is not possible to locate Greenland, Andes mountains or the Tibet Plateau which the authors refer to in the text. There are also both maps and bar charts in some of the figures where the bar charts are not explained. It would be beneficial to split these in to separate figures.
My advice is to describe the over all (global) picture in the text and then show figures with some examples where there are big differences or interesting results. For example in figures 8 an 9, it would be more interesting to see full profiles of selected locations than 4 levels globally. This means a complete make over of sections 3 and 4.
No specific or technical comments will be given here since the paper needs such substantial work. This can be given at later stages of the review process.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-RC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2861/egusphere-2023-2861-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2861', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2024
The authors describe a new model of pressure and zenith wet delay (ZWD) estimations focused on high-altitude areas. This work can be an interesting contribution to the field but the results are not properly represented and the validation is poorly explained. Please consider the following improvements:
* Many acronyms are not defined
* Introduction should include studies about ZTD and its derivates. There are good examples in South America and Europe.
* Figures do not represent the results. If the paper is focused on high-altitude zones, I recommend showing these areas in more detail.
* There are no descriptions of the data sets used for validation beyond their names.
* Considering radiosonde data: Have you removed outliers? Did you apply a filter to exclude sites with a low amount of registers?
* Furthermore, radiosondes in South America are few in comparison with North America and Europe, and many of them are located in low-altitude areas. Which criteria are used to describe the good fit of the model there?If this paper wants to focus on height altitude sites, I recommend to analyze these areas separately.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2861-RC2 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2861/egusphere-2023-2861-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Gao Xiang, 19 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
451 | 102 | 40 | 593 | 16 | 18 |
- HTML: 451
- PDF: 102
- XML: 40
- Total: 593
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Chunhua Jiang
Xiang Gao
Huizhong Zhu
Shuaimin Wang
Sixuan Liu
Shaoni Chen
Guangsheng Liu
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(8133 KB) - Metadata XML