the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A high-resolution Global Aviation emissions Inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA) for 2019–2021
Abstract. Aviation emissions that are dispersed into the Earth's atmosphere affect the climate and air pollution, with significant spatiotemporal variation owing to heterogeneous aircraft activity. In this paper, we use historical flight trajectories derived from Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) telemetry and reanalysis weather data for 2019–2021 to develop the Global Aviation emissions inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA). In 2019, 40.2 million flights collectively travelled 61 billion kilometres using 283 Tg of fuel, leading to CO2, NOX, non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) mass and number emissions of 893 Tg, 4.49 Tg, 21.4 Gg, and 2.8×1026, respectively. Global responses to COVID-19 led to reductions in the annual flight distance flown, CO2, and NOX emissions in 2020 (-43 %, -48 % and -50 %, respectively relative to 2019) and 2021 (-31 %, -41 % and -43 %, respectively) with significant regional variability. Short-haul flights with duration < 3 h accounted for 83 % of all flights, yet only for 35 % of the 2019 CO2 emissions, while long-haul flights with duration > 6 h (5 % of all flights) were responsible for t43 % of CO2 and 49 % of NOX emissions. Globally, actual flight trajectories flown are, on average, ~5 % greater than the great-circle path between the origin-destination airport but this varies by region and flight distance. An evaluation of 8,705 unique flights between London and Singapore showed large variabilities in the flight trajectory profile, fuel consumption and emission indices. GAIA captures the spatiotemporal distribution of aviation activity and emissions and is provided for use in future studies to evaluate the negative externalities arising from global aviation.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1966 KB)
-
Supplement
(5509 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1966 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(5509 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-724', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Jun 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1 and RC2', Marc Stettler, 11 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-724', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Jun 2023
Review of "A high-resolution Global Aviation emissions Inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA) for 2019–2021" by Teoh et al.
This manuscript presents a new aviation emissions data based on individual flight level data and models of engine performance. Most of the technical details are in the supplement, and summary analysis is presented in the main manuscript.
The manuscript is a good description and analysis of an important new dataset for aviation emissions covering the period 2019-2021, pre, beginning and mid pandemic. The analysis in the manuscript is well presented. It should be publishable with minor revisions. I think some of the analysis could be presented a little better with some more figures (in addition to tables) as noted below. The supplement seems correct and comprehensive. The data (low time resolution) has been posted to an available archive.
Specific comments:
Page 2, L31: where does the 1034 Tg number come from (reference?)Page 5, L140: How does the -8% lower comparison at major airports mesh with +15% to +20% globally?
Page 5, L150: can you say what the default is and what the modifications are briefly?
Page 11, L255: see note on table 4. I suggest making a histogram that makes clear the differences between consumption and distance (and emissions) by region…
Page 11, L252: for fleet compostition, higher fuel use rate per km is due to more narrow body aircraft?
Page 11, L285: maybe figure 2c could be in percent?
Page 13, L290: suggest that the percent values of distance, fuel and emissions by region be made into a histogram (grouped by region) to make deviations from say % distance travelled evident.
Page 15, L308: I though short haul were less efficient (kg/km) per unit distance? (E.g. discussing China above) Or is that not the case? Please clarify.
Page 20, L409: You have Fuel consumption per passenger-km: is that the same as gross fuel consumption? Presumably the rerouting is to save fuel, so the variance in fuel used should be smaller than distance? Would be interesting maybe to state total fuel per flight on this route and how much it varies (more or less than distance).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-724-RC2
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-724', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Jun 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1 and RC2', Marc Stettler, 11 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-724', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Jun 2023
Review of "A high-resolution Global Aviation emissions Inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA) for 2019–2021" by Teoh et al.
This manuscript presents a new aviation emissions data based on individual flight level data and models of engine performance. Most of the technical details are in the supplement, and summary analysis is presented in the main manuscript.
The manuscript is a good description and analysis of an important new dataset for aviation emissions covering the period 2019-2021, pre, beginning and mid pandemic. The analysis in the manuscript is well presented. It should be publishable with minor revisions. I think some of the analysis could be presented a little better with some more figures (in addition to tables) as noted below. The supplement seems correct and comprehensive. The data (low time resolution) has been posted to an available archive.
Specific comments:
Page 2, L31: where does the 1034 Tg number come from (reference?)Page 5, L140: How does the -8% lower comparison at major airports mesh with +15% to +20% globally?
Page 5, L150: can you say what the default is and what the modifications are briefly?
Page 11, L255: see note on table 4. I suggest making a histogram that makes clear the differences between consumption and distance (and emissions) by region…
Page 11, L252: for fleet compostition, higher fuel use rate per km is due to more narrow body aircraft?
Page 11, L285: maybe figure 2c could be in percent?
Page 13, L290: suggest that the percent values of distance, fuel and emissions by region be made into a histogram (grouped by region) to make deviations from say % distance travelled evident.
Page 15, L308: I though short haul were less efficient (kg/km) per unit distance? (E.g. discussing China above) Or is that not the case? Please clarify.
Page 20, L409: You have Fuel consumption per passenger-km: is that the same as gross fuel consumption? Presumably the rerouting is to save fuel, so the variance in fuel used should be smaller than distance? Would be interesting maybe to state total fuel per flight on this route and how much it varies (more or less than distance).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-724-RC2
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
880 | 543 | 47 | 1,470 | 122 | 24 | 23 |
- HTML: 880
- PDF: 543
- XML: 47
- Total: 1,470
- Supplement: 122
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The high-resolution Global Aviation emissions Inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA) for 2019–2021 R. Teoh et al. 10.5194/acp-24-725-2024
- Global aviation contrail climate effects from 2019 to 2021 R. Teoh et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024
- Domestic and international aviation emission inventories for the UNFCCC parties J. Klenner et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3a7d
Roger Teoh
Zebediah Engberg
Marc Shapiro
Lynnette Dray
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1966 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(5509 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper