GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: high-efficient parallel GPU design of the Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for horizontal advection in air quality model (CAMx V6.10)

Cao, Kai; Wu, Qizhong; Wang, Lingling; Wang, Nan; Cheng, Huaqiong; Tang, Xiao; Li, Dongqing; Wang, Lanning

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410

Preprints

https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410

Preprints

04 Apr 2023

| 04 Apr 2023

GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: high-efficient parallel GPU design of the Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for horizontal advection in air quality model (CAMx V6.10)

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Abstract. With semiconductor technology gradually approaching its physical and thermal limits, Graphics processing unit (GPU) is becoming an attractive solution in many scientific applications due to their high performance. This paper presents an application of GPU accelerators in air quality model. We endeavor to demonstrate an approach that runs a PPM solver of horizontal advection (HADVPPM) for air quality model CAMx on GPU clusters. Specifically, we first convert the HADVPPM to a new Compute Unified Device Architecture C (CUDA C) code to make it computable on the GPU (GPU-HADVPPM). Then, a series of optimization measures are taken, including reducing the CPU-GPU communication frequency, increasing the size of data computation on GPU, optimizing the GPU memory access, and using thread and block indices in order to improve the overall computing performance of CAMx model coupled with GPU-HADVPPM (named as CAMx-CUDA model). Finally, a heterogeneous, hybrid programming paradigm is presented and utilized with the GPU-HADVPPM on GPU clusters with Massage Passing Interface (MPI) and CUDA. Offline experiment results show that running GPU-HADVPPM on one NVIDIA Tesla K40m and NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU can achieve up to 845.4x and 1113.6x acceleration. By implementing a series of optimization schemes, the CAMx-CUDA model resulted in a 29.0x and 128.4x improvement in computational efficiency using a GPU accelerator card on a K40m and V100 cluster, respectively. In terms of the single-module computational efficiency of GPU-HADVPPM, it can achieve 1.3x and 19.4x speedup on NVIDIA Tesla K40m GPU and NVIDA Tesla V100 GPU respectively. The multi-GPU acceleration algorithm enables 4.5x speedup with 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU accelerators on V100 cluster.

Received: 06 Mar 2023 – Discussion started: 04 Apr 2023

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Download & links

Preprint (PDF, 6910 KB)

Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
Preprint (6910 KB)

Supplement (1555 KB)

Download & links

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

01 Aug 2023

GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: a high-efficiency parallel GPU design of the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for horizontal advection in an air quality model (CAMx V6.10)

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4367–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023, 2023

Short summary

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Apr 2023
This paper presents implementation and opitimization of air quality model CAMx using Cuda C targeting GPU clusters. Experiment results show that GPU- HADVPPM can achieve about 1000x acceleration, the series of optimization can acheive about dozens of times acceleration and the final version of CAMx-GPU can achieve 4.5x speedup with 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU accelerators on V100 cluster. Here are some specific comments.
This paper need to be more convincing about how someexperiment results will be explained. Such as: the offline experiment achieves about 1000x acceleration which is far exceed the ratio of theoretical peak performance of GPU and CPU.

It is suggested to supplement performance data of CAMximplemented by Fortran and C in section4.4.1.

There are some typing errors, such as CAS-EMSshould be CAS-ESM , CAMx-V1.0 in line 492 should be CAMx-CUDAV1.0.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC1
CC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Kai Cao, 20 Apr 2023
This paper presents implementation and optimization of air quality model CAMx using Cuda C targeting GPU clusters. Experiment results show that GPU-HADVPPM can achieve about 1000x acceleration, the series of optimization can acheive about dozens of times acceleration and the final version of CAMx-GPU can achieve 4.5x speedup with 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU accelerators on V100 cluster. Here are some specific comments.

Response: We appreciate the editor for reviewing our manuscript and for the valuable suggestions,
which we will address point by point in the following.

This paper need to be more convincing about how some experiment results will be explained. Such as: the offline experiment achieves about 1000x acceleration which is far exceed the ratio of theoretical peak performance of GPU and CPU.

Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. In the thread hierarchy, the thread is the most basic unit of GPU for parallel computing. Threads can be organized into one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional blocks. In a three-dimensional block, each dimension can contain a maximum number of threads of 1024, 1024, and 64, respectively. Similarly, blocks can be organized into one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional grids. In a three-dimensional grid, each dimension can contain a maximum number of blocks of 2³¹-1, 65535, and 65535, respectively. It is theoretically possible to distribute a large number of copies of kernel functions into tens of billions of threads for parallel computing without exceeding the GPU memory. In the offline performance test, we adopted a one-dimensional thread organization, with 1024 threads per block and several blocks based on the array size. For example, in the data size of , the GPU can implement the parallel computation of 10 million threads, while the CPU can only use serial cyclic computation. Therefore, the offline experiments achieve up to 1100x acceleration, and the larger the data size, the more pronounced the advantage of GPU multithreading architecture and the higher the computing efficiency. In addition, the data transfer time between CPU and GPU is not considered in the offline performance experiments. Also, without I/O, the GPU-based SBU-YLIN scheme in the WRF model can achieve 896x speedup compared to a Fortran implementation running on a CPU (Mielikainen et al.,2012). We have revised this part in lines 463-474, which are as follows:
As described in Sect. 3.2, the thread is the most basic unit of GPU for parallel computing. Each dimension of the three-dimensional block can contain a maximum number of threads of 1024,1024, and 64, respectively. Each dimension of the three-dimensional grid can contain a maximum number of blocks of , 65535, and 65535. It is theoretically possible to distribute a large number of copies of kernel functions into tens of billions of threads for parallel computing without exceeding the GPU memory. In the offline performance experiments, the GPU achieved up to 10 million threads of parallel computing, while the CPU can only use serial cyclic computation. Therefore, GPU-HADVPPM achieves a maximum acceleration of about 1100x without I/O. In addition to this study, the GPU-based SBU-YLIN scheme in the WRF model can achieve 896x acceleration compared to the Fortran implementation running on the CPU (Mielikainen et al., 2012b).

It is suggested to supplement performance data of CAMx implemented by Fortran and C in section4.4.1.

Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. We supplement the coupling performance experiment results for the C version of HADVPPM. On the K40m and V100 cluster, the elapsed time of the C version HADVPPM is 51.4 seconds and 45.2 seconds, respectively, 26.7% and 33.4% lower than that of the Fortran version HADVPPM. We have revised this part in lines 519-534, which are as follows:
In terms of the single module computational efficiency of HADVPPM and GPU-HADVPPM, we further coupling test the computational performance of the Fortran version HADVPPM on the CPU, C version HADVPPM on the CPU, and CUDA C version GPU-HADVPPM in CAMx-CUDA V1.4 (GPU-HADVPPM V1.4) on the GPU, using system_clock functions in the Fortran language and cudaEvent_t in CUDA programming. The specific results are shown in Figure 11. On the K40m cluster, it takes 37.7 seconds and 51.4 seconds to launch the Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4 CPU to run Fortran and C version HADVPPM, the C version is 26.7% slower than the Fortran version. After the CUDA technology was used to convert the C code into CUDA C, the CUDA C version took 29.6 seconds to launch an NVIDIA Telsa K40m GPU to run GPU-HADVPPM V1.4, with 1.3x and 1.7x acceleration. On the V100 cluster, the Fortran, the C, and the CUDA C version are computationally more efficient than those on the K40m cluster. It takes 30.1 seconds and 45.2 seconds to launch Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 CPU to run Fortran and C version HADVPPM and 1.6 seconds to run the GPU-HADVPPM V1.4 using an NVIDIA V100 GPU. The computational efficiency of the CUDA C version is 18.8x and 28.3x higher than Fortran and C versions.

Figure 11. The elapsed time of the Fortran version HADVPPM on the CPU, the C version HADVPPM on the CPU, and CUDA C version GPU-HADVPPM V1.4 on the GPU. The unit is seconds (s).

There are some typing errors, such as CAS-EMS should be CAS-ESM, CAMx-V1.0 in line 492 should be CAMx-CUDA V1.0.

Response: Sorry for this mistake. We have corrected typing errors in line 64, 84, and 504, which are as follows:
Line 64: The GPU has proven successful in weather models such as Non-Hydrostatic Icosahedral Model (NIM; Govett et al.,2017), Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System (GRAPES; Xiao et al., 2022), and Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF; Huang et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012; Mielikainen et al., 2012a; Mielikainen et al., 2012b; Mielikainen et al., 2013a ; Mielikainen et al., 2013b; Price et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2015), ocean models such as LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model (LICOM; Jiang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021a) and Princeton Ocean Model (POM; Xu et al., 2015), and the Earth System Model of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-ESM; Wang et al., 2021b ; Wang et al., 2021c).

Line 84: In terms of climate system model, Wang et al., (2021c) and Wang et al., (2021b) used CUDA Fortran and CUDA C to carry out heterogeneous porting of the RRTMG_SW and RRTMG_LW scheme of the atmospheric component model of the CAS-ESM earth system model, and achieved a 38.88x and 77.78x acceleration respectively.

Line 504: In CAMx-CUDA V1.2, the frequency of data transmission between CPU-GPU within one time step is reduced to 1, and the elapsed time on the two heterogeneous clusters is 1207 seconds and 548 seconds, respectively, and the speedup is 9.0x and 68.0x compared to the CAMx-CUDA V1.0.

Reference
Mielikainen, J., Huang, B., Huang, H.-L. A., and Goldberg, M. D.: GPU Implementation of Stony Brook University 5-Class Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the WRF, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5, 625-633, 10.1109/jstars.2011.2175707, 2012.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-CC1
- RC3: 'Reply on CC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2023
  
  The revision has solved every issues I am concerned
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC3
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 May 2023
GPU accelerators have great potential to improve the efficiency of air quality modeling. The authors have explained the steps taken to convert a PPM solver of horizontal advection for air quality model CAMx into a new Compute Unified Device Architecture C (CUDA C) code and how this optimization approach has resulted in significant improvement in computational efficiency. This paper presents a promising approach for using GPU accelerators in air quality modeling and provides valuable insights into the optimization measures that can be taken to improve the overall computing performance of model. The authors' findings can potentially benefit researchers in air quality modeling and related fields. My comments listed below.

Comments:
The manuscript should be written more concisely, removing unnecessary material. For example, the information presented in Table 1 partly duplicates that presented in Figure 1b. Figure 9 doesn’t provide too much important information and can be moved to Supplementary.

The authors select the hadvppm program to implement the heterogeneous porting. It could benefit from providing some additional context about the motivation for selecting hadvppm program.

In Figure 5-7, large absolute errors mainly occur over Zhangjiakou City for SO₂, NO₂ CO and PSO₄ while simulated O₃ and H₂O₂ show large errors over Baoding city. Please explain how do porting process cause such patterns.

I'd suggest the authors discussing in the Conclusions and Discussion section any limitations of the current approach, which may warrant future refinement.

Line 173-177, 337-342: Please unify the tense of the sentence.

Line 354: Please clarify “30-min spatial resolution”.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC2
- CC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kai Cao, 19 May 2023
  
  GPU accelerators have great potential to improve the efficiency of air quality modeling. The authors have explained the steps taken to convert a PPM solver of horizontal advection for air quality model CAMx into a new Compute Unified Device Architecture C (CUDA C) code and how this optimization approach has resulted in significant improvement in computational efficiency. This paper presents a promising approach for using GPU accelerators in air quality modeling and provides valuable insights into the optimization measures that can be taken to improve the overall computing performance of model. The authors' findings can potentially benefit researchers in air quality modeling and related fields. My comments listed below.
  Response: We appreciate the editor for reviewing our manuscript and for the valuable suggestions, which we will address point by point in the following.
  1. The manuscript should be written more concisely, removing unnecessary material. For example, the information presented in Table 1 partly duplicates that presented in Figure 1b. Figure 9 doesn’t provide too much important information and can be moved to Supplementary.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. We have removed Table 1, and placed Figure 9 in the supplementary. The relevant expressions and contents in the paper have also been modified in lines 156-162 and 417-421, which are as follows:
  Lines 156-162: The VTune tool detects each module's runtime and the most time-consuming functions on P1. As shown in Figure 1b, the top four time-consuming modules are chemistry, diffusion, horizontal advection, and vertical advection in the CAMx model. In the above four modules, the top five most time-consuming programs are ebirate, hadvppm, tridiag, diffus, and ebisolv programs, and the total runtime of P1 is 325.1 seconds. Top1 and Top2's most time-consuming programs take 49.4 and 35.6 seconds, respectively.
  Lines 417-421: In terms of time series, the regionally averaged time series of the three versions are almost consistent (as is shown in Figure S2), and the maximum AEs for the above six species are 0.001ppbV, 0.005 ppbV, 0.002 ppbV, 0.03ppbV, 0.0001 ppbV and 0.0002 ug/m^3 , respectively, between the Fortran and CUDA C versions.
  2. The authors select the hadvppm program to implement the heterogeneous porting. It could benefit from providing some additional context about the motivation for selecting hadvppm program.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. There are some reasons for selecting hadvppm for heterogeneous porting. Firstly, the advection module is one of the compulsory modules of the air quality model, which is mainly used to simulate the transport process of air pollutants, and it is also a hotspot module detected by the Intel VTune tool. Then, typical air quality models CAMx, CMAQ, and NAQPMS include advection modules and use the exact PPM advection solver. The heterogeneous version developed in this study can be directly applied to the above models. Furthermore, the weather model (e.g., WRF) also contains an advection module, so this study's heterogeneous porting method and experience can be used for reference. We have revised this part in lines 163-173, which are as follows:
  By consideration, the hadvppm program was selected to carry out heterogeneous porting for some reasons. Firstly, the advection module is one of the compulsory modules of the air quality model, which is mainly used to simulate the transport process of air pollutants, and it is also a hotspot module detected by the Intel VTune tool. Then, typical air quality models CAMx, CMAQ, and NAQPMS include advection modules and use the exact PPM advection solver. The heterogeneous version developed in this study can be directly applied to the above models. Furthermore, the weather model (e.g., WRF) also contains an advection module, so this study's heterogeneous porting method and experience can be used for reference. Therefore, a GPU acceleration version of the HADVPPM scheme, namely GPU-HADVPPM, is built to improve CAMx performance.
  3. In Figure 5-7, large absolute errors mainly occur over Zhangjiakou City for SO₂, NO₂CO and PSO₄ while simulated O₃ and H₂O₂ show large errors over Baoding city. Please explain how do porting process cause such patterns.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. During the process of heterogeneous porting, the CUDA technology was used to convert the standard C code into CUDA C to make the hadvppm program computable on the GPU. However, due to the slight difference in data operation and accuracy between CPU and GPU(NVIDIA,2023), the concentration variable of hadvppm program appears to have minimal negative values (about -10^-4~-10^-9) when integrating on GPU. In order to allow the program to continue running, we forcibly replace these negative values with 10^-9. It is because these negative values are replaced by positive values that the simulation results are biased. Furthermore, we adopted the evaluation method of Wang et al. (2021) to compute the ratio between the root-mean-square-error and standard deviation of six species, such as SO₂, O₃, NO₂, CO, H₂O₂, and PSO₄. The results were 0.004%, 0.003%, 0.003%, 0.006%, 0.015%, and 0.004%, respectively, which were far less than the 0.2% mentioned by Wang et al. (2021), so the absolute errors of simulation results in this study are within the acceptable range. We have revised this part in lines 375-383, which are as follows:
  During the porting process, the primary error came from converting standard C to CUDA C, and the main reason was the hardware difference between the CPU and GPU. Due to the slight difference in data operation and accuracy between CPU and GPU(NVIDIA,2023), the concentration variable of hadvppm program appears to have minimal negative values (about -10^-4~-10^-9) when integrating on GPU. In order to allow the program to continue running, we forcibly replace these negative values with 10^-9. It is because these negative values are replaced by positive values that the simulation results are biased.
  4. I'd suggest the authors discussing in the Conclusions and Discussion section any limitations of the current approach, which may warrant future refinement.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. There are some limitations of the current approach.
  (1) We currently implemented thread and block co-indexing to compute horizontal grid points in parallel. Given the CAMx model 3-dimensional grid computing characteristics, 3-dimensional thread and block co-indexing will be considered to compute 3-dimensional grid points in parallel.
  (2) The communication bandwidth of data transfer is one of the main issues for restricting the computing performance of CUDA C codes on GPUs. In this study, data transmission efficiency between CPU and GPU is improved only by reducing communication frequency. In the future, more technologies, such as pinned memory (Wang et al.,2016), will be considered to solve the communication bottleneck between CPU and GPU.
  (3) In order to further improve the overall computational efficiency of the CAMx model, the heterogeneous porting scheme proposed in this study will be considered to carry out the heterogeneous porting of other CAMx modules in the future.
  We have added this part in lines 600-614, which are as follows:
  However, there are some limitations of the current approach which are as follows:
  (1) We currently implemented thread and block co-indexing to compute horizontal grid points in parallel. Given the CAMx model 3-dimensional grid computing characteristics, 3-dimensional thread and block co-indexing will be considered to compute 3-dimensional grid points in parallel.
  (2) The communication bandwidth of data transfer is one of the main issues for restricting the computing performance of CUDA C codes on GPUs. This restriction not only holds true for GPU-HADVPPM, but also WRF module as well (Mielikainen et al., 2012b; Mielikainen et al., 2013b; Huang et al., 2013). In this study, data transmission efficiency between CPU and GPU is improved only by reducing communication frequency. In the future, more technologies, such as pinned memory (Wang et al.,2016), will be considered to solve the communication bottleneck between CPU and GPU.
  (3) In order to further improve the overall computational efficiency of the CAMx model, the heterogeneous porting scheme proposed in this study will be considered to carry out the heterogeneous porting of other CAMx modules in the future.
  5. Line 173-177, 337-342: Please unify the tense of the sentence.
  Response: Sorry for these mistakes. We have revised this part in lines 180-187 and 342-349, which are as follows:
  Lines 180-187: The heterogeneous scheme of CAMx-CUDA is shown in Figure 2. The second time-consuming hadvppm program in the CAMx model was selected to implement the heterogeneous porting. In order to map the hadvppm program to the GPU, the Fortran code was converted to standard C code. Then, CUDA programing language, which was tailor-made for NVIDIA, was added to convert the standard C code into CUDA C for data-parallel execution on GPU, as GPU-HADVPPM. It prepared the input data for GPU-HADVPPM by constructing random numbers and tested its offline performance on the GPU platform.
  Lines 342-349: The validation and evaluation of porting the HADVPPM scheme from the CPU to the GPU platform were conducted using offline and coupling performance experiments. First, we validated the result between different CAMx versions, and then the offline performance of the GPU-HADVPPM on a single GPU was tested by offline experiment. Finally, the coupling performance experiments illustrate its potential in three dimensions with varying chemical regimes. Sect.4.2 and Sect.4.4, the CAMx version of the HADVPPM scheme written by Fortran language, standard C, and CUDA C, is named F, C, and CUDA C, respectively.
  6. Line 354: Please clarify “30-min spatial resolution”.
  Response: Sorry for the confusion. Minute is the angular resolution. According to the conversion formula, 30-min is 0.5 degrees, and the corresponding range resolution is about 55.6 kilometers at mid-latitude. We have revised this part in line 361, which are as follows:
  30-min (about 55.6km at mid-latitude) spatial resolution
  
  Reference
  NVIDIA: Floating Point and IEEE 754 Compliance for NVIDIA GPUs. Release 12.1, available at: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/floating-point/#differences-from-x86 (last access: 18 May 2023), 2023.
  Wang, P., Jiang, J., Lin, P., Ding, M., Wei, J., Zhang, F., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Yu, Z., Zheng, W., Yu, Y., Chi, X., and Liu, H.: The GPU version of LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model version 3 (LICOM3) under the heterogeneous-compute interface for portability (HIP) framework and its large-scale application, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2781-2799, 10.5194/gmd-14-2781-2021, 2021.
  Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Li, F., Zhou, C., Hu, H., and Jiang, J.: GPU-RRTMG_SW: Accelerating a Shortwave Radiative Transfer Scheme on GPU, IEEE Access, 9, 84231-84240, 10.1109/access.2021.3087507, 2016.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-CC2
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Qizhong Wu, 01 Jun 2023

We are thankful to the two reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments that help us improve the manuscript substantially. We have revised the manuscript accordingly. The point-to-point response to each comment is liast in the supplement, and the revised manuscript will be upload as soon as possible.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-AC1

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Apr 2023
This paper presents implementation and opitimization of air quality model CAMx using Cuda C targeting GPU clusters. Experiment results show that GPU- HADVPPM can achieve about 1000x acceleration, the series of optimization can acheive about dozens of times acceleration and the final version of CAMx-GPU can achieve 4.5x speedup with 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU accelerators on V100 cluster. Here are some specific comments.
This paper need to be more convincing about how someexperiment results will be explained. Such as: the offline experiment achieves about 1000x acceleration which is far exceed the ratio of theoretical peak performance of GPU and CPU.

It is suggested to supplement performance data of CAMximplemented by Fortran and C in section4.4.1.

There are some typing errors, such as CAS-EMSshould be CAS-ESM , CAMx-V1.0 in line 492 should be CAMx-CUDAV1.0.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC1
CC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Kai Cao, 20 Apr 2023
This paper presents implementation and optimization of air quality model CAMx using Cuda C targeting GPU clusters. Experiment results show that GPU-HADVPPM can achieve about 1000x acceleration, the series of optimization can acheive about dozens of times acceleration and the final version of CAMx-GPU can achieve 4.5x speedup with 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU accelerators on V100 cluster. Here are some specific comments.

Response: We appreciate the editor for reviewing our manuscript and for the valuable suggestions,
which we will address point by point in the following.

This paper need to be more convincing about how some experiment results will be explained. Such as: the offline experiment achieves about 1000x acceleration which is far exceed the ratio of theoretical peak performance of GPU and CPU.

Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. In the thread hierarchy, the thread is the most basic unit of GPU for parallel computing. Threads can be organized into one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional blocks. In a three-dimensional block, each dimension can contain a maximum number of threads of 1024, 1024, and 64, respectively. Similarly, blocks can be organized into one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional grids. In a three-dimensional grid, each dimension can contain a maximum number of blocks of 2³¹-1, 65535, and 65535, respectively. It is theoretically possible to distribute a large number of copies of kernel functions into tens of billions of threads for parallel computing without exceeding the GPU memory. In the offline performance test, we adopted a one-dimensional thread organization, with 1024 threads per block and several blocks based on the array size. For example, in the data size of , the GPU can implement the parallel computation of 10 million threads, while the CPU can only use serial cyclic computation. Therefore, the offline experiments achieve up to 1100x acceleration, and the larger the data size, the more pronounced the advantage of GPU multithreading architecture and the higher the computing efficiency. In addition, the data transfer time between CPU and GPU is not considered in the offline performance experiments. Also, without I/O, the GPU-based SBU-YLIN scheme in the WRF model can achieve 896x speedup compared to a Fortran implementation running on a CPU (Mielikainen et al.,2012). We have revised this part in lines 463-474, which are as follows:
As described in Sect. 3.2, the thread is the most basic unit of GPU for parallel computing. Each dimension of the three-dimensional block can contain a maximum number of threads of 1024,1024, and 64, respectively. Each dimension of the three-dimensional grid can contain a maximum number of blocks of , 65535, and 65535. It is theoretically possible to distribute a large number of copies of kernel functions into tens of billions of threads for parallel computing without exceeding the GPU memory. In the offline performance experiments, the GPU achieved up to 10 million threads of parallel computing, while the CPU can only use serial cyclic computation. Therefore, GPU-HADVPPM achieves a maximum acceleration of about 1100x without I/O. In addition to this study, the GPU-based SBU-YLIN scheme in the WRF model can achieve 896x acceleration compared to the Fortran implementation running on the CPU (Mielikainen et al., 2012b).

It is suggested to supplement performance data of CAMx implemented by Fortran and C in section4.4.1.

Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. We supplement the coupling performance experiment results for the C version of HADVPPM. On the K40m and V100 cluster, the elapsed time of the C version HADVPPM is 51.4 seconds and 45.2 seconds, respectively, 26.7% and 33.4% lower than that of the Fortran version HADVPPM. We have revised this part in lines 519-534, which are as follows:
In terms of the single module computational efficiency of HADVPPM and GPU-HADVPPM, we further coupling test the computational performance of the Fortran version HADVPPM on the CPU, C version HADVPPM on the CPU, and CUDA C version GPU-HADVPPM in CAMx-CUDA V1.4 (GPU-HADVPPM V1.4) on the GPU, using system_clock functions in the Fortran language and cudaEvent_t in CUDA programming. The specific results are shown in Figure 11. On the K40m cluster, it takes 37.7 seconds and 51.4 seconds to launch the Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4 CPU to run Fortran and C version HADVPPM, the C version is 26.7% slower than the Fortran version. After the CUDA technology was used to convert the C code into CUDA C, the CUDA C version took 29.6 seconds to launch an NVIDIA Telsa K40m GPU to run GPU-HADVPPM V1.4, with 1.3x and 1.7x acceleration. On the V100 cluster, the Fortran, the C, and the CUDA C version are computationally more efficient than those on the K40m cluster. It takes 30.1 seconds and 45.2 seconds to launch Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 CPU to run Fortran and C version HADVPPM and 1.6 seconds to run the GPU-HADVPPM V1.4 using an NVIDIA V100 GPU. The computational efficiency of the CUDA C version is 18.8x and 28.3x higher than Fortran and C versions.

Figure 11. The elapsed time of the Fortran version HADVPPM on the CPU, the C version HADVPPM on the CPU, and CUDA C version GPU-HADVPPM V1.4 on the GPU. The unit is seconds (s).

There are some typing errors, such as CAS-EMS should be CAS-ESM, CAMx-V1.0 in line 492 should be CAMx-CUDA V1.0.

Response: Sorry for this mistake. We have corrected typing errors in line 64, 84, and 504, which are as follows:
Line 64: The GPU has proven successful in weather models such as Non-Hydrostatic Icosahedral Model (NIM; Govett et al.,2017), Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System (GRAPES; Xiao et al., 2022), and Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF; Huang et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012; Mielikainen et al., 2012a; Mielikainen et al., 2012b; Mielikainen et al., 2013a ; Mielikainen et al., 2013b; Price et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2015), ocean models such as LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model (LICOM; Jiang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021a) and Princeton Ocean Model (POM; Xu et al., 2015), and the Earth System Model of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-ESM; Wang et al., 2021b ; Wang et al., 2021c).

Line 84: In terms of climate system model, Wang et al., (2021c) and Wang et al., (2021b) used CUDA Fortran and CUDA C to carry out heterogeneous porting of the RRTMG_SW and RRTMG_LW scheme of the atmospheric component model of the CAS-ESM earth system model, and achieved a 38.88x and 77.78x acceleration respectively.

Line 504: In CAMx-CUDA V1.2, the frequency of data transmission between CPU-GPU within one time step is reduced to 1, and the elapsed time on the two heterogeneous clusters is 1207 seconds and 548 seconds, respectively, and the speedup is 9.0x and 68.0x compared to the CAMx-CUDA V1.0.

Reference
Mielikainen, J., Huang, B., Huang, H.-L. A., and Goldberg, M. D.: GPU Implementation of Stony Brook University 5-Class Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the WRF, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5, 625-633, 10.1109/jstars.2011.2175707, 2012.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-CC1
- RC3: 'Reply on CC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2023
  
  The revision has solved every issues I am concerned
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC3
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 May 2023
GPU accelerators have great potential to improve the efficiency of air quality modeling. The authors have explained the steps taken to convert a PPM solver of horizontal advection for air quality model CAMx into a new Compute Unified Device Architecture C (CUDA C) code and how this optimization approach has resulted in significant improvement in computational efficiency. This paper presents a promising approach for using GPU accelerators in air quality modeling and provides valuable insights into the optimization measures that can be taken to improve the overall computing performance of model. The authors' findings can potentially benefit researchers in air quality modeling and related fields. My comments listed below.

Comments:
The manuscript should be written more concisely, removing unnecessary material. For example, the information presented in Table 1 partly duplicates that presented in Figure 1b. Figure 9 doesn’t provide too much important information and can be moved to Supplementary.

The authors select the hadvppm program to implement the heterogeneous porting. It could benefit from providing some additional context about the motivation for selecting hadvppm program.

In Figure 5-7, large absolute errors mainly occur over Zhangjiakou City for SO₂, NO₂ CO and PSO₄ while simulated O₃ and H₂O₂ show large errors over Baoding city. Please explain how do porting process cause such patterns.

I'd suggest the authors discussing in the Conclusions and Discussion section any limitations of the current approach, which may warrant future refinement.

Line 173-177, 337-342: Please unify the tense of the sentence.

Line 354: Please clarify “30-min spatial resolution”.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-RC2
- CC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kai Cao, 19 May 2023
  
  GPU accelerators have great potential to improve the efficiency of air quality modeling. The authors have explained the steps taken to convert a PPM solver of horizontal advection for air quality model CAMx into a new Compute Unified Device Architecture C (CUDA C) code and how this optimization approach has resulted in significant improvement in computational efficiency. This paper presents a promising approach for using GPU accelerators in air quality modeling and provides valuable insights into the optimization measures that can be taken to improve the overall computing performance of model. The authors' findings can potentially benefit researchers in air quality modeling and related fields. My comments listed below.
  Response: We appreciate the editor for reviewing our manuscript and for the valuable suggestions, which we will address point by point in the following.
  1. The manuscript should be written more concisely, removing unnecessary material. For example, the information presented in Table 1 partly duplicates that presented in Figure 1b. Figure 9 doesn’t provide too much important information and can be moved to Supplementary.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. We have removed Table 1, and placed Figure 9 in the supplementary. The relevant expressions and contents in the paper have also been modified in lines 156-162 and 417-421, which are as follows:
  Lines 156-162: The VTune tool detects each module's runtime and the most time-consuming functions on P1. As shown in Figure 1b, the top four time-consuming modules are chemistry, diffusion, horizontal advection, and vertical advection in the CAMx model. In the above four modules, the top five most time-consuming programs are ebirate, hadvppm, tridiag, diffus, and ebisolv programs, and the total runtime of P1 is 325.1 seconds. Top1 and Top2's most time-consuming programs take 49.4 and 35.6 seconds, respectively.
  Lines 417-421: In terms of time series, the regionally averaged time series of the three versions are almost consistent (as is shown in Figure S2), and the maximum AEs for the above six species are 0.001ppbV, 0.005 ppbV, 0.002 ppbV, 0.03ppbV, 0.0001 ppbV and 0.0002 ug/m^3 , respectively, between the Fortran and CUDA C versions.
  2. The authors select the hadvppm program to implement the heterogeneous porting. It could benefit from providing some additional context about the motivation for selecting hadvppm program.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. There are some reasons for selecting hadvppm for heterogeneous porting. Firstly, the advection module is one of the compulsory modules of the air quality model, which is mainly used to simulate the transport process of air pollutants, and it is also a hotspot module detected by the Intel VTune tool. Then, typical air quality models CAMx, CMAQ, and NAQPMS include advection modules and use the exact PPM advection solver. The heterogeneous version developed in this study can be directly applied to the above models. Furthermore, the weather model (e.g., WRF) also contains an advection module, so this study's heterogeneous porting method and experience can be used for reference. We have revised this part in lines 163-173, which are as follows:
  By consideration, the hadvppm program was selected to carry out heterogeneous porting for some reasons. Firstly, the advection module is one of the compulsory modules of the air quality model, which is mainly used to simulate the transport process of air pollutants, and it is also a hotspot module detected by the Intel VTune tool. Then, typical air quality models CAMx, CMAQ, and NAQPMS include advection modules and use the exact PPM advection solver. The heterogeneous version developed in this study can be directly applied to the above models. Furthermore, the weather model (e.g., WRF) also contains an advection module, so this study's heterogeneous porting method and experience can be used for reference. Therefore, a GPU acceleration version of the HADVPPM scheme, namely GPU-HADVPPM, is built to improve CAMx performance.
  3. In Figure 5-7, large absolute errors mainly occur over Zhangjiakou City for SO₂, NO₂CO and PSO₄ while simulated O₃ and H₂O₂ show large errors over Baoding city. Please explain how do porting process cause such patterns.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. During the process of heterogeneous porting, the CUDA technology was used to convert the standard C code into CUDA C to make the hadvppm program computable on the GPU. However, due to the slight difference in data operation and accuracy between CPU and GPU(NVIDIA,2023), the concentration variable of hadvppm program appears to have minimal negative values (about -10^-4~-10^-9) when integrating on GPU. In order to allow the program to continue running, we forcibly replace these negative values with 10^-9. It is because these negative values are replaced by positive values that the simulation results are biased. Furthermore, we adopted the evaluation method of Wang et al. (2021) to compute the ratio between the root-mean-square-error and standard deviation of six species, such as SO₂, O₃, NO₂, CO, H₂O₂, and PSO₄. The results were 0.004%, 0.003%, 0.003%, 0.006%, 0.015%, and 0.004%, respectively, which were far less than the 0.2% mentioned by Wang et al. (2021), so the absolute errors of simulation results in this study are within the acceptable range. We have revised this part in lines 375-383, which are as follows:
  During the porting process, the primary error came from converting standard C to CUDA C, and the main reason was the hardware difference between the CPU and GPU. Due to the slight difference in data operation and accuracy between CPU and GPU(NVIDIA,2023), the concentration variable of hadvppm program appears to have minimal negative values (about -10^-4~-10^-9) when integrating on GPU. In order to allow the program to continue running, we forcibly replace these negative values with 10^-9. It is because these negative values are replaced by positive values that the simulation results are biased.
  4. I'd suggest the authors discussing in the Conclusions and Discussion section any limitations of the current approach, which may warrant future refinement.
  Response: Thanks for the constructive comment. There are some limitations of the current approach.
  (1) We currently implemented thread and block co-indexing to compute horizontal grid points in parallel. Given the CAMx model 3-dimensional grid computing characteristics, 3-dimensional thread and block co-indexing will be considered to compute 3-dimensional grid points in parallel.
  (2) The communication bandwidth of data transfer is one of the main issues for restricting the computing performance of CUDA C codes on GPUs. In this study, data transmission efficiency between CPU and GPU is improved only by reducing communication frequency. In the future, more technologies, such as pinned memory (Wang et al.,2016), will be considered to solve the communication bottleneck between CPU and GPU.
  (3) In order to further improve the overall computational efficiency of the CAMx model, the heterogeneous porting scheme proposed in this study will be considered to carry out the heterogeneous porting of other CAMx modules in the future.
  We have added this part in lines 600-614, which are as follows:
  However, there are some limitations of the current approach which are as follows:
  (1) We currently implemented thread and block co-indexing to compute horizontal grid points in parallel. Given the CAMx model 3-dimensional grid computing characteristics, 3-dimensional thread and block co-indexing will be considered to compute 3-dimensional grid points in parallel.
  (2) The communication bandwidth of data transfer is one of the main issues for restricting the computing performance of CUDA C codes on GPUs. This restriction not only holds true for GPU-HADVPPM, but also WRF module as well (Mielikainen et al., 2012b; Mielikainen et al., 2013b; Huang et al., 2013). In this study, data transmission efficiency between CPU and GPU is improved only by reducing communication frequency. In the future, more technologies, such as pinned memory (Wang et al.,2016), will be considered to solve the communication bottleneck between CPU and GPU.
  (3) In order to further improve the overall computational efficiency of the CAMx model, the heterogeneous porting scheme proposed in this study will be considered to carry out the heterogeneous porting of other CAMx modules in the future.
  5. Line 173-177, 337-342: Please unify the tense of the sentence.
  Response: Sorry for these mistakes. We have revised this part in lines 180-187 and 342-349, which are as follows:
  Lines 180-187: The heterogeneous scheme of CAMx-CUDA is shown in Figure 2. The second time-consuming hadvppm program in the CAMx model was selected to implement the heterogeneous porting. In order to map the hadvppm program to the GPU, the Fortran code was converted to standard C code. Then, CUDA programing language, which was tailor-made for NVIDIA, was added to convert the standard C code into CUDA C for data-parallel execution on GPU, as GPU-HADVPPM. It prepared the input data for GPU-HADVPPM by constructing random numbers and tested its offline performance on the GPU platform.
  Lines 342-349: The validation and evaluation of porting the HADVPPM scheme from the CPU to the GPU platform were conducted using offline and coupling performance experiments. First, we validated the result between different CAMx versions, and then the offline performance of the GPU-HADVPPM on a single GPU was tested by offline experiment. Finally, the coupling performance experiments illustrate its potential in three dimensions with varying chemical regimes. Sect.4.2 and Sect.4.4, the CAMx version of the HADVPPM scheme written by Fortran language, standard C, and CUDA C, is named F, C, and CUDA C, respectively.
  6. Line 354: Please clarify “30-min spatial resolution”.
  Response: Sorry for the confusion. Minute is the angular resolution. According to the conversion formula, 30-min is 0.5 degrees, and the corresponding range resolution is about 55.6 kilometers at mid-latitude. We have revised this part in line 361, which are as follows:
  30-min (about 55.6km at mid-latitude) spatial resolution
  
  Reference
  NVIDIA: Floating Point and IEEE 754 Compliance for NVIDIA GPUs. Release 12.1, available at: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/floating-point/#differences-from-x86 (last access: 18 May 2023), 2023.
  Wang, P., Jiang, J., Lin, P., Ding, M., Wei, J., Zhang, F., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Yu, Z., Zheng, W., Yu, Y., Chi, X., and Liu, H.: The GPU version of LASG/IAP Climate System Ocean Model version 3 (LICOM3) under the heterogeneous-compute interface for portability (HIP) framework and its large-scale application, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2781-2799, 10.5194/gmd-14-2781-2021, 2021.
  Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Li, F., Zhou, C., Hu, H., and Jiang, J.: GPU-RRTMG_SW: Accelerating a Shortwave Radiative Transfer Scheme on GPU, IEEE Access, 9, 84231-84240, 10.1109/access.2021.3087507, 2016.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-CC2
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-410', Qizhong Wu, 01 Jun 2023

We are thankful to the two reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments that help us improve the manuscript substantially. We have revised the manuscript accordingly. The point-to-point response to each comment is liast in the supplement, and the revised manuscript will be upload as soon as possible.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-AC1

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload

AR by Qizhong Wu on behalf of the Authors (01 Jun 2023) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (05 Jun 2023) by Xiaomeng Huang

AR by Qizhong Wu on behalf of the Authors (12 Jun 2023) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (20 Jun 2023) by Xiaomeng Huang

AR by Qizhong Wu on behalf of the Authors (24 Jun 2023) Manuscript

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

01 Aug 2023

GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: a high-efficiency parallel GPU design of the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for horizontal advection in an air quality model (CAMx V6.10)

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4367–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4367-2023, 2023

Short summary

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Supplement

https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-410-supplement

Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongqing Li, and Lanning Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 442 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	Supplement	BibTeX	EndNote
324	100	18	442	29	5	5

HTML: 324
PDF: 100
XML: 18
Total: 442
Supplement: 29
BibTeX: 5
EndNote: 5

Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2023)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Apr 2023	209	61	9	279
May 2023	53	17	6	76
Jun 2023	36	11	2	49
Jul 2023	26	11	1	38
Aug 2023	0
Sep 2023	0
Oct 2023	0
Nov 2023	0
Dec 2023	0
Jan 2024	0
Feb 2024	0
Mar 2024	0
Apr 2024	0
May 2024	0
Jun 2024	0
Jul 2024	0
Aug 2024	0
Sep 2024	0

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2023)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Apr 2023	209	61	9	279
May 2023	53	17	6	76
Jun 2023	36	11	2	49
Jul 2023	26	11	1	38
Aug 2023	0
Sep 2023	0
Oct 2023	0
Nov 2023	0
Dec 2023	0
Jan 2024	0
Feb 2024	0
Mar 2024	0
Apr 2024	0
May 2024	0
Jun 2024	0
Jul 2024	0
Aug 2024	0
Sep 2024	0

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 442 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 442 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%

Cited

Latest update: 03 Sep 2024

Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Preprint (6910 KB)
Metadata XML

Short summary

Offline performance experiments results show that the GPU-HADVPPM on V100 GPU can achieve up to more than one thousand (1113.6x) speedup to its original version on E5-2682 v4 CPU. A series of optimization measures are taken, the CAMx-CUDA model improves the computing efficiency by 128.4x on a single V100 GPU card. A parallel architecture with an MPI+CUDA hybrid paradigm is presented, and it can achieve up to 4.5x speedup when launch 8 CPU cores and 8 GPU cards.


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0

GPU-HADVPPM V1.0: high-efficient parallel GPU design of the Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for horizontal advection in air quality model (CAMx V6.10)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

Interactive discussion

Interactive discussion

Peer review completion

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

Supplement

Viewed

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Cited

1 citations as recorded by crossref.