the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bridging the spatial gaps of the Ammonia Monitoring Network using satellite ammonia measurements
Abstract. Ammonia (NH3) is a key precursor to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and a primary form of reactive nitrogen. The limited observations of NH3 hinders further understanding of its impacts on air quality, climate, and biodiversity. Currently, NH3 ground monitoring networks are limited in number across the globe, and even in the most established networks, large spatial gaps exist between sites and only a few sites have records that span longer than a decade. Satellite NH3 observations can be used to discern trends and fill spatial gaps in networks, but many factors influence the syntheses of the vastly different spatiotemporal scales between surface networks and satellite measurements. To this end, we intercompared surface NH3 data from the Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) and satellite NH3 total columns from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) in the contiguous United States (CONUS) and then performed trend analyses using both datasets. We explored the sensitivity of correlations between the two datasets to factors such as satellite data availability and distribution over the surface measurement period as well as agreement within selected spatial and temporal windows. Given the short lifetime of atmospheric ammonia and consequently sharp gradients, smaller spatial windows show better agreement than larger ones except in areas of relatively uniform, low concentrations where large windows and more satellite measurements improve the signal-to-noise ratio. A critical factor in the comparison is having satellite measurements across most of the measurement period of the monitoring site. When IASI data are available for at least 80 % days of AMoN’s 2-week sampling period within a 25 km spatial window of a given site, IASI NH3 column concentrations and the AMoN NH3 surface concentrations have a correlation of 0.74, demonstrating the feasibility of using satellite NH3 columns to bridge the spatial gaps existing in the surface network NH3 concentrations. Both IASI and AMoN show increasing NH3 concentrations across CONUS (median: 6.8 % · yr−1 vs. 6.7 % · yr−1) in the last decade (2008–2018), stressing the rising importance of NH3 in terms of nitrogen deposition. NH3 trends for AMoN sites correlates with IASI NH3 trend IASI and AMoN NH3 trend (r = 0.66) and show a similar spatial pattern, with the highest increases in the Midwest and eastern U.S., and NH3 trend for AMoN sites correlates with IASI NH3 trend (r = 0.66). In spring and summer, increases of NH3 were larger than 10 % · yr−1 in the eastern U.S. and Midwest (cropland dominated) and western U.S. (pastureland dominated), respectively. In terms of trend in NH3 hotpots (defined as regions where the IASI NH3 column is larger than the 95th percentile of 11-year CONUS map, 6.7 × 1015 molec/cm2), these largest emissions sources are also experiencing increasing concentrations over time with the median of NH3 trend is 4.7 % · yr−1. IASI data show large NH3 increases in urban areas (8.1 % · yr−1), including 8 of the top 10 most populous regions in the CONUS, where AMoN sites are sparse. The increasing NH3 could have detrimental effects on nearby eco-sensitive regions through nitrogen deposition and on aerosol chemistry in the densely populated urban areas, hence needs immediate attention.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1569 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1569 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Apr 2023
Please see atatched document for full review.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-190/egusphere-2023-190-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Jun 2023
This study is well-organized and important for research community. This reviewer has two minor comments. 1)the authors should explain why only the data ended on 2018, but not 2022? 2) can urban atmospheric NH3 prevent the previously formed NH4NO3 from evaporating? The current discussion is imbalance.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-190-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-190/egusphere-2023-190-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Apr 2023
Please see atatched document for full review.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-190/egusphere-2023-190-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Jun 2023
This study is well-organized and important for research community. This reviewer has two minor comments. 1)the authors should explain why only the data ended on 2018, but not 2022? 2) can urban atmospheric NH3 prevent the previously formed NH4NO3 from evaporating? The current discussion is imbalance.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-190-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-190/egusphere-2023-190-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Rui Wang, 16 Aug 2023
Peer review completion
Post-review adjustments
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
582 | 193 | 20 | 795 | 8 | 12 |
- HTML: 582
- PDF: 193
- XML: 20
- Total: 795
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Da Pan
Xuehui Guo
Lieven Clarisse
Martin Van Damme
Pierre-François Coheur
Cathy Clerbaux
Melissa Puchalski
Mark A. Zondlo
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1569 KB) - Metadata XML