the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Fast uplift in the Southern Patagonian Andes due to long and short term deglaciation and the asthenospheric window underneath
Veleda Astarte Paiva Muller
Pietro Sternai
Christian Sue
Abstract. An asthenospheric window underneath much of the South American continent increases the heat flow in the Southern Patagonian Andes, where glacial-interglacial cycles drive the building and melting of the Patagonian Icefields since the latest Miocene. The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) was reached ~20000 years ago, and an acceleration of the deglaciation rate is recorded since the Little Ice Age (LIA), ~400 years ago. Fast uplift rates of up to 41±3 mm/yr are measured by GNSS around the Southern Patagonian Icefield and currently ascribed to post-LIA lithospheric rebound, but the possible longer-term post-LGM rebound is poorly constrained. These uplift rates, in addition, are one order of magnitude higher than those measured on other glaciated orogens (e.g., the European Alps), which raises questions about the role of the asthenospheric window in affecting the vertical surface displacement rates. Here, we perform geodynamic thermo-mechanical numerical modelling to estimate the surface uplift rates induced by post-LIA and post-LGM deglaciation accounting for temperature dependent rheologies and different thermal regimes in the asthenosphere. Our modelled maximum postglacial rebound matches the observed uplift ratebudget only when both post-LIA and post-LGM deglaciation are accounted for and if a standard continental mantle potential temperature is increased by 150–200 °C. The asthenospheric window thus play a key role in controlling the magnitude of presently observed uplift rates in the Southern Patagonian Andes.
- Preprint
(13986 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Veleda Astarte Paiva Muller et al.
Status: open (until 22 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1711', Federico Davila, 11 Sep 2023
reply
Dear Editor
The manuscript deals with an interesting thermo-mechanical model to estimate uplift values derived from deglaciation in a scenario with temperature anomaly development (slab window). The estimated values were compared to the very high uplift amounts in Patagonia derived from GNSS studies.
I am adding in the EGU system an edited pdf, where authors will be able to read my comments in the appropriate places of their manuscript. But essentially, my main concerns are related to the model setup, associated with the glacial history of any area, which might impact on results and interpretations.
First, I wonder how the results would be influenced by an ice sheet that reduces from a leading edge, migrating backward (like a river knickpoint), instead of reducing homogeneously the ice thickness in time.
Second, the authors disregard the influence of tectonics because of the analyzed time lapse. However, I wonder how erosion might influence uplift considering glacial settings show strong exhumation. This was demonstrated using thermochronology (Thomson et al., 2010, Davies et al., 2020; among others).
Kind regards
Federico Davila
Veleda Astarte Paiva Muller et al.
Veleda Astarte Paiva Muller et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
125 | 47 | 10 | 182 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 125
- PDF: 47
- XML: 10
- Total: 182
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1