the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Current status of model predictions on volatile organic compounds and impacts on surface ozone predictions during summer in China
Abstract. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play a crucial role in the formation of tropospheric ozone (O3) and secondary organic aerosols. VOC emissions are generally considered to have larger uncertainties compared to other pollutants, such as sulphur dioxide and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Although predictions of O3 and PM2.5 have been extensively evaluated in air quality modelling studies, there has been limited reporting on the evaluation of VOCs, mainly due to a lack of routine VOCs measurements at multiple sites. In this study, we utilized VOCs measurements from the ATMSYC project at 28 sites across China and assessed the predicted VOCs concentrations using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with the widely used Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC). The ratio of predicted to observed total VOCs was found to be 0.74 ± 0.40, with underpredictions ranging from 2.05 to 50.61 ppbv (5.77 % to 85.40 %) at 24 sites. A greater bias in VOCs predictions was observed in industrial cities in the north and southwest, such as Jinan, Shijiazhuang, Lanzhou, Chengdu, and Guiyang. In terms of different VOC components, alkanes, alkenes, non-naphthalene aromatics (ARO2MN), and alkynes were consistently underpredicted, with prediction to observation ratios of 0.53 ± 0.38, 0.51 ± 0.48, 0.31 ± 0.38, and 0.41 ± 0.47, respectively. Sensitivity experiments were conducted to assess the impact of the VOCs prediction bias on O3 predictions. While emission adjustments improved the model performance for VOCs, resulting in a ratio of total VOCs to 0.86 ± 0.47, they also exacerbated O3 overprediction relative to the base case by 0.62 % to 6.27 % across the sites. This study demonstrates that current modelling setups and emission inventories are likely to underpredict VOCs concentrations, and this underprediction of VOCs contributes to lower O3 predictions in China.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2483 KB)
-
Supplement
(4917 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2483 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4917 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1358', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Aug 2023
This paper conducted a very comprehensive investigation of the model simulation of VOC using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model and compared it with an excellent observation dataset including 28 sites across China. On one hand, they showed an overall underestimation of the VOC concentration, these biases often occurred in industrial cities. On the other hand, this VOC model simulation bias may lead to lower O3 predictions in China. The gap between VOC model simulation and observation may also influence the diagnosis of ozone production sensitivity regimes and other air pollution problems like the atmospheric oxidation capacity and the secondary aerosol formations. Therefore, I believe this topic is fundamental and critical to the atmospheric science community. This paper is well-written, and the data analysis convinced me. I would like to recommend this paper be published in ACP subject to add more detailed information about the VOC measurement as well as some minor corrections.
- In the method Section, although the author cited the literature to support the introduction of VOC measurement. However, I strongly recommend that the authors add a more detailed description of measurement techniques and uncertainties, as this part may also greatly affect the comparison of observations and simulations. Considering that there are currently large differences in the consistency between models and observations in different regions, the authors need to clarify further whether VOC observations in all sites have adopted uniform sample-analysis and data quality control standards, in other words, whether these systematic differences may be due to uncertainties in VOC measurements?
- I suggest the author further highlight the problem of overprediction of HCHO since it is very important for ozone formation. Although the VOC is underpredicted, the modeled high HCHO may narrow the real gap between the simulated and observed ozone.
- Figure 2 NME and NMB should give the full name.
- Figure 4-6 missed the caption, making it hard for the readers to follow the paper.
- Figure 3 y-axis ppbv change to concentration (ppbv).
- Table S1. “Sites in the PRD belong to Urban” change to “Sites in the PRD except GZ belong to Urban”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1358-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1358/egusphere-2023-1358-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1358', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Oct 2023
The specific comments have been included in the attachment.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1358/egusphere-2023-1358-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1358', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Aug 2023
This paper conducted a very comprehensive investigation of the model simulation of VOC using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model and compared it with an excellent observation dataset including 28 sites across China. On one hand, they showed an overall underestimation of the VOC concentration, these biases often occurred in industrial cities. On the other hand, this VOC model simulation bias may lead to lower O3 predictions in China. The gap between VOC model simulation and observation may also influence the diagnosis of ozone production sensitivity regimes and other air pollution problems like the atmospheric oxidation capacity and the secondary aerosol formations. Therefore, I believe this topic is fundamental and critical to the atmospheric science community. This paper is well-written, and the data analysis convinced me. I would like to recommend this paper be published in ACP subject to add more detailed information about the VOC measurement as well as some minor corrections.
- In the method Section, although the author cited the literature to support the introduction of VOC measurement. However, I strongly recommend that the authors add a more detailed description of measurement techniques and uncertainties, as this part may also greatly affect the comparison of observations and simulations. Considering that there are currently large differences in the consistency between models and observations in different regions, the authors need to clarify further whether VOC observations in all sites have adopted uniform sample-analysis and data quality control standards, in other words, whether these systematic differences may be due to uncertainties in VOC measurements?
- I suggest the author further highlight the problem of overprediction of HCHO since it is very important for ozone formation. Although the VOC is underpredicted, the modeled high HCHO may narrow the real gap between the simulated and observed ozone.
- Figure 2 NME and NMB should give the full name.
- Figure 4-6 missed the caption, making it hard for the readers to follow the paper.
- Figure 3 y-axis ppbv change to concentration (ppbv).
- Table S1. “Sites in the PRD belong to Urban” change to “Sites in the PRD except GZ belong to Urban”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1358-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1358/egusphere-2023-1358-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1358', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Oct 2023
The specific comments have been included in the attachment.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1358/egusphere-2023-1358-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jianlin Hu, 04 Nov 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
410 | 139 | 22 | 571 | 50 | 14 | 15 |
- HTML: 410
- PDF: 139
- XML: 22
- Total: 571
- Supplement: 50
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Yongliang She
Jingyi Li
Xiaopu Lyu
Momei Qin
Xiaodong Xie
Kangjia Gong
Fei Ye
Jianjiong Mao
Lin Huang
Jianlin Hu
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2483 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4917 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper