Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1364
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1364
 
19 Dec 2022
19 Dec 2022
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Impact of deoxygenation and warming on global marine species in the 21st century

Anne L. Morée1,2, Tayler M. Clarke3, William W. L. Cheung3, and Thomas L. Frölicher1,2 Anne L. Morée et al.
  • 1Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
  • 2Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
  • 3Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Abstract. Ocean temperature and dissolved oxygen shape marine habitats in interplay with species’ physiological characteristics. Therefore, the observed and projected warming and deoxygenation in the 21st century of the world’s oceans may strongly affect species’ habitats. Here, we implement an extended version of the Aerobic Growth Index (AGI), which quantifies whether a viable population of a species can be sustained in a particular location. We assess the impact of projected deoxygenation and warming on the contemporary habitat of 47 representative marine species covering the epipelagic, mesopelagic/bathypelagic, and demersal realms. AGI is calculated for these species for the historical period and into the 21st century using bias-corrected environmental data from six comprehensive Earth System Models. While habitat viability decreases nearly everywhere with global warming, impact of this decrease is strongly species-dependent. Most species lose less than 5 % of their contemporary habitat volume over the 21st century even at 3 °C of global warming relative to preindustrial, although some individual species are projected to incur losses 2–3 times greater than that. We find that the contemporary spatiotemporal variability of O2 and temperature (and hence AGI) provides a quantifiable measure of a species’ vulnerability to change. Species’ vulnerability is the most important indicator for large (>5 %) potential habitat losses – not relative or absolute changes in habitat viability (i.e., AGIrel or ΔAGI), temperature or O2. Loss of contemporary habitat is for most epipelagic species driven by warming of ocean water and is therefore expanded with increased levels of global warming. In the mesopelagic/bathypelagic and demersal realms habitat loss is also affected by pO2 decrease for some species. Our analysis is constrained by the uncertainties involved in species-specific critical thresholds, which we quantify, by data limitations on 3D species distributions as well as by high uncertainty in model O2 projections in equatorial regions. Focus on these topics in future research will strengthen our confidence in assessing climate-change driven losses of contemporary habitat across the global oceans.

Anne L. Morée et al.

Status: open (until 15 Feb 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1364', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Feb 2023 reply

Anne L. Morée et al.

Anne L. Morée et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 347 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
256 84 7 347 2 4
  • HTML: 256
  • PDF: 84
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 347
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 334 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 334 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Feb 2023
Download
Short summary
Ocean temperature and oxygen shape marine habitats together with species’ characteristics. We calculated the impacts of projected 21st century warming and oxygen loss on the habitat extent of 47 marine species, as well as describing the drivers of these impacts. Most species lose less than 5 % of their habitat even at 3 °C of global warming, but some species incur losses 2–3 times greater than that. We also calculate which species may be most vulnerable to climate change and why this is the case.