Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-658
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-658
09 Apr 2026
 | 09 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Antarctic sea ice response to meltwater due to Antarctic ice sheet mass loss in a multi-model ensemble

Andrew G. Pauling, Inga J. Smith, Torge Martin, Jeff K. Ridley, David P. Stevens, Max Thomas, Rebecca L. Beadling, Christopher Danek, Tore Hattermann, Qian Li, John Marshall, Morven Muilwijk, Ariaan Purich, and Neil C. Swart

Abstract. We present the first multi-model study of the Antarctic sea ice response to enhanced meltwater due to dynamic mass loss from the Antarctic ice sheet. This meltwater flux (and its future increase under global warming) is not included in the most recent state-of-the-art climate model simulations used in CMIP6, representing a missing source of freshwater to the Southern Ocean. Previous climate model simulations have shown a wide range of responses in Antarctic sea ice and climate when this missing meltwater is introduced. Here, we analyze a new suite of 11 models comprising 43 ensemble members to assess the response to 0.1 Sv of Antarctic meltwater input at the ocean surface, evenly distributed around the Antarctic coastline under pre-industrial control forcing. Antarctic sea ice area increases in all models. However, there is a wide range in the response, with annual mean increases ranging from 0.71 to 4.14 million km2. There is also substantial variation in both the spatial distribution and the time scale of the sea ice response. The intermodel spread in sea ice response is influenced by the model mean-state sea ice area and volume, the prevalence of open-ocean deep convection, and the mean-state stratification of the ocean. These findings highlight the importance of model mean-state biases in determining the response to a missing Antarctic meltwater boundary condition.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Andrew G. Pauling, Inga J. Smith, Torge Martin, Jeff K. Ridley, David P. Stevens, Max Thomas, Rebecca L. Beadling, Christopher Danek, Tore Hattermann, Qian Li, John Marshall, Morven Muilwijk, Ariaan Purich, and Neil C. Swart

Status: open (until 21 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Andrew G. Pauling, Inga J. Smith, Torge Martin, Jeff K. Ridley, David P. Stevens, Max Thomas, Rebecca L. Beadling, Christopher Danek, Tore Hattermann, Qian Li, John Marshall, Morven Muilwijk, Ariaan Purich, and Neil C. Swart

Model code and software

andrewpauling/sofiaice_tier1: sofiaice_tier1 Andrew Pauling https://zenodo.org/records/18476161

Andrew G. Pauling, Inga J. Smith, Torge Martin, Jeff K. Ridley, David P. Stevens, Max Thomas, Rebecca L. Beadling, Christopher Danek, Tore Hattermann, Qian Li, John Marshall, Morven Muilwijk, Ariaan Purich, and Neil C. Swart

Viewed

Total article views: 1 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
0 0 1 1 0 0
  • HTML: 0
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 1
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Climate models typically do not include meltwater entering the Southern Ocean due to Antarctic ice sheet mass loss. Previous work shows this meltwater drives sea ice growth, but the varying responses have been difficult to compare across models. We ran 11 climate models using the same meltwater input and found a wide range of sea ice responses depending on the background state in each model. Understanding this uncertainty in response is important for future projections of Antarctic sea ice.
Share