the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assessing the effect of land cover on ISBA snow water equivalent simulations over Europe
Abstract. An accurate representation of the land surface is essential for simulating the exchange of energy, water and carbon between the land and the atmosphere. This study evaluates the impact of land cover representation on snow simulations in the Interactions Between Soil, Biosphere and Atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model in Europe between 2010 and 2022. The study employs the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5 atmospheric forcing dataset. Offline simulation experiments were conducted using two different versions of the model to prescribe land cover. The most recent version uses the latest land cover data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI). The model's ability to reproduce snow dynamics was evaluated through a comparison of the simulations with ESA CCI satellite snow water equivalent (SWE) retrievals and ERA5 snow analyses. The ERA5 analysis shows the highest level of agreement with satellite observations of SWE at the domain scale. On average, both the ERA5 and ISBA simulations tend to overestimate SWE compared to the CCI SWE. However, it is also possible that the CCI SWE product underestimates the actual SWE. This bias is particularly large during the warm winter of 2020, while the scaled SWE anomalies are comparable to those observed by ESA CCI and ERA5. Using ESA CCI land cover data reduces the ISBA SWE bias by around 33 %, with this reduction being observed over most of the domain. These findings emphasise the importance of accurate land cover data for improving snow representation in land surface models and highlight the need for updated vegetation information in future snow-related applications.
- Preprint
(1992 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(420 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Mar 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-65', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Feb 2026 reply
Data sets
ESA CCI Global Land Cover Maps, Version 2.0.7 P. Defourny et al. https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/b382ebe6679d44b8b0e68ea4ef4b701c/
ESA CCI Aqua MODIS LST data, Version 4 D. Ghent et al. https://doi.org/10.5285/d56a6215ce394ddd8dff6bea5dbb0780
ESA CCI snow water equivalent, Version 3.1 K. Luojus et al. https://doi.org/10.5285/9d9bfc488ec54b1297eca2c9662f9c81
Model code and software
SURFEX, Version 9 CNRM https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/surfex/data/OPEN-SURFEX/open_surfex_v9_0_0_20231024.tar.gz
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 52 | 12 | 157 | 20 | 14 | 21 |
- HTML: 93
- PDF: 52
- XML: 12
- Total: 157
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of “Assessing the effect of land cover on ISBA snow water equivalent simulations over Europe” by O. Rojas-Munoz.
In this manuscript, the authors are presenting different simulations of snow water equivalent (SWE) across Europe with the ISBA model using two different land cover databases. They compared their simulations against ERA5 snow analyses as well as against the ESA CCI SWE databases. They showed that their simulation with the newest land cover database provided on average better SWE estimates over the full domain, but still some discrepancies with ERA5 or the SWE database could be observed. I found the paper well written and clear. I think this manuscript is fit for publication after a few improvements. Additional analysis is needed to examine how land cover changes between the two databases affect SWE estimates, which may explain why performance has declined in regions like Northern Europe.
Major comments:
Overall, the manuscript should place greater emphasis on comparing how SWE biases change spatially between the old and new land cover datasets for each vegetation type, as this represents the central contribution of the study.
Minor comments: