Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5107
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5107
31 Aug 2026
 | 31 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Plant Effective Conductance Fails to Predict Soil–Plant Hydraulics in Sandy Soils

Eileen Lucia Waeber, Fabian J. P. Wankmüller, Sara Di Bert, and Andrea Carminati

Abstract. Atmospheric and soil dryness impose increasing limitations in the hydraulic pathway of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (SPAC), leading to a decrease in the hydraulic conductivity of many elements, such as soil, soil–root interface, xylem, and leaves. Many SPAC models simplify the flow through this series of hydraulic conductances to a single effective conductance that varies as a function of the xylem water potential. This effective conductance is expected to implicitly account for soil characteristics, including soil texture-specific hydraulic limitations. However, it is unclear whether such an approach can properly reproduce the non-linear effects of soil texture-specific conductivities. This paper aims to explore under what conditions reducing the SPAC to a function of internal plant water status accurately captures the relation between transpiration rate and leaf and soil water potential, and when larger model complexity is required. For this purpose, a plant-only model, where the conductances along the SPAC solely depend on plant water potential, was compared to a more detailed model incorporating the hydraulics of varying soils. We demonstrate that the former simplification works well in fine-grained soils, such as clay and silt loam, but fails in more coarse-textured soils like sandy loam, where the pronounced non-linearity of its hydraulic functions requires explicit description. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of key parameters within the full SPAC model reveals that the soil hydraulic properties have a significantly stronger impact on plant transpiration in sandy soils, as opposed to finer soils, where internal plant traits are more influential on plant–water relations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Eileen Lucia Waeber, Fabian J. P. Wankmüller, Sara Di Bert, and Andrea Carminati

Status: open (until 12 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Eileen Lucia Waeber, Fabian J. P. Wankmüller, Sara Di Bert, and Andrea Carminati

Model code and software

Plant Effective Conductance Fails to Predict Soil–Plant Hydraulics in Sandy Soils Eileen L. Waeber https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22093435

Eileen Lucia Waeber, Fabian J. P. Wankmüller, Sara Di Bert, and Andrea Carminati
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Water flow models are often based on hydraulic variables, which are solely dependent on internal plant traits. We found that this approach is valid in fine soils, but fails in sandy soils, where it is crucial to explicitly include soil hydraulic properties for an accurate description. Our paper also shows that soil properties have a larger impact on plant transpiration in coarser-grained soils. Knowing this, we can make better predictions of plant water use and drought responses in the future.
Share