Tidal state as a source of sampling uncertainty in instantaneous-to-daily scaling of mangrove FAPAR
Abstract. A fixed satellite overpass samples mangrove canopies at different stages of the tidal cycle, but the resulting temporal-scaling uncertainty is rarely quantified. We combined half-hourly eddy-covariance measurements from the Qinglangang Mangrove Reserve with harmonically reconstructed water levels to test whether tidal state covaried with an apparent FAPAR proxy and could bias its representation at overpass time. The proxy was 9.8 % higher during exposed than flooded periods, and changepoint analysis located a site-specific transition near −0.3 m relative to mean sea level. A post-changepoint sensitivity analysis based on state-specific light-use-efficiency estimates had a coefficient of variation of 3.7 %, suggesting that calibration choice alone was unlikely to explain the contrast; however, the proxy was not an independent optical measurement of FAPAR. Across 163 valid days, the median instantaneous-to-daily ratio was 0.83, and applying this site-calibrated ratio reduced in-sample RMSE by 28 % relative to a unity-ratio baseline. Sentinel-2 imagery showed directionally compatible spatial patterns, but elevation uncertainty and spatial autocorrelation limited inference. The analysis identifies tidal phase as a source of sampling uncertainty rather than demonstrating a transferable tide-conditioned correction. Testing such a correction will require optical FAPAR, measured water levels, temporally independent evaluation, and additional mangrove sites.
审稿人意见
建议:小修
本手稿探讨了潮汐状态如何影响使用瞬时红树林FAPAR估算值作为日间平均值的代理指标。该主题具有相关性,分析清晰,作者对单站点研究的局限性也保持了恰当的谨慎。我建议进行小修。无需额外的实地实验。
请同时报告统一比率和校准比率的绝对RMSE值,在提及28%降低时保留“in-sample”,并检查为什么Sentinel-2 FAPAR值远低于塔站得出的值和MODIS值。
该论文对潮汐状态相关的采样风险进行了有益的评估。在这些澄清之后,它应该适合发表。