Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4488
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4488
12 Aug 2026
 | 12 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Towards Resolving Equifinality in Aerosol-Cloud Radiative Forcing Through Process-Level Constraints

McKenna Stanford, Naser Mahfouz, Johannes Muelmenstaedt, August Mikkelsen, and Susannah Burrows

Abstract. Equifinality—where multiple parameter combinations produce indistinguishable climate states—is a fundamental obstacle to calibrating Earth system models (ESMs). Parameter sets that agree well with the observed mean state can produce dramatically different responses to external perturbations, reflecting a mathematical non-uniqueness that standard calibration approaches cannot resolve. This poses a critical challenge for constraining the effective radiative forcing due to aerosol-cloud interactions (ERFACI), which depends sensitively on cloud responses to aerosol perturbations. We use a perturbed parameter ensemble that, as a minimal working example, varies only two parameters related to warm-rain formation (autoconversion and accretion) and constrain on synthetic observations in a perfect-model setup. Even under ideal conditions, radiation-only constraints produce a fundamentally degenerate, bimodal ERFACI posterior. Incorporating the observable cloud state (liquid water path, 𝔏) for warm marine stratocumulus clouds can resolve this bimodality, but its utility diminishes with large observational uncertainty. A far more robust constraint is achieved by directly targeting the underlying physical process rates that modulate 𝔏. Process-rate constraints effectively eliminate bimodality and dramatically reduce posterior uncertainty even under large assumed observational uncertainties. As process rates are not directly observable, we test their observable proxies as a tractable alternative, finding they offer only limited additional value over cloud state due to their emergent behavior. These results establish a critical principle for ESM calibration: to achieve robust constraints on ERFACI and beyond, it is necessary to constrain both the emergent climate state and the physical pathways that govern its formation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
McKenna Stanford, Naser Mahfouz, Johannes Muelmenstaedt, August Mikkelsen, and Susannah Burrows

Status: open (until 23 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
McKenna Stanford, Naser Mahfouz, Johannes Muelmenstaedt, August Mikkelsen, and Susannah Burrows
McKenna Stanford, Naser Mahfouz, Johannes Muelmenstaedt, August Mikkelsen, and Susannah Burrows
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
A key challenge in calibrating climate models is equifinality, where models get the right answer for the wrong reasons. We show that matching Earth's energy balance alone is insufficient to constrain the radiative response to aerosol-cloud interactions. Constraining the cloud state helps but is fragile under large uncertainty. The most robust approach targets the physical processes forming clouds and rain, establishing that we must validate not just what a model produces, but how it produces it.
Share