Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798
01 Jun 2026
 | 01 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Surface impacts of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs): Comparison of 2018 and 2019 SSWs in SNAPSI experiments

Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang

Abstract. Stratospheric Sudden Warmings (SSWs) significantly affect surface climate in boreal winter. However, their impacts vary considerably from one event to another: more than one-third of SSWs are not followed by expected tropospheric anomalies. To isolate the forced responses to SSWs, this study analyzes model experiments from the Stratospheric Nudging And Predictable Surface Impacts (SNAPSI) project, where the stratospheric zonal-mean state is nudged using either observations or climatology. The differences between the two experiments are examined within a multi-model ensemble framework. Nudging experiments conducted for the 2018 SSW, which featured significant tropospheric responses, and the 2019 SSW, which showed none, reveal that both SSWs consistently drive a negative Northern Annular Mode over time. The forced tropospheric response is primarily driven by an increase in Arctic surface pressure resulting from poleward mass fluxes in the stratosphere and upper troposphere. The poleward mass fluxes are initially induced by the zonal wind nudging in the middle stratosphere and subsequently by the eddy heat and momentum fluxes in the stratosphere and upper troposphere. This result suggests that while SSWs intrinsically drive tropospheric anomalies, the internal variability in the troposphere strengthens or suppresses the forced anomalies from the stratosphere, which may determine the existence of expected tropospheric anomalies following SSWs.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Weather and Climate Dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang

Status: open (until 13 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang
Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study investigates how Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) influences surface climate. By comparing multi-model simulations, we isolated and quantified the role of SSWs. Results reveal that poleward mass transport during SSWs induces high pressure over the Arctic, driving changes in extratropical circulations. While SSWs alter the troposphere, chaotic internal weather variability can amplify or suppress their influence, explaining the differing surface impacts following SSWs.
Share