the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Air temperature changes in Wrocław (SW Poland) in 1773–81 based on a newly discovered series of meteorological measurements
Abstract. The article presents a description of a newly discovered series of meteorological measurements made in Wrocław (SW Poland) in 1773–81 and its importance for climate analysis. The series is the third-oldest available for Wrocław. The 1773–81 observations were made by Johann Ephraim Scheibel on the premises of the Gymnasium that belonged to the Church of St Elizabeth (central Wrocław). Meteorological observations of air temperature and atmospheric pressure were made three times a day (morning, midday and evening) – or twice a day (morning and evening) for atmospheric precipitation, wind (including direction and force) and humidity. The meteorological registers were published in the newspaper Oekonomische Nachrichten der Patriotischen Gesellschaft in Schlesien issued in Wrocław in the years 1773–81. Between 1773 and 1776, the meteorological data were published in each weekly edition of the newspaper. From 1777 onwards, the data were published for the entire month and in three-month blocks in the last two years. In addition to the measurements, J. E. Scheibel also published, in the same source, between one and three pages of weather descriptions for each month or block of two to three months. The air temperature in Wrocław during the period 1773–81 was 1.2 °C and 0.3 °C warmer than in the respective equivalent periods 100 and 200 years later (i.e., 1873–81 and 1973–81) but 2.1 °C colder than in the most recent period (2013–21). The increase in temperature between the study period and the most recent period was greatest in summer (2.8 °C) and smallest in spring (1.4 °C).
- Preprint
(2492 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(129 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6326', Christian Pfister, 20 Jan 2026
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6326', Thomas Pliemon, 25 Jan 2026
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6326', Anonymous Referee #3, 02 Feb 2026
In this paper, the authors describe a newly recovered series of temperature observations from a site in Wrocław covering the period 1773–1781. Such series are extremely valuable because—despite the inherent limitations of early instrumental observations—they provide data at a much higher temporal resolution than is achievable with most proxy records. In particular, they capture the full seasonal cycle, whereas many proxy series are restricted to specific parts of the year (for example, growing-season temperatures).
The period studied is also of particular interest, as it coincides with a time when the competing influences of solar variability and volcanic forcing remain poorly constrained, and which broadly corresponds to a phase of relatively cooler average temperatures.
The temperature observations presented appear to be highly reliable and to have been recorded using a responsive instrument. I was pleased to see the comparison with temperature estimates from the ModE-RA reanalysis, and I fully agree with the authors that assimilation of these data into palaeoreanalysis products would further enhance their value, particularly if combined with the construction of a longer regional temperature series.
The paper primarily consists of a description of the data and an evaluation of the observations against other available series. As such, it represents an incremental contribution; nevertheless, it is a valuable one and fits well within the remit of the journal.
Specific comments
Line 21: “atmospheric” is not needed before “precipitation”.
Line 44: The definition of the aims of historical climatology is too limited. For example, Brázdil et al. (2005, p. 366, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5924-1) describe three aims of historical climatology:
(i) reconstructing temporal and spatial patterns of weather and climate, as well as climate-related natural disasters, for the period prior to the establishment of national meteorological networks (mainly over the last millennium);
(ii) investigating the vulnerability of past societies and economies to climate variability, climate extremes, and natural disasters;
(iii) exploring past discourses and social representations of climate.Line 160: It would be useful to place the link to the data in a more prominent location, for example in a dedicated section at the end of the paper titled “Data Availability”, with a brief description of the repository.
Line 142: Change “exposition” to “exposure”.
Figure 4: The morning and Tmin curves are shown in the same colour; please revise the figure to allow clear visual distinction.
Figure 9: Please invert the sign of the difference so that, for example, the grey bars represent positive values.
Around page 15: Please include a time series (1773–1781) showing the difference between the ModE-RA series representative of Wrocław and the newly recovered temperature series. This could be included as a supplementary figure if space is limited.
Line 404: Please explain why the reconstructed temperature series should be expected to outperform the palaeoreanalysis.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6326-RC3 -
RC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6326', Stefan Bronnimann, 18 Feb 2026
The paper presents a newly discovered, historical meteorological record from Wroclaw in Poland, covering the years 1773-1781. It is a relevant addition to the existing record in Wroclaw, which began in 1791. Because the gap between the two records can be filled with data from nearby Zagan (1781-1792), a long record spanning more than 250 years ca be generated.
The paper is describes the record and some analyses. It is relevant and within the scope of the journal. However, I have some suggestion that I would like the authors to take in to account.
Quality Control: The authors should elaborate more on how they perform the quality control. A number of standard checks are available: Range checks, checks of large steps, comparing morning, noon and evening measurements, checking for constant values. The series could and should be compared with those of Berlin and Prag at a daily scale. After 1779, outliers could even be compared against Warsaw, although the distance is large.
Is the series homogenised? I don't really see this described. But there is the sentence "The correction of historical mean monthly temperature data in Wrocław was necessary because the Prague series was homogenised, which means that the historical data were also corrected to be comparable to present-day data." So how were the data "corrected", what was the reference, which tests were applied? I think the authors should refrain from making statements about the temperature difference to more recent periods.
The paper says a lot about temperature, though very desceiptive, but very little about the other measurements I think pressure would be very valuable, and also precipitation (which was more rarely measured) and humidity would deserve more description. Conversely, I don't see much value in tabulating means.
The comparison with ModE-RA is best performed on the scale of monthly-to-decadal variability. Longer term trends and changes of longer periods in this data set are from model simulations and not from observations.
Minor:
L. 28: I think comparisons over long time periods are difficult since the series is not homogenised.
In the Introduction, perhaps give a somewhat broader context on enlightenment science activities in Poland ("Patriotische Gesellschaft in Schlesien").
L. 156: Weighted averages: How calculated?Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6326-RC4
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | 72 | 27 | 329 | 37 | 14 | 25 |
- HTML: 230
- PDF: 72
- XML: 27
- Total: 329
- Supplement: 37
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 25
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The article presents a recently discovered series of meteorological measurements made in Wrocław (SW Poland) in 1773–81 comprising daily observations of air temperature and atmospheric pressure, precipitation, wind force and direction.. The analysis focuses on air temperature extending the regular temperature series for Wrocław back to 1773. the scientific methods and assumptions valid and clearly outlined? The paper is clearly structured and the figures are of high quality. As a result, the Wroclaw series will be the longest temperature series in Poland.
The article should be published with minor revisions.