Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-897
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-897
07 Mar 2025
 | 07 Mar 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Assessing Subseasonal Forecast Skill for Use in Predicting US Coastal Inundation Risk

John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu

Abstract. Developing predictions of coastal flooding risk on subseasonal timescales (2–6 weeks in advance) is an emerging priority for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). In this study, we assess the ability of two current operational forecast systems, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) and the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques climate model (CNRM), to make subseasonal ensemble predictions of the non-tidal residual component of coastal water levels at United States coastal gauge stations for the period 2000–2019. These models were chosen because they assimilate satellite altimetry at forecast initialization and attempt to predict the mean sea level, including a global mean component whose absence in other forecast systems complicates assessment of tide gauge reforecast skill. Both forecast systems have skill that exceeds damped persistence for forecast leads through 2–3 weeks, with IFS skill exceeding damped persistence for leads up to six weeks. Post-processing forecasts to include the inverse barometer effect, derived from mean sea level pressure forecasts, improves skill for relatively short forecast leads (1–3 weeks). Accounting for vertical land motion of each gauge primarily improves skill for longer leads (3–6 weeks), especially for the Alaskan and Gulf Coasts; sea-level trends contribute to reforecast skill for both model and persistence forecasts, primarily for the East and Gulf Coasts. Overall, we find that current forecast systems have sufficiently high levels of deterministic and probabilistic skill to be used in support of operational coastal flood guidance on subseasonal timescales.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu

Status: open (until 02 May 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu
John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu

Viewed

Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
62 6 2 70 10 0 0
  • HTML: 62
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 70
  • Supplement: 10
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 65 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 65 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Providing early warning of coastal flooding is an emerging priority for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We assess whether current operational forecast models can provide the basis for predicting the risks of higher than normal coastal sea level values up to six weeks in advance. For many United States coastal locations, models have sufficient prediction skill to be used as the basis for the development of a high tide flooding prediction system on subseasonal timescales.
Share