Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-51
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-51
07 Feb 2025
 | 07 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Future global water scarcity partially alleviated by vegetation responses to atmospheric CO2 and climate change

Jessica Stacey, Richard Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina Mercado, and Nicola Gedney

Abstract. Accurate water scarcity projections are essential for effective adaptation strategies. Most existing studies rely on hydrology models that often neglect the effects of plant physiological responses to rising CO2 on the water cycle , such as reduced stomatal opening, which can decrease transpiration and enhance water availability over large scales. Using a land surface model driven by an Earth system model under a high-emission climate scenario, we evaluate how physiological and structural plant responses to rising CO2 and subsequent climate change affect the Water Scarcity Index (WSI). Our simulations suggest that the combined effects of these plant responses partially alleviate WSI for most regions, largely due to CO2-induced stomatal closure. However, CO2- and climate-induced vegetation changes do exacerbate water scarcity in some places, particularly arid regions. By 2076–2095, when incorporating all plant responses in our projections, global median WSI is approximately 12 % lower, and among 291 global river basins, median WSI is between 10 and 70 % lower in 138 basins, home to 80 % of the global population, and between 10 % and 60 % higher in 11 basins, home to 0.2 % of the population. These model results highlight the potential for plant responses to CO2 to somewhat alleviate water scarcity, noting water scarcity is still projected to worsen in many regions, including highly populated areas. There is an urgent need to gather empirical evidence on the strength of plant responses to CO2 at large scales to address modelling uncertainties.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Jessica Stacey, Richard Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina Mercado, and Nicola Gedney

Status: open (until 17 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jessica Stacey, Richard Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina Mercado, and Nicola Gedney
Jessica Stacey, Richard Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina Mercado, and Nicola Gedney

Viewed

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
115 24 3 142 16 4 4
  • HTML: 115
  • PDF: 24
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 142
  • Supplement: 16
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 142 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Plants typically transpire less with rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, leaving more water in the ground for human use, but many future water scarcity assessments ignore this effect. We use a land surface model to examine how plant responses to carbon dioxide and climate change affect future water scarcity. Our results suggest that including these plant responses increases overall water availability for most people, highlighting the importance of their inclusion in future water scarcity studies.
Share