Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4966
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4966
03 Nov 2025
 | 03 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Exploring the Potential of LPJmL-5 to Simulate Vegetation Responses to (Multi-Year) Droughts

Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders

Abstract. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of Multi-Year Droughts (MYDs), but their impacts on vegetation remain poorly understood. While satellite records offer valuable insights, they cover only recent decades, limiting the number of MYDs available for analysis. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), such as LPJmL-5, can help overcome this limitation by simulating vegetation dynamics over longer timescales. However, their ability to capture drought impacts has not yet been systematically evaluated. In this study, we benchmark LPJmL-5 against MODIS-derived gross primary production (GPP) to assess how well it captures vegetation responses to drought. We find that LPJmL-5 reproduces GPP reasonably well in some regions, but improvements can still be made in the Southern Hemisphere and for croplands. During MYDs, LPJmL-5 captures the key temporal and spatial GPP drought dynamics observed in MODIS. However, the model tends to overestimate vegetation response at the onset of MYDs and shows some rapid recovery behaviour, resulting in muted overall drought impacts. Vegetation responses also vary by type: croplands show relatively good agreement, while boreal and temperate vegetation underestimate positive and negative impacts, respectively. These discrepancies appear to be linked to simplified model representations of vegetation stress and mortality, which limit long-term vegetation loss. Our results highlight the need to improve how LPJmL-5 simulates vegetation stress and recovery, especially under prolonged drought conditions, in order to better capture ecosystem vulnerability in a changing climate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders

Status: open (until 15 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders
Denise Ruijsch, Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, and Niko Wanders

Viewed

Total article views: 66 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
54 9 3 66 17 1 2
  • HTML: 54
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 66
  • Supplement: 17
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 58 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 58 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how plants respond to long droughts using model simulations and satellite data. The model reproduces drought impacts fairly well but tends to show plants recovering too quickly. Improving how the model represents plant stress and recovery will help predict how ecosystems respond to more frequent and severe droughts in the future.
Share