Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3851
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3851
20 Oct 2025
 | 20 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Technical Note: High Nash Sutcliffe Efficiencies conceal poor simulations of interannual variance in tropical, alpine, and polar catchments

Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus

Abstract. Streamflow time series can be decomposed into interannual, seasonal, and irregular components, with regionally varying contributions of each component. Seasonal variance dominates in many tropical, alpine, and polar regions, while irregular variance dominates in most other regions. Interannual variability in streamflow is known to strongly influence human and ecological systems and is likely to increase under the influence of climate change, though we find that historical interannual variance is usually only a small fraction of the total variance. We show that hydrologic models often simulate one component well while failing to simulate the others, a fact that is hidden by popular performance metrics such as the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and the Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) which aggregate performance to a single number. We analyse 18 regional and global hydrologic models and find that in highly seasonal catchments where the NSE and KGE are consistently the highest, the models are almost always worse at simulating interannual variability. The NSE of the interannual component is lower in highly seasonal catchments, and simulated year-to-year changes in ecologically relevant hydrologic signatures are less accurate. This is concerning because it indicates that these hydrologic models may struggle to predict long-term responses to climate change, especially in tropical, alpine, and polar regions, which are some of the most vulnerable regimes regarding climate change.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus

Status: open (until 01 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus
Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Common metrics used to evaluate hydrologic models make it relatively easy to achieve high performance scores in many tropical, alpine, and polar regions. However, we analysed 18 hydrologic models and found that almost all were worse at simulating interannual variability and change in these regions. This suggests that the effects of climate change on streamflow may not be accurately predicted in tropical, alpine, and polar climates, which are highly vulnerable to climate change.
Share