Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3703
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3703
18 Aug 2025
 | 18 Aug 2025

Conditions for Instability in the Climate-Carbon Cycle System

Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul David Longden Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark Williamson, and Peter Cox

Abstract. The climate and carbon cycle interact in multiple ways. An increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere warms the climate through the greenhouse effect, but also leads to uptake of CO2 by the land and ocean sink, a negative feedback. However, the warming associated with a CO2 increase is also expected to suppress carbon uptake, a positive feedback. This study addresses the question: ‘under what circumstances could the climate-carbon cycle system become unstable?’ It uses both a reduced form model of the climate-carbon cycle system as well as the complex land model JULES, combined with linear stability theory, to show that: (i) the key destabilising loop involves the increase in soil respiration with temperature; (ii) the climate-carbon system can become unstable if either the climate sensitivity to CO2 or the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature is large, and (iii) the climate-carbon system is stabilized by land and ocean carbon sinks that increase with atmospheric CO2, with CO2-fertilization of plant photosynthesis playing a key role. For central estimates of key parameters, the critical equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) that would lead to instability at current atmospheric CO2 lies between about 11 K (for large CO2 fertilization) and 6K (for no CO2 fertilization). The latter value is close to the highest ECS values amongst the latest Earth Systems Models. Contrary to a previous study that did not include an interactive ocean carbon cycle sink, we find that the stability of the climate-carbon system increases with atmospheric CO2, such that the glacial CO2 concentration of 190 ppmv would be unstable even for ECS greater than around 4.5 K in the absence of CO2 fertilization of land photosynthesis.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Nov 2025
| Highlight paper
Conditions for instability in the climate–carbon cycle system
Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul D. L. Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark S. Williamson, and Peter Cox
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2087–2100, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2087-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2087-2025, 2025
Short summary Chief editor
Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul David Longden Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark Williamson, and Peter Cox

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3703', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Sep 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joe Clarke, 27 Oct 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3703', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joe Clarke, 27 Oct 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3703', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Sep 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joe Clarke, 27 Oct 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3703', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joe Clarke, 27 Oct 2025

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (29 Oct 2025) by Ben Kravitz
AR by Joe Clarke on behalf of the Authors (29 Oct 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (31 Oct 2025) by Ben Kravitz
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (31 Oct 2025)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (05 Nov 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (05 Nov 2025) by Ben Kravitz
AR by Joe Clarke on behalf of the Authors (10 Nov 2025)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Nov 2025
| Highlight paper
Conditions for instability in the climate–carbon cycle system
Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul D. L. Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark S. Williamson, and Peter Cox
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2087–2100, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2087-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2087-2025, 2025
Short summary Chief editor
Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul David Longden Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark Williamson, and Peter Cox
Joseph Clarke, Chris Huntingford, Paul David Longden Ritchie, Rebecca Varney, Mark Williamson, and Peter Cox

Viewed

Total article views: 1,353 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,206 123 24 1,353 41 36 31
  • HTML: 1,206
  • PDF: 123
  • XML: 24
  • Total: 1,353
  • Supplement: 41
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,348 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,348 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Dec 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
An increase in CO2 in the atmosphere warms the climate through the greenhouse effect, but also leads to uptake of CO2 by the land and ocean. However, the warming is also expected to suppress carbon uptake. If this suppression were strong enough, it could overwhelm the uptake of carbon, leading to a runaway feedback loop causing severe global warming. We find it is possible that this runaway could be relevant in complex climate models and even at the end of the last ice age.
Share