Exploring Hybrid Forecasting Frameworks for Subseasonal Low Flow Predictions in the European Alps
Abstract. Since the start of the 21st century, the European Alpine region has faced unprecedented low-flow conditions and drought events, severely impacting sectors dependent on reliable water availability, such as hydropower production, agriculture, and transportation. The growing frequency and severity of these low-flow conditions have led to a need for early warning systems. In this study, we present a novel machine learning (ML) aided hybrid forecasting framework designed to enhance sub-seasonal low-flow predictions in the European Alps. By harnessing the statistical power of ML and integrating diverse data sources, we trained 11 models using the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) algorithm. These models incorporate features such as European Atlantic Weather Regimes (WR) for capturing large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns, in-situ streamflow observations for initial conditions, and process-based predictions from the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS). Our results show that the hybrid framework, even when using only WR data, outperforms climatology. The best results are achieved by combining observational data with process-based model data (raw EFAS output), underscoring the value of integrating diverse data sources. The models effectively capture initial condition persistence and correct biases in the raw EFAS output. Based on the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS), the best model effectively extends the skilful forecast horizon by 5 days on average across all stations during low flow periods. Furthermore, the interpretability of the TFT model provides valuable insights, identifying glacier coverage as a key catchment feature influencing model performance. Future research should further explore the connections between hydrological features and prediction skill, as well as the framework's applicability in ungauged areas and other regions.
Review of ” Exploring Hybrid Forecasting Frameworks for Subseasonal Low Flow Predictions in the European Alps” by Chang et al. The paper presents the use of a ML technique and hybrid form to improve sub-seasonal low-flow in the European alps. The results are somewhat underwhelming in the sense that the best effect of the hybrid technique requires EFAS model data, and the WR does not add information in these cases. Adding observations helped gain skill, but as the authors point out, the method then becomes a very sophisticated bias correction method. The question then arises whether similar results can be achieved by less comp[lex methods. The study shows a major improvements in uncalibrated catchments which is useful, but why are these points not calibrated in the first place? The study is still worthwhile publishing , but I do recommend a major revision.
Major comments
The choice of mean flow is a very weak benchmark as it is not considering even the seasonal patterns of the streamflow, therefore making it very easy to beat and not very useful as diagnostic measure of your model performance. I strongly recommend testing the method against a benchmark of using LISFLOOD modelled with observational data, selected randomly omitting the actual year (ESP) as in Arnal et al, 2028 and Wetterhall and Di Giuseppe 2018.
The selection of measures to measure skill is also not carefully considered. The authors want to provide an assessment of low flows, but have not chosen metrics that can reflect that, or modified the metrics to show thee skill, for example by using the log values instead of streamflow, or selecting a sub-set of the hydrograph to focus on the low-flows. I am therefore puzzled why the study in the title says it focuses on low-flow.
The language is in general very good, but the figures are generally very difficult to interpreted and need to be improved substantially. I also think that the authors sometimes show too much information rather than focussing on the important results.
Minor comments
References
Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Stephens, E., Wetterhall, F., Prudhomme, C., Neumann, J., Krzeminski, B., and Pappenberger, F.: Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018, 2018.
Wetterhall, F. and Di Giuseppe, F.: The benefit of seamless forecasts for hydrological predictions over Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3409–3420, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3409-2018, 2018.