Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2902
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2902
19 Aug 2025
 | 19 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Technical Note: Can Visual Gauges Trained on Biased Contact-based Gauge Data Accurately Estimate River Stage?

Ze Wang, Heng Lyu, Guangtao Fu, and Chi Zhang

Abstract. Water stage variations significantly influence biochemical and hydrological processes within river networks. River camera, with its ease of deployment and low cost, has emerged as a promising tool for water stage estimation, enabling efficient water stage interpretation from images via deep learning (DL). However, a critical challenge is the requirement of accurate water stage data for DL training, which often have biases caused by sedimentations, floating debris or water flow impacts associated with contact-based gauge observations. Previous studies have overlooked the influence of gauge data errors in real-world applications. This study introduces an imaging-based water stage estimation framework that addresses hidden errors in gauge station measurements for training DL models. The framework adopts a multi-task learning paradigm, using erroneous gauge stage data as labels and incorporating water pixel ratios automatically extracted from images to constrain model estimation ranking. Based on training loss, a thresholding method then filters error-free data to retrain an unbiased model. This framework is tested on images and bubble-gauge stage data from the Minturn River, Greenland, spanning 2019 to 2021. The results obtained show the framework successfully identified a gauge offset event on July 29, 2021, and mitigated an average water stage observation error of approximately 0.6 meters thereafter. Moreover, the trained DL model revealed water stage fluctuations under low-flow conditions that gauge observation could not reflect. This study implies that integrating contact and non-contact observations is a robust approach for river stage measurement.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ze Wang, Heng Lyu, Guangtao Fu, and Chi Zhang

Status: open (until 15 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ze Wang, Heng Lyu, Guangtao Fu, and Chi Zhang
Ze Wang, Heng Lyu, Guangtao Fu, and Chi Zhang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,032 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,012 17 3 1,032 22 20
  • HTML: 1,012
  • PDF: 17
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 1,032
  • BibTeX: 22
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,027 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,027 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Faulty river gauges can mislead AI models that translate river photos into water levels. We proposed a two-stage framework that first learns from all data, detects bias, then retrains itself with the trustworthy part it has identified. Applied to a Greenland river, the system flagged a sudden 0.6 m gauge shift, corrected later data, and revealed subtle low-flow changes missed by the gauge. Combining low-cost cameras with imperfect gauges can deliver reliable water-level monitoring.
Share