the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Interannual variability of summertime cross-isobath exchanges in the northern South China Sea: ENSO and riverine influences
Abstract. This study investigates the interannual variability of summer shelf circulation in the Northern South China Sea (NSCS) from 2000 to 2022, combining long-term observations and high-resolution simulations. We elucidate the responses of NSCS shelf circulation to ENSO and Pearl River Estuary (PRE) freshwater runoff, revealing distinct spatial and mechanistic signatures. During El Niño years, a pronounced sea level anomaly dipole forms between the central and southern South China Sea, intensifying northward geostrophic currents in the southern basin and modulating Kuroshio intrusion. Simultaneously, an amplified PRE plume extends eastward to the 100 m isobath, markedly reducing nearshore salinity. Analysis of depth-integrated vorticity equations indicates that the pressure gradient force—driven by the joint effect of baroclinicity and bottom relief (JEBAR) and bottom pressure gradients—governs NSCS circulation variability. In coastal regions, cross-isobath velocity anomalies are primarily controlled by bottom stress curl and nonlinear vorticity advection, whereas JEBAR dominates offshore dynamics beyond the 100 m isobath. During El Niño summers, bottom density anomalies generate positive cross-isobath velocity anomalies through JEBAR, partially offset by negative anomalies from altered vertical stratification, sustaining a meandering shelf current. These results highlight the interplay of regional and remote forcings, advancing understanding of NSCS hydrographic dynamics.
- Preprint
(6198 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Aug 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2712', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jul 2025
reply
This manuscript presents a comprehensive investigation of the interannual variability of summer shelf circulation in the Northern South China Sea (NSCS) from 2000 to 2022 based on ROMS modeling. The study makes significant contributions to understanding the differential impacts of ENSO and Pearl River Estuary (PRE) freshwater runoff on NSCS circulation dynamics. While the paper is generally well-structured and scientifically sound, several aspects require clarification and improvement before publication.
Comments:
- Line 57-66, I recommend incorporating this study's findings and conclusions to more explicitly identify the shortcomings of existing research in quantifying the impacts of ENSO and river runoff on cross-shelf transport in the northern South China Sea.
- Section 2, the authors have presented comparison results between observations and model simulations for temperature, salinity, and sea level. However, they did not mention the more crucial current observation data. How does the model perform in simulating shelf circulation? Of course, I understand that current observation data is relatively scarce, and model simulations of circulation may have greater errors. It would be preferable to provide some validation of circulation observations here.
- Section 3.1, the MVEOF analysis serves as a critically important tool in this study. However, for readers unfamiliar with this methodology, the current paper provides insufficient explanation. I had to search online to understand the fundamental principles of this method before being able to properly follow the article's discussion. The introduction of MVEOF should be moved to Section 2 (Methods), and requires more detailed explanation.
- Line 147, there is an extra closing parenthesis ")" in this line.
- All variables in the equations should be clearly defined in the text. For example, the H and tao in Equ. 2.
- As a researcher specializing in shelf material transport, I find the subject of this paper particularly compelling. The study provides in-depth dynamic analysis of ENSO and runoff impacts on cross-isobath transport, but lacks quantitative information that would be most useful for practical applications. For instance: (1)Missing baseline metrics: What is the approximate summer cross-shelf transport velocity in the northern South China Sea? This could be calculated from Figure 4b. Without concrete values, the results are difficult for other researchers to directly utilize. (2) Quantification of forcing contributions: Can the relative contributions of ENSO versus river discharge to cross-isobath transport be quantified?Including these quantitative results in the abstract or conclusions would significantly enhance the paper's citation potential and appeal to a broader scientific audience.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2712-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80 | 11 | 7 | 98 | 5 | 3 |
- HTML: 80
- PDF: 11
- XML: 7
- Total: 98
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1