the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Snow accumulation rates at Concordia Station, Antarctica, observed by stake farms
Abstract. In this study, surface mass balance (SMB) is estimated from snow accumulation data collected in the nearby area of Concordia Station, Antarctica. Results from the Italian and French stake farms are jointly analysed. The Italian stake farm is located ~800 m southwest of Concordia Station and consists of 13 stakes; continuous observations started at the end of 2010 with near-monthly sampling. Some measurements are also available for the 2006–2010 period from a previous stake farm which was located ~500 m south-southwest of the Station, i.e., ~300 m east of the current site. The French stake farm is located ~2 km south of the base and consists of 50 stakes; observations started in 2004 with yearly sampling during austral summer. Snow build-up measurements at individual stakes show a strong variability caused by the interaction of wind-driven snow with surface micro-relief. In the common observation period, the present Italian stake farm generally underestimates the SMB with respect to the French one, except for three years in which an overestimation is observed. Over the 2011–2023 period, the mean yearly accumulation recorded by the Italian and French stake farms is 7.3±0.2 cm and 8.4±0.1 cm, respectively. Bootstrap simulation has been performed to: (i) assess the significance of the differences between the two datasets; (ii) evaluate the effect on the measurements of the different size of the stake farms and their distance to the Station. The comparison of the observations with reanalysis datasets (ERA5 and MERRA2) and regional models (RACMO2.4p1, MAR3.12) indicates the former more in agreement with the observations. The potential interaction effect of the Station has also been investigated by analysing wind direction during snowfall events, suggesting that buildings may influence accumulation when they are upwind with respect to the stake farms. Additionally, two more stake farms, located 25 km north and south of Concordia Station, are also analysed to study the SMB gradient across Dome C, confirming previous results. On average, yearly SMB increases northward by 8–9 % over the 50 km span between the southern and northern stake farms. At Concordia, for the 2004–2023 period, a mean SMB of 27.21±0.60 kg m–2 has been estimated, taking into account the uncertainty of the observations and of the snow compaction effect. Results are valuable for validating SMB estimated from reanalysis, regional climate models and remote-sensing data.
- Preprint
(4252 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(359 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Aug 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2477', Alexey Ekaykin, 25 Jun 2025
reply
Dear Claudio, congratulations with this manuscript, it is brilliant!
I have a couple of comments, see below:
Section 2.1, Italian stake farms: as I can see from the text, the size of the farms is something like 60 by 70 m. If so, the farms are comparable in size with the largest snow dunes traveling across the snow surface. This fact can add the noise to the inter-annual ITA SMB time-series, which may explain a larger inter-annual variability at ITA farms (Fig. 5).
Then, the distance between stakes at these farms is 10 m which is close to the distance of noise correlation. It means that the observation at a single stake is not independent from the adjacent stakes, and the effective number of datapoints is < 13.
Taking this into account, and also considering the information in Section 4.3 (the farms are too close to the Station?), is it better not to use the ITA data in further analyses?
Also a few small ones:
Line 46 - “SMB is a small difference between large fluxes». I am not sure what you mean here exactly. SMB is (in a first approximation) a difference between precipitation and sublimation, the latter being relatively small fraction (like 10-20 %) of the first. It is the total Antarctic ice sheet mass balance which is a small difference of two huge fluxes, total snow accumulation (SMB integrated over the area) and ice ablation on the AIS’s edges.
Lines 54-56 – here you describe how we make a correction for snow compaction at Vostok, but this paragraph is about defining the density of an annual layer in order to calculate SMB in water equivalent. For this we measure the mean density in the upper 20 cm of snow thickness in a number of random points across the stake farm.
Line 72 – I cannot find Vandecrux et al., 2024 in the reference list.
Line 109 – as I can see in Figure 1b, the length of each farm’s profile is about 1 km, 25 stakes in each profile. It means an average distance between stakes is 40 m, not 25 m.
Lines 175-176 — it is better to say that each snow layer within this thickness is compressed under the weight of the overlying snow.
Tables 2 and 4 – there are negative values in the lower limits of the confidence intervals of the compaction corrections which is not possible physically. Probably it’s better to set forcibly the lower limits to zero?
Very best regards,
Alexey Ekaykin
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2477-CC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
131 | 32 | 8 | 171 | 10 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 131
- PDF: 32
- XML: 8
- Total: 171
- Supplement: 10
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1