Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-235
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-235
14 Feb 2025
 | 14 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Observationally Constrained Analysis on the Distribution of Fine and Coarse Mode Nitrate in Global Climate Models

Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Zheng Lu, Xiaohong Liu, Huisheng Bian, David Cohen, Yan Feng, Mian Chin, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Vlassis A. Karydis, Marianne T. Lund, Gunnar Myhre, Andrea Pozzer, Michael Schulz, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Svetlana G. Tsyro, and Shaocheng Xie

Abstract. Nitrate plays an important role in the Earth’s climate and air quality. A key challenge in simulating the lifecycle of nitrate aerosol in global climate models is to accurately represent mass size distribution of nitrate aerosol. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 (E3SMv2) and the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), along with Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) phase III models, in simulating spatial distribution of fine-mode nitrate, mass size distribution of fine- and coarse-mode nitrate, and the gas-aerosol partitioning between nitric acid gas and nitrate, using long-term ground-based observations and measurements from multiple aircraft campaigns. We find that most models underestimate the annual mean PM2.5 (particulate matter with diameter less than 2.5 μm) nitrate surface concentration averaged over all sites. The observed nitrate PM2.5/PM10 and PM1/PM4 ratios are influenced by the relative contribution of fine sulfate/organic particles and coarse dust/sea salt particles. Overall, the ground-based observations give an annual mean surface nitrate PM2.5/PM10 ratio of 0.7. Most models underestimate the annual mean PM2.5/PM10 ratio in all regions. There are large spreads in the modeled nitrate PM1/PM4 ratios, which span the full range from 0 to 1. Most models underestimate the surface molar ratio of nitrate to total inorganic nitrate averaged across all sites. Our study indicates the importance of gas-aerosol partition parameterization and simulation of dust and sea salt in correctly simulating mass size distribution of nitrate.

Competing interests: Some co-authors are members of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The authors have no other competing interests to declare.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Download
Short summary
A key challenge in simulating the lifecycle of nitrate aerosol in global climate models is to...
Share