the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of late Paleoproterozoic diorites in the Trans-North China Orogen
Abstract. The Xiong’er volcanic rocks and mafic dike swarms mark a significant magmatic event after the amalgamation of the North China Craton (NCC) in the Paleoproterozoic, yet their tectonic origins remain controversial. Several Paleoproterozoic diorite intrusions have received widespread attention recently. Their genesis and geological significance are crucial for understanding the evolution of the NCC. In this study, we report zircon U-Pb ages and geochemical data of the Jiguanshan diorite. The diorites in the Trans-North China Orogen, including the Jiguanshan diorite, have comparable element and isotopic geochemical characteristics. The weighted mean average of initial 87Sr/86Sr and εNd(t) values is 0.7052 ±0.0003 and -6.5 ±0.2, respectively. The initial Pb isotope compositions of these diorite samples do not show significant enrichment of radiogenic lead. In terms of Sr-Nd-Pb isotope compositions and Nb/Ta, Ba/Th, and Sr/Th ratios, these diorites differ from the Xiong’er volcanic rocks and mafic dike swarms. Our results suggest that these diorites originated from the basaltic lower crust, rather than from the enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle. Whole-rock and zircon trace element geological tectonic diagrams indicate that the diorites formed in a rift environment. These diorites mark a crustal-origin rock shift from orogenic-related magmatism to intraplate magmatism during the post-collisional extensional stage.
- Preprint
(3025 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(113 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Aug 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2115', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jul 2025
reply
Dear editor,
I have carefully read the article “Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of late Paleoproterozoic diorites in the Trans-North China Orogen”.
The authors systematically studied the ca. 1.78–1.75 Ga Jiguanshan diorite and other coeval diorites from the southern margin of the NCC. These diorites are inferred to have similar geochemical characteristics and may have formed during a single magmatic episode. This, together with the whole rock geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions, as well as zircon Hf isotopic compositions, enabled a better understanding of the tectonic environment and evolution of the NCC during the late Paleoproterozoic.
The science of this manuscript looks fine to me, but I also noticed some spellings and grammar mistakes, along with incomplete sentences. Furthermore, I would also like to suggest the authors slightly re-organize structures. Therefore, I believe this manuscript can be published after a careful revision.
Some of my major concern,
1. Please rearrange the abstract. Key data such as ages of the investigated diorite are not presented. The first sentence is also misleading, the Xiong’er volcanic rocks are not the focus of this study. The inferred conclusions are not supported by data. Please present more data patterns in the abstract.
2. Rearrange the Introduction
The scientific questions mentioned in the introduction are not clearly presented, and not closely linked with your discussion.
Verifying the necessity of your research is very important.
It would be better if you can slightly revise the introduction, or perhaps you can revise the discussion.
3. The research background should be more detailed. Give us more information on the assembly of the north China craton, related metamorphic and igneous records, as well as related structures. Tell us more about the Xionger group, the Taihua group, their relations.
4. I believe that models for the distribution of the tectonic units of the north China craton are very much varied. There are some other models that are not mentioned by the article, but should be mentioned.
5. line 38 what is the ancient basement rocks? Be specific
6. line 40-41, not logically correct.
7. I don’t see strong evidence of rifting setting. Please expand your discussion on the tectonic settings.
If the diorites and the xionger groups were coeval, but the xionger volcanics rocks were formed in an arc setting. How can you explain the within plate setting of these diorites.
Figure 1, revise.
Figure 2, any good field photo?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2115-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 | 17 | 4 | 110 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
- HTML: 89
- PDF: 17
- XML: 4
- Total: 110
- Supplement: 3
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1