Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2010
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2010
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Brief communication: A magma depletion alternative for vent distribution in volcanic fields
Abstract. The location of a volcanic vent controls an eruption's hazards, intensities, and impact. Current kernel density estimation methods of future vent locations in volcanic fields assume that locations with more past-vents are more likely to produce future-vents. We examine an alternative hypothesis that an eruption depletes the magma source, causing holes or dips in the spatial density estimate for future vent locations. This is illustrated with the Auckland Volcanic Field, Aotearoa-New Zealand, where both magmatic and phreatomagmatic eruptions have occurred, according to the vent location, with the latter resulting in more explosive eruptions and hence hazard.
How to cite. Bebbington, M. S., Whitehead, M. G., and Kereszturi, G.: Brief communication: A magma depletion alternative for vent distribution in volcanic fields, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2010, 2025.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Download & links
- Preprint
(787 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(153 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 02 Jul 2025)
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
Viewed
Total article views: 84 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 May 2025)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
63 | 18 | 3 | 84 | 12 | 3 | 3 |
- HTML: 63
- PDF: 18
- XML: 3
- Total: 84
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 101 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 101 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 17 Jun 2025
Mark S. Bebbington
Volcanic Risk Solutions, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4472, New Zealand
Melody G. Whitehead
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Volcanic Risk Solutions, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4472, New Zealand
Gabor Kereszturi
Volcanic Risk Solutions, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4472, New Zealand
Short summary
In volcanic fields, the location of an eruptive vent controls the hazards, their intensities, and ultimately the impact of the eruption. Estimates of where future eruptions are likely to occur inform evacuation plans, the (re)location of vital infrastructure, and the placement of early-warning monitoring equipment. Current estimates assume that locations with more past-vents are more likely to produce future-vents. We provide the formulae for an alternative hypothesis of magma depletion.
In volcanic fields, the location of an eruptive vent controls the hazards, their intensities,...