the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Understanding extreme-wave hazards on high-energy coasts requires a standardised approach to field data collection: Analysis and recommendations
Abstract. Coastal boulder deposits provide vital information on extreme wave events. They are crucial for understanding storm and tsunami impacts on rocky coasts, and for understanding long-term hazard histories. But study of these deposits is still a young field, and growth in investigation has been rapid, without much contact between research groups. Therefore, inconsistencies in field data collection among different studies hinder cross-site comparisons and limit the applicability of findings across disciplines. This paper analyses field methodologies for coastal boulder deposit measurement based using an integrated database (ISROC-DB), demonstrating inconsistencies in current approaches. We use the analysis as a basis for outlining protocols to improve data comparability and utility for geoscientists, engineers, and coastal planners. Using a standardised and comprehensive set of measurements, with due attention to precision and reproducibility, will help ensure complete data retrieval in the field. Applying these approaches will further ensure that data collected at different times and/or locations, and by different groups, is useful not just for the study being undertaken, but for other researchers to analyse and reuse. This is fosters development of the large, internally consistent datasets that are the basis for fruitful meta-analysis; and is particularly timely given increasing focus on longitudinal monitoring of coastal change. By recommending a common set of measurements, adaptable to available equipment and personnel, this work aims to support accurate and thorough coastal boulder deposit documentation, enabling broader applicability and future-proofed datasets. Field protocols described and recommended here also apply as best practices for coastal geomorphology field work in general.
- Preprint
(1453 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(50 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 Aug 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1913', Giovanni Scardino, 11 Jul 2025
reply
This paper provides a useful description of a standardized approach that can be applied to coastal boulder studies. In particular, it details protocols for defining boulder lithology, assessing dimensional parameters, and evaluating the wave flow required to initiate boulder motion. This paper could serve as a benchmark for scientists who wish to reproduce field surveys on coastal boulders.
I have included only a few comments in the attached PDF file for your consideration during revision. Additionally, I would like to highlight another aspect that could be addressed: the importance of chronological constraints for paleoreconstructing the landscape at the time of boulder displacement. In my opinion, this is a key factor in accurately assessing boulder motion and can help distinguish between storm and tsunami deposits. Furthermore, paleoreconstruction allows for the estimation of sea level and coastline position at the time of displacement—both crucial parameters for numerical modeling.
Many thanks and kind regards.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
179 | 34 | 11 | 224 | 15 | 6 | 11 |
- HTML: 179
- PDF: 34
- XML: 11
- Total: 224
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1