Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1451
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1451
19 Jun 2025
 | 19 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Validation of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: A mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring

Jacob T. Shaw, Neil Howes, Jessica Connolly, Dragos E. Buculei, Jamie Ryan, Jon Helmore, Nigel Yarrow, David Butterfield, Fabrizio Innocenti, and Rod Robinson

Abstract. The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) has developed and trialled a mobile and remotely-operated Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system for continuous measurements of emissions at the facility spatial scale. FEDS is capable of both locating and quantifying emission sources over long-term periods and has been deployed at sites around the UK to monitor methane emissions from the natural gas network, landfill, and waste treatment. This work presents validation activities using a controlled release facility (CRF) to test the performance of the measurement system and two reverse dispersion models (Airviro and WindTrax) for emission quantification. Emissions were quantified using prior knowledge of release timings as well as in the absence of this knowledge. High variability in wind direction was shown to negatively impact emission quantification accuracy (especially for Airviro). Emission results were improved by removing periods of high wind variability (low wind persistence) from analysis. Both models performed better when using daily-averaging periods for emissions (Airviro RMSE = 0.37 kg h-1; WindTrax = 0.29 kg h-1) over shorter averaging periods, such as hourly data (Airviro RMSE = 0.77 kg h-1; WindTrax = 2.19 kg h-1). Emission rates were shown to be sensitive to the specified source release height for both models, with discrepancies in model release height relative to the true release height of more than 0.5 m yielding less accurate results. Furthermore, it was shown that emission results were less accurate when using concentration data input from fewer sampling locations, although it would be remiss to recommend a minimum density of sampling locations for a given area based on a single validation study.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Jacob T. Shaw, Neil Howes, Jessica Connolly, Dragos E. Buculei, Jamie Ryan, Jon Helmore, Nigel Yarrow, David Butterfield, Fabrizio Innocenti, and Rod Robinson

Status: open (until 13 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jacob T. Shaw, Neil Howes, Jessica Connolly, Dragos E. Buculei, Jamie Ryan, Jon Helmore, Nigel Yarrow, David Butterfield, Fabrizio Innocenti, and Rod Robinson
Jacob T. Shaw, Neil Howes, Jessica Connolly, Dragos E. Buculei, Jamie Ryan, Jon Helmore, Nigel Yarrow, David Butterfield, Fabrizio Innocenti, and Rod Robinson

Viewed

Total article views: 176 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
153 16 7 176 9 12
  • HTML: 153
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 176
  • BibTeX: 9
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 174 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 174 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
The FEDS system is used to measure emissions from local-scale sources (up to about 1×1 km). To do this, FEDS uses a state-of-the-art gas analyser connected to lots of sampling locations. Controlled amounts of methane were released to test the accuracy of the FEDS method. Results were promising even when using different models to estimate the amounts of methane. Results were better when the wind was more stable. FEDS could be used for measuring emission sources over many months or seasons.
Share